Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

General Disease Question


jaimi alderson

Recommended Posts

jaimi alderson Enthusiast

I was diagnosed Mar 29 with celiac by bloodtest & positive biopsy. Do I say that I technically had the disease for 30 years before it was diagnosed being that I am 30 years old? I had no symptoms except anemia which I may never know if that was related as it was anemia due to small RBC's not iron-deficient & I don't have time to travel to the ends of the earth to get that question answered. But anyway NO digestive probs until Feb. 24 everyone in my house got Rhotavirus or something similar as tests for this were neg but kids got over it with in 6 dyas & I DID NOT. So I was sick for 3 weeks then got blood test back & was almost symptom free after gluten-free for a week. And now I am totally back to normal 2.5 weeks after gluten-free. So anyway have I been causing damage to my Villi my whole life with no symptoms or do I just say that I have had the disease for a month? I so appreciate any input anyone has...I have so very little time to research or write with my toddlers!!!!!!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guest nini

the general consensus is that you need something to trigger it into action, that you always had the predisposition to it, but that it took something (a stressor) to cause your body to react. So, I would say that if you can pinpoint an event, like a major illness, a job stress, an accident, childbirth anything like that, then that would be your "trigger" and you've had full blown celiac since that point. My personal opinion is that gluten is toxic to everyone and you may have been having symptoms all your life, just not severe enough to notice. But as a general rule, I would say that it needed a trigger before the damage really started to occur.

sillyyak Enthusiast

Hi

I should mention that I was also clinically asymptomatic for 35 years until Fall 2005 when I feel deathly ill. I acquired an infection, which triggered the sprue symptoms. So, like you, I also had no symptoms for all of my life. In my case an infection "activated" my celiac. This is not the case for everyone though ("there are two celiacs that are alike"). I usually say that I have had sprue all my life (if asked). I am sure I was doing damage in some way to my body (not necessarily villi related) as I have bone loss and was diagnosed with bone loss about 10 years ago. Of course hindsight is 20/20 and the bone loss was really a symptom of the celiac.

SueC Explorer

I had no Gastric symptoms at all and it was not until I was 38 that I got really sick with neurological problems and rapid weight loss. My endoscopy revealed COMPLETE villious atrophy. Hindsight being what it is, I can probably blame many unexplained miscarriages on celiac but that the is the only other symptom I showed.

tarnalberry Community Regular

There's no way to know, and it doesn't actually matter in the treatment.

ogrestrength Newbie

Do most of us pick up this stressor in our 30's? I got it when I was 33 , my sister when she was 32, and I see a whole lot more 30's on this board.

nikki-uk Enthusiast

I think the reason why alot of people finally get dx'd in their 30's is because after years of their body fighting the 'toxin' (gluten)-it finally gives up and just can't do it anymore.

This is when you 'really' start to notice that all is not right with your body.

My husband got dx'd with arthritis at 35yrs and celiac disease at 40yrs-at which point his immune system said

'Enough!!'


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



chrissy Collaborator

you can just say "i was diagnosed with celiac disease in march."

christine

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,671
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Paul1567
    Newest Member
    Paul1567
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • Scott Adams
      Welcome to the community! Generally, for a gluten challenge before celiac disease blood tests, Tylenol (acetaminophen) is considered safe and should not interfere with your antibody results. The medications you typically need to avoid are those like ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) or naproxen (Aleve) that can cause intestinal irritation, which could potentially complicate the interpretation of an endoscopy if you were to have one. However, it is absolutely crucial that you confirm this with either your gastroenterologist or your surgeon before your procedure. They know the specifics of your case and can give you the definitive green light, ensuring your surgery is comfortable and your celiac testing remains accurate. Best of luck with your surgery tomorrow
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.