Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Wait Or Take A Different Route?


lob6796

Recommended Posts

lob6796 Contributor

I got the letter today with my appointment for the GI specialist. My CONSULT with him is scheduled for Aug 23!!! So I would have to wait for the consult, then he is going to order more blood work, wait for those results, have another consult, then schedule the biopsy, then go to the followup appt, and THEN I can go gluten free. I could be looking at not being able to start a gluten free diet until November. I am going to call my primary on Tuesday to discuss things with him. Is it worth it to get the biopsy? I just want to start feeling better. It's frustrating me that I know what I can do to start healing (gluten free) but I'm not allowed to do it. Any advice?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



missy'smom Collaborator

I can't tell you what to do but can just share my experience and that of my sister. I didn't go through testing because of a move and knowing it would take me forever to find a Dr. and get testing done in a new city, not knowing anyone. I needed to feel better fast to cope with all the changes and survive everyday. Before I moved I had a Dr. tell me he thought I had celiac disease and after I moved and seeing the Celiac Sprue Association checklist of symptoms and trying gluten-free and seeing miraculous improvement that was enough for me. I have had experience with another very restrictive diet(gestational diabetes) and have good coping skills.

I have strongly encouraged my sister who clearly has celiac disease, to persue testing(and she is) because she is the kind of person who needs proof to be able to commit to a lifelong restrictive diet(and she would agree). Plus she has some possibly related serious health issues that she may need additional testing and Dr.'s help with. Additionally, she is lucky enough to have a celiac disease clinic nearby. With her set of circumstances, testing is the way to go.

There are others here who have been through testing and may offer their perspective.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,199
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Carlos Burbano
    Newest Member
    Carlos Burbano
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
    • trents
      @JettaGirl, "Coeliac" is the British spelling of "celiac". Same disease. 
    • JettaGirl
      This may sound ridiculous but is this supposed to say Celiacs? I looked up Coeliacs because you never know, there’s a lot of diseases related to a disease that they come up with similar names for. It’s probably meant to say Celiacs but I just wanted to confirm.
    • JoJo0611
      I was told it was to see how much damage has been caused. But just told CT with contrast not any other name for it. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.