Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Biopsy


ogrestrength

Recommended Posts

ogrestrength Newbie

My father has had problems for ten or more years but refuses to get tested. To this date, he has never changed his diet. My older sister was diagnosed with celiac sprue post pregnancy about 6 years ago with blood test and biopsy, she "cheats" frequently and contacts wheat all the time. I developed symptoms about 2 years ago and initially took care of the discomfort with prevacid. Later, I tested positive with the blood test but fought the doctors when they tried to do the upper G.I. I left without one being done. I have a lot of pain when I eat products containing wheat. Sometimes within 5 minutes, sometimes within 5 hours. However, it isn't a sure thing. I don't have problems touching breads or crackers ect.. either. I read these boards and second guess my "diagnosis". I frequently eat small amounts of wheat products such as corn or rice chex cereal or a single wheat thin cracker. So I ask, should I get tested with a biopsy or are there different "levels" of intolerance? Are the increased adverse reactions due to length of time g.f.?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



CarlaB Enthusiast

The longer I've been gluten-free, the more sensitive I seem to it.

If I had it to do over, I would not have tortured myself and my family with the gluten challenge required for the biopsy. It ended up being negative anyway. It probably wasn't long enough, and the wheat was making me so sick, I ate small amounts of it and skipped some days entirely. I ended up getting tested by Enterolab just to be sure I wasn't imagining it all.

You just need to decide whether you need the biopsy to prove it to yourself. If you feel better gluten-free, and have tested positive with the blood test, I'd say you definately have a problem. Would it make a difference to you if the test was negative? It didn't for me; I still knew gluten was making me ill (my blood test was negative, too, but had not taken a gluten challenge prior to it). Since I went to all that trouble and expense, I kind of wish the biopsy had been positive, in some sort of strange kind of way. I understand you thinking you need it for your own peace of mind, I felt the same way.

Carolann1217 Newbie

Hello, I am a new member and have so many questions I really don't know where to start. For one thing, I have had many of the symptoms of Celiac for many years. It goes back to pregnancy 14 years ago. I had major platelet problems during pregnancy and child birth....then within a year was diagnosed lactose intolerant. From there, I can't remember ever really feeling good again. I just thought it was due to the change in my body but I developed all kinds of stomach pains, seemed like no matter what I ate never really sat right. In addition I developed all kinds of allergies and Asthma! Anyway.... fast forward about 11 years or so and I decided to try the Atkins diet to drop 10 pounds before a vacation. Well... I felt GREAT! I couldn't believe it. I haven't felt so good in years. I continued with the low carb diet for the next 2 years, "cheating" on weekends but being very good during the week. I never felt great when I would cheat....but in my head thought it was worth it and it was probably just due to my body not being used to the carbs anymore. Anyway... to try to make a long story short... even cheating only on weekends was still making me wonder about other symptoms. I have ITP an autoimmune disease of low platelets, in addition I am 36 and have very low bone density, I also have MANY of the stomach symptoms listed on all the sites for Celiac. So... not only all that, but my mother has ALL THE SAME THINGS. Not so much the gut issues, but the low bone density and the ITP, which is very unusual. So, we decided to have the blood work done. Her's came out positive, but mine was negative. I believe it was mainly due to my low carb diet for the past 2 years. I wasn't consuming a normal amount of gluten when I had the blood work done, I was still on the low carb diet and only had the occasional weekend cheat.... so, my doctor has recommended the biopsy. Due to the fact that my mother has tested positive through the blood test and I have so many symptoms. My question/problem is.... he told me to eat a "regular" diet for 6 weeks before the test. First of all, what is regular???? I have read so many things, some say a minimum of 2 slices of bread a day, others say 4. Some say minimum of 6 weeks others say 12. My fear is that I will have the test done and it will come back negative due to the fact that it hasn't caused enough damage in the amount of time he has given me. Unfortunately, I can NOT handle eating this way for longer than the 6 weeks. I'm counting down the days at this point...... it has made me feel awful 24 hours a day. Since I can never give my body a break for a day, I never feel good. I am so bloated, have neck and back pain, major stomach pain and almost a feeling of MSG...not sure if anyone can relate...but kind of heart racing kind of feeling. I'm looking for opinions from any of you that have been through the gluten challenge that can help me through this. I'm worried that if the test is negative....that's it and I won't really ever know. Have any of you been through it and if so... how long did you eat the gluten products before your biopsy? And did it come back positive? I truly believe I have Celiac......... but I am one of those people that would really like an official diagnosis. Please help......

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

I asked for a skin biopsy because of a DH-type rash. The biopsy came back negative (this might have been because it was done 3 weeks after 1)going off gluten and 2) a 10-day course of prednisone). The fact that it came back negative doesn't bother me so much. What bothers me is that the biopsy sites did not heal well--they itch like mad (4 months after the biopsy!) , and are hardened with quite a lot of scar tissue. They are also still quite red, and if I wear a T-shirt (it was on my arms), people look like they're really grossed out by the sight of my arm. In 20-20 hindsight, I would not do it again. Biopsies don't necessarily heal well--but I didn't know that at the time.

Guest nini

I didn't have a biopsy at all, Dr. said it wasn't needed cos my antibodies were sooooo high that there was no doubt, that and the fact that I've responded miraculously to the diet and feel terrible when exposed to even a molecule of gluten, I know for sure I have Celiac. My daughter's blood test was negative but with genetic predisposition (ME) and extremely positive dietary response, We are also convinced she has it as well. In my personal opinion biopsies are irrelevent. They can only confirm the dx IF you are consuming enough gluten IF the Dr. takes enough samples, IF the Dr. takes samples from damaged areas and IF the Lab knows how to read the test results... too many IF's for me. Listen to your bodies, if you feel better off gluten then by all means, stay off gluten. It's that simple.

CarlaB Enthusiast

CarolAnn, you sound just like me. I had figured out about carbs causing my troubles, then cut them out, not to lose weight, but because my joint pain would go away. So, after years not eating much wheat, my blood test came out negative. I tortured myself with the 6 weeks, and it still came out negative. I was so sick by the end I could hardly get out of bed. Looking back, I find it almost humorous that I felt it necessary to have the biopsy while it was quite obvious what was making me sick!!! I think we are all conditioned to feel like we need a doctor to tell us we're ill.

I did end up testing with Enterolab because their tests are more sensitive. I also got the genetic testing from them. They didn't tell me anything I didn't know, but I knew for sure it was really a life-long gluten problem, not just an allergy which might allow me to eat some occassionally. It also let me know that all my kids have the genetic tendency to the same problem.

Nancym Enthusiast
My older sister was diagnosed with celiac sprue post pregnancy about 6 years ago with blood test and biopsy, she "cheats" frequently and contacts wheat all the time.

Well, it depends on you. Your sister had postive diagnosis and still can't stay gluten free. Some people can go gluten-free without a positive diagnosis, just based on their own dietary testing. What does it take for you to make the changes you need to make? Someone in a white lab coat? Lots of people can't even adhere to the diet with a biopsy.

That was the question I asked myself. Do I know my body better than the guy in the lab coat?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,676
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    AW1851
    Newest Member
    AW1851
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • Scott Adams
      Welcome to the community! Generally, for a gluten challenge before celiac disease blood tests, Tylenol (acetaminophen) is considered safe and should not interfere with your antibody results. The medications you typically need to avoid are those like ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) or naproxen (Aleve) that can cause intestinal irritation, which could potentially complicate the interpretation of an endoscopy if you were to have one. However, it is absolutely crucial that you confirm this with either your gastroenterologist or your surgeon before your procedure. They know the specifics of your case and can give you the definitive green light, ensuring your surgery is comfortable and your celiac testing remains accurate. Best of luck with your surgery tomorrow
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.