Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Those Of You On A gluten-free Diet And Retested


Worriedtodeath

Recommended Posts

Worriedtodeath Enthusiast

HI!

I


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Worriedtodeath Enthusiast

Forgot to say that the Gluten-free Casein-free diet has been a miracle and that she has had the greatest height AND weigth increase in over a year according to the ped. THe diet is working and working great. Hubby and the ped would like a REASON now as to WHY and one that can be confirmed and duplicated and you know how scientists are. There is always a reason and that reason should be reproduced without fail. I say that is a pipe dream with this disease and unobtainable.

Thanks

Stacie

gfp Enthusiast
Hubby is just concerned that we are missing what really caused her to be sick and that perhaps gluten really wasn
Worriedtodeath Enthusiast

That's what I've tried to explain to hubby. If it is something else, then wouldn't it still be here somewhere??? Wouldn't we still have tummy issues or something to indicate that gluten isn't the cause? You don't remove gluten, have a 100% improvement and no other issues at all and it not be gluten. That's why I thought of the panel test. If other drs use it somehow then maybe we can too. I know our gi won't so I have to find someone else for the ped to listen to. OR deal with this everytime we go to the ped.

gfp Enthusiast

The problem is this can go on forever.

There are plenty of biopsy positive people who got told they would "grow out of it" ...

Baby has had 2 panels one in the very beginning that was ridiculously low and the other when on wheat 80 days that was higher but still not anywhere close to positive numbers. Her very old school gi says you should have IGG and IGA and ttg readings
Worriedtodeath Enthusiast

Good Lord that is horrible! I would never be able to do that. CC alone should be enough to let you know you still have a problem or at least with us it does. I just wish I had something with what we all ready have that could be of use somehow. I did discover my old upper and lower gi's presented with what now would be considered early Celiac's but way back in the dark ages no one took samples and no one had ever heard of gluten to make that dx.

Hopefully someone will begin develop a new "normal" for babies in those biopsies.

Thanks

Stacie

kbtoyssni Contributor

You'd have to feed that kid gluten for a looonnnngg time to hope to get a positive now. Like a year or two??? It's stupid to make anyone sick for a long period of time just for an official test. Especially a kid who is still growing and developing right now. You could try enterolab testing - that's still good for up to a year after going gluten-free. Otherwise you could do a gene test - it won't confirm or eliminate celiac, but if she does have one of the known genes, maybe that's enough to convince your husband?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



aaron&sam Rookie

This is what I think based on my personal experiences!

I would continue with your daughter's gluten-free diet! Her growth and development depend on her body's ability to absorb nutrients, if she happy, healthy and growing normally than you should not change anything! Maybe at another time in her life when growth and development are not so critical, you could investigate finding an official diagnosis!

My children have growth delay problems and I know that they would be sooooo much healthier if we had just known about Celiac disease about ten years ago!

gfp Enthusiast
You'd have to feed that kid gluten for a looonnnngg time to hope to get a positive now. Like a year or two??? It's stupid to make anyone sick for a long period of time just for an official test. Especially a kid who is still growing and developing right now. You could try enterolab testing - that's still good for up to a year after going gluten-free. Otherwise you could do a gene test - it won't confirm or eliminate celiac, but if she does have one of the known genes, maybe that's enough to convince your husband?

It seems to methat since babies are growing so quickly they repair much more quickly. As we get older our repair system slows down but for a baby the damage may repair as fast as it is made. This means the biopsy is much more tricky since the villi are repairing as fast as they are damaged and its much more tricky (need more luck) to find them damaged.. . This doesn't mean however damage is not being done.

As kbtoyssni say's this is such a critical time ... whymes about and take risks?

Takala Enthusiast

Yeah, I "know" how scientists are. <_<

In science, one observes a condition.

One comes up with a hypothesis as to what could be the cause of the condition.

The hypothesis is based on observations of other things

The hypothesis is tested out by experimenting

The results are noted

If the hypothesis is correct, the testing situation shows that changing something A has result B

If the hypotheis is not correct, the testing situation shows that changing something A has had no change

(there is a margin of error or a tolerance of + or - , but we won't go into that detail much now )

It is important for the other variables not to change during the experimental testing

it is important to document the changes that were observed

If it were just a scientific test, then the results should be able to be documented in other situations, if the test was being used to prove a theory

If the theory is already proven, and the results documented, them running the test again trying to disprove the observed result, or verify the result further, is okay if you're talking about scientific inquiry for the sake of research but really rather stupid if you're talking about the health status of a very small child.

go back to, it is important to document the changes that were observed.

Sounds like somebody missed that part, so I'd be asking him what his "issues" are.

The doctors just exist to run tests, and he's stuck in that rut of trying to generate revenues by ordering tests over and over again. Whether or not he is capable of making a correct diagnosis will not make your child have or not have a gluten sensitivity, the two things are not cause and effect no matter what. Gluten sensitivity is not the same thing as full blown Celiac. It takes different individuals different amounts of time to develop full blown auto immune disease from the time of initial exposure to wheat, rye, and barley glutens. This is because of many factors, such as their genes, enviroment, triggering infections, exposures, type of diet consumed, etc.

Your child is only 2.

Some people go for decades before their symptoms become acute enough for test results to show antibodies and damaged intestines.

It's been decades since I learned this "science" stuff and I just typed it all down from memory, so I may have not listed it in the perfectly correct jargon, but you get the idea.

There is one more thing to note. The current treatment, just eliminating gluten from the diet, has absolutely no harmful side effects whatsoever, other than the nuisance factor in terms of interacting with others in public. That and having to be careful in the home of cross contamination.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Atl222's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      Increased intraepithelial lymphocytes after 10 yrs gluten-free

    2. - Scott Adams replied to Aretaeus Cappadocia's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Brown Rice Vinegar (organic) from Eden Foods is likely gluten free

    3. - Scott Adams replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      nothing has changed

    4. - Scott Adams commented on knitty kitty's blog entry in Thiamine Thiamine Thiamine
      1

      About Celiac Remission

    5. - Scott Adams replied to TheDHhurts's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      2

      need help understanding testing result for Naked Nutrition Creatine please

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,190
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Atl222
    Newest Member
    Atl222
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @Atl222! Yes, your increased lymphocytes could be in response to oats or it could possibly be cross contamination from gluten that is getting into your diet from some unexpected source but not enough to damage the villi. And I'm certain that increased lymphocytes can be caused by other things besides celiac disease or gluten/oats exposure. See attachment. But you might try eliminating oats to start with and possibly dairy for a few months and then seek another endoscopy/biopsy to see if there was a reduction in lymphocyte counts. 
    • Scott Adams
      This is a solid, well-reasoned approach. You’re right that “koji” by itself doesn’t indicate gluten status, and the risk really does come down to which grain is used to culture it. The fact that you directly contacted Eden Foods and received a clear statement that their koji is made from rice only, with no wheat or barley, is meaningful due diligence—especially since Eden has a long-standing reputation for transparency. While the lack of gluten labeling can understandably give pause, manufacturer confirmation like this is often what people rely on for traditionally fermented products. As always, trusting your body after trying it is reasonable, but based on the information you gathered, your conclusion makes sense.
    • Scott Adams
      Seven months can still be early in celiac healing, especially if you were mostly asymptomatic to begin with—symptoms like low iron, vitamin D deficiency, nail changes, and hair issues often take much longer to improve because the gut needs time to recover before absorption normalizes. A tTG-IgA of 69 is not “low” in terms of immune activity, and it can take 12–24 months (sometimes longer) for antibodies and the intestinal lining to fully heal, particularly in teens and young adults. Eating gluten again to “test” things isn’t recommended and won’t give you clear answers—it’s far more likely to cause harm than clarity. Weight not changing is also very common in celiac and doesn’t rule anything out. Please know that your frustration and sadness matter; this adjustment is hard, and feeling stuck can really affect mental health. You deserve support, and if you can, reaching out to a GI dietitian or mental health professional familiar with chronic illness could really help you through this phase. This study indicates that a majority of celiacs don't recover until 5 years after diagnosis and starting a gluten-free diet: Mucosal recovery and mortality in adults with celiac disease after treatment with a gluten-free diet However, it's also possible that what the study really shows is the difficulty in maintaining a 100% gluten-free diet. I suspect that if you looked closely at the diets of those who did not recover within 2 years might be that their diets were not 100% gluten-free. Perhaps they ate out more often, or didn't understand all of the hidden ingredients where gluten can hide. Either way, it shows how difficult recovery from celiac disease can be for most people. According to this study: This article explores other causes of flattened villi:    
    • Scott Adams
      Gluten testing is normally reported in ppm (parts per million), which is equivalent to mg/kg, not micrograms by itself. A result of <0.025 mcg only becomes meaningful if you know the sample size tested (for example, mcg per gram or per kg). If that value represents <0.025 mcg per gram, that would equal <25 ppm, which is above the gluten-free threshold; if it’s <0.025 mcg per kilogram, it would be extremely low and well within GF limits. Without the denominator, the result is incomplete. It’s reasonable to follow up with the company and ask them to confirm the result in ppm using a validated method (like ELISA R5)—that’s the standard used to assess gluten safety.
    • Scott Adams
      Medication sensitivity is very real for many people with celiac and other autoimmune conditions, and it’s frustrating when that’s brushed off. Even when a medication is technically gluten-free, fillers, dose changes, or how your nervous system reacts—especially with things like gabapentin—can cause paradoxical effects like feeling wired but exhausted. The fact that it helped bloating suggests it may be affecting gut–nerve signaling, which makes sense in the context of SIBO, but that doesn’t mean the side effects should be ignored. You’re carrying a heavy load right now with ongoing skin, eye, and neurological uncertainty, and living in that kind of limbo is exhausting on its own. It’s understandable to feel overwhelmed and discouraged when systems and providers don’t meet you where you are—your experience is valid, and continuing to advocate for yourself, even when it’s hard, really does matter. You can search this site for prescriptions medications, but will need to know the manufacturer/maker if there is more than one, especially if you use a generic version of the medication: To see the ingredients you will need to click on the correct version of the medication and maker in the results, then scroll down to "Ingredients and Appearance" and click it, and then look at "Inactive Ingredients," as any gluten ingredients would likely appear there, rather than in the Active Ingredients area. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.