Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Food and heart symptoms

nimzabo
 Share

Recommended Posts

knitty kitty Grand Master
knitty kitty
Posted

And this one...

Glyphosate, pathways to modern diseases II: Celiac sprue and gluten intolerance

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3945755/

 

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


knitty kitty Grand Master
knitty kitty
Posted

And one more about a person who drank glyphosate and his medical support included Thiamine.

Glyphosate Poisoning with Acute Pulmonary Edema

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4413421/

 

nimzabo Rookie
nimzabo
Posted
  • Author
11 hours ago, knitty kitty said:

And this one...

Glyphosate, pathways to modern diseases II: Celiac sprue and gluten intolerance

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3945755/

 

Scott Adams had already send a link leading to that study.

When studying to my thesis I already had seen such a study and more works from Stephanie Seneff including videos I saw on youtube and even a paper from investigators I respect (Antoniou and Mesnages) criticizing some of her assertions (https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00316/full ). She's not a laboratory researcher and she comes from an area related to computers if I'm not mistaken. Her basic formation is not biology.

Anyway she got interested in autism and through that concern on glyphosate. She says that because she is not a real cientific investigator, has more time to read all the research that comes to light than 'real cientists' do.

She is somewhat known for speculating and not rarely she confuses correlation with causation. Some of her opinions aren't really suported by science or experimentation. That doesn't mean her opinion should not be heard or read. Only that it must be taken with caution.

I bought and read her last book about glyphosate, most of which surpasses my basic knowledge.

https://www.amazon.com/Toxic-Legacy-Weedkiller-Glyphosate-Environment/dp/1603589295/ref=sr_1_1?qid=1659189077&refinements=p_27%3AStephanie+Seneff&s=books&sr=1-1

 

See these for example

https://www.diseaseglyphosategmos.info/

https://jennifermargulis.net/glyphosate-and-covid-19-connection/

 

Blue-Sky Enthusiast
Blue-Sky
Posted

@kitty kitty

Yes I did read your link. I also read this one and I am not sure it matches very well with the other one.

https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/MVMS-HealthProfessional/

knitty kitty Grand Master
knitty kitty
Posted

High dose Thiamine is not a mainstream practice yet.

 

  • 3 months later...
nimzabo Rookie
nimzabo
Posted
  • Author

Hi again.

I'm not sure this is the best place but I'm sharing two links that might be of use:

https://www.annualreviews.org/page/nutrition-health

https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100047148611666

 

  • 9 months later...
DanMc Rookie
DanMc
Posted

I know this is an older topic, but I just wanted to say that the heat intolerance/arrhythmia made me wonder if this was Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome, or POTS

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postural_orthostatic_tachycardia_syndrome

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


knitty kitty Grand Master
knitty kitty
Posted

@DanMc,

POTS is seen in Thiamine Deficiency Disorders.  

Vitamin B1 deficiency in patients with postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS)

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28531358/

One can have a deficiency in Thiamine while still showing "normal" blood levels.  Blood levels are not an accurate measurement of how well Thiamine is being utilized in tissues and organs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,599
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Jose Mojena
    Newest Member
    Jose Mojena
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Alibu
      Waiting on biopsy after positive bloodwork, but also not really believing this is real

      By Alibu · Posted

      I was tested back in 2017 and my TTG-IGA was mildly elevated (an 11 with reference range <4) but my EMA was negative and biopsy was negative. Fast forward to 2 weeks ago where I was like y'know what, I still have so many symptoms and I'm always so sick, I should repeat this, thinking it was not going to be positive.  I also found out through 23 and me that I do have the HLA-DQ2.5 gene so I thought it would be good to repeat given my ongoing symptoms. Well my blood work came back with a ttg-iga level of 152.6 with a reference range of <15 and my EMA was positive and EMA titer was 1:10 with reference range of <1:5. I guess I'm nervous that I'm going to do the biopsy and it's going to be negative again, especially since I also had an endoscopy in 2020, not to look for celiac but just as a regular 5 year thing I do because of all my GI issues, and they didn't see anything then either. I have no idea how long the EMA has been positive but I'm wondering if it's very recent, if the biopsy will show damage and if so, if they'll say well the biopsy is the gold standard so it's not celiac? I of course am doing all the things to convince myself that it isn't real. Do a lot of people go through this? I think because back in 2017 my ttg-iga was elevated but not a huge amount and my EMA was negative and my biopsy was negative, I keep thinking this time it's going to be different. But this time my ttg-iga is 152.6 with reference range <15, and my EMA was positive. BUT, my titer is only 1:10 and I keep reading how most people here had a ttg-iga in the hundreds or thousands, and the EMA titer was much higher. So now I am convinced that it was a false positive and when they do the biopsy it'll be negative.
    • trents
      Found coffee or coffee pods that contain gluten

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @linnylou73! Are you claiming this based on a reaction or based upon actual testing?
    • linnylou73
      Found coffee or coffee pods that contain gluten

      By linnylou73 · Posted

      Sams club membermark columbian coffee is either cross contaminated or the pods contain gluten
    • KimMS
      Helping child go strict gluten-free and concerns about growth/height

      By KimMS · Posted

      Thank you! Very helpful.
    • Scott Adams
      Helping child go strict gluten-free and concerns about growth/height

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This varies a lot from person to person. I include foods that are not certified gluten-free but are labelled "gluten-free", while super sensitive people only use certified gluten-free. Both types of products have been found to contain gluten, so there are no guarantees either way: It you are in the super sensitive group, eating a whole foods based diet where you prepare everything is the safest bet, but it's also difficult. Eating out is the the most risky, even if a restaurant has a gluten-free menu. I also include items that are naturally gluten-free, for example refried beans, tuna, pasta sauces, salsas, etc., which have a low overall risk of contamination.
×
×
  • Create New...