Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Iga Testing Question. Have Test Ordered & Want To Make Sure It's The Right One


holiday16

Recommended Posts

holiday16 Enthusiast

I'm getting my blood drawn to check for IGA deficiency. They could not find the test listed under total serum IGA or total IGA, but it seems to be listed as Immunoglobulin A (IGA). That is what the order is for and I would like to double check and make sure it's right. I think it is, but would feel better if someone here could verify it for me :o)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



NY547 Newbie

Yes, IgA or total IgA is short for immunoglobulin A. It tests for your body's ability overall production of the IgA class of antibodies. If you do not produce them anyway, it definately will make the celiac tests for IgA (gliadin and tissue transglutaminase) come back negative, but you could still have celiac,

If this is the case, many labs will reflect the celiac panel to include gliadin IgG and TTg IgG to check for an IgG response. Some labs still routinely check for the IgGs as part of the routine celiac panel.

You are wise to have them check for total IgA as not all labs and Dr's offices perform it as part of a regular celiac screen.

holiday16 Enthusiast
Yes, IgA or total IgA is short for immunoglobulin A. It tests for your body's ability overall production of the IgA class of antibodies. If you do not produce them anyway, it definately will make the celiac tests for IgA (gliadin and tissue transglutaminase) come back negative, but you could still have celiac,

If this is the case, many labs will reflect the celiac panel to include gliadin IgG and TTg IgG to check for an IgG response. Some labs still routinely check for the IgGs as part of the routine celiac panel.

You are wise to have them check for total IgA as not all labs and Dr's offices perform it as part of a regular celiac screen.

Thank you for your reply. I actually had the celiac panel done 4 years ago which tested for the IgG as well which came back negative and then I tested positive through Enterolab last Nov. In some ways I wish I had run the celiac panel again since it was so long ago, but when I began to cut out all gluten I realized I wasn't eating all that much in the first place and I wonder if that's part of why it was negative. I'm having the IGA tested because it appears there could be a genetic tendency in our family toward low IGA which would skew even the results from Enterolab. Our insurance won't cover the IGA test unless you have the panel done first without it and then if that's negative you can have the IGA test done which is frustrating. So in some ways I'm ordering it for other family members as well as myself. My kids are getting tested and if my IGA comes back low that would be something to take into account. Even if mine comes back normal I'm pushing my sister and mother to get tested as well. My sister had a saliva IGA come back low so she is really supposed to go in and check for IGA deficiency.

Cutting out gluten for me has made a dramatic improvement so there's no doubt that was what was making me so sick which started after I had my youngest daughter. She has it as well, but was diagnosed on symptoms alone since she improved so much after we started eating gluten free. Now we're working on checking the other two kids. I'm really trying to get the best diagnosis for them that I can esp. for my 13 year old since I know if she has it she needs quite a bit of incentive to not cheat. It's certainly not an easy diet for a teen to follow!

Thanks again for confirming that is the right test. Guess I'll go in and have it drawn tomorrow.

NY547 Newbie

You're welcome!

My daughter also had negative blood work and positive results with enterolab. About 4 years ago her Total IgA was just under the normal range, but not enough to be considered a true deficiency. We had it checked again and her #s are a little higher, but still on the low side of the normal range. The IgA test has differant ranges for differant ages. I also wonder if the celiac markers corrsepond to the total amount of antibodies being produced.

My daughter is 15. She also gets much better on the gluten-free diet, but without a definitive diagnosis, she will never stick with it. Also keep in mind that the TTg and gliadin tests correspond to the amount of damge already done to the intestines. The blood tests will often be negative until substantial damage has occured. There have been studies done which show that many people with only partial villous atrophy test negative on blood tests.

When we tested with enterolab, her antibodies were positive, but the fecal fat score was still within the normal range, showing she is having a reaction to gluten, but has no damage yet. In the fall I may retest with enterolab and if her fat score has increased, then I will have the endoscopy done. Until then, she eats normally and when she gets her bouts of illness, or "crashes" as she calls it, I put her on a gluten-free diet for a week or 2. She is always better within a couple days. This approach saved her just prior to taking her finals.

Good luck to you and your family. I agree, it is definately not easy for a teenager to stick to the gluten-free diet. It will be a great day when they can positively diagnose people without waiting for the damage to be done!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - AlwaysLearning replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Gluten related ??

    2. - Colleen H replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Gluten related ??

    3. - Jmartes71 replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    4. - AlwaysLearning replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    5. - AlwaysLearning replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Gluten related ??


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,084
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    bigwave
    Newest Member
    bigwave
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • AlwaysLearning
      Get tested for vitamin deficiencies.  Though neuropathy can be a symptom of celiac, it can also be caused by deficiencies due to poor digestion caused by celiac and could be easier to treat.
    • Colleen H
      Thank you so much for your response  Yes it seems as though things get very painful as time goes on.  I'm not eating gluten as far as I know.  However, I'm not sure of cross contamination.  My system seems to weaken to hidden spices and other possibilities. ???  if cross contamination is possible...I am in a super sensitive mode of celiac disease.. Neuropathy from head to toes
    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.