Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

New With Questions On Getting A Diagnosis


joyinc

Recommended Posts

joyinc Newbie

Hi there!

this is my first post, and I thought that I would jump right in and introduce myself here. I was asking about celiac diagnosis on another website and someone was kind enough to direct me over here. I never thought that I would be celiac, because I thought that it was always terrible stomach pains after eating something with gluten in it. I support someone at work with celiac, so I have been reading more, and found out that it can have no stomach upset, but could cause brain fog, irritability, depression, lactose intolerance, nutritional deficiencies, and a whole mess of other things. I am basically all those things, and I already know that when i stop eating things with gluten in it, that I feel so much better.

However... its hard to stay away from them and i crave foods like that most of the time! So, I figure that if I had a diagnosis of celiac, that would be more serious because of the damage i could do over the long run.

So I went to my doc today and asked for some testing to be done. She wrote me up a script and told me that if i had an intolerance that it would show up 60% of the time, but if i was celiac, the test would show a 100% marker, or something to that effect. Yet from what I read about blood tests for celiac, they dont sound all that reliable. She wrote me a lab form that says: IgA tissue transgluteminase antibody (celiac), and she also checked off a box marked CBC.

Are these the tests that are faulty?

And another thing... I have been avoiding gluten and I hear that I need to be eating it for the test to pick up anything. Someone told me for about a month? Should I wait a month of going back to eating gluten to take the blood tests?

She told me that if something comes up with the blood tests that she would send me to a gastro-intestinal specialist for a biopsy.

I'm not really sure what else to do, and would really LOVE some advice.

Thanks so much!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Aleshia Contributor
So I went to my doc today and asked for some testing to be done. She wrote me up a script and told me that if i had an intolerance that it would show up 60% of the time, but if i was celiac, the test would show a 100% marker, or something to that effect. Yet from what I read about blood tests for celiac, they dont sound all that reliable. She wrote me a lab form that says: IgA tissue transgluteminase antibody (celiac), and she also checked off a box marked CBC.

she should have done the whole celiac panel... I think there are 3 tests in it (?) Open Original Shared Link

CBC is your complete blood count... to look for anemia etc.

someone else can answer your questions better than me though as I'm new to this too and haven't been diagnosed yet

joyinc Newbie

hmmm, now i dont know if i should go back and ask for the rest of the tests, or just go for the one. i am totally second guessing myself right now, cause i have eaten a bagel every day for the past week and i feel ok. i was thinking that i would do that for a month for the test, would that be good enough ?

nora-n Rookie

ome experts say one needs to be back on gluten for six months, some at least 3 months or six weeks, and it is impossible to say.

And one then needs to eat a lot of gluten, 0,3 grams per kg, that would be 21 grams if you weigh 70 kg.

https://www.celiac.com/articles/12/1/How-lo...gful/Page1.html

and it is utterly nonsense to say that it is 100%. It is only about 80% or less positive even in total villous atrophy, which means you have no villi left anywhere. After some weeks you have only patchy damage and some will have a positive ttg test.......it might take years, or forever.

And, one ould still need the total IgA test as well.

nora

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,077
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Lindsay612
    Newest Member
    Lindsay612
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • RMJ
      I’m frustrated with celiac disease and my current gastroenterologist (GI). I’ve been gluten free for almost 13 years, with normal antibodies for almost 8 years - except for one excursion of my DGP IgA 5 years ago which returned to normal when I changed brands of gluten free flour. All 4 celiac antibodies were positive 13 years ago but I didn’t have an endoscopy for reasons unrelated to celiac disease.  I did have one 9 years ago. The DGP IgA was still slightly elevated, GI saw some blunted villi visually, biopsy showed “patchy mild increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes” and “focal mild villous blunting” (Marsh 3A). For the past few years I’ve had intermittent trouble with nausea and stomach pain so my current GI suggested doing a repeat endoscopy. He saw nothing visually, but biopsy showed “focal mild intraepithelial lymphocytosis” and “minimal focal villous blunting”.  All I got was a letter from the GI and his nurse that said there were mild changes consistent with celiac disease. I sent a message to the doctor asking where I go from here but just got an answer from a nurse saying it is better, less damage than 2016 so keep following the gluten free diet. So focal is better than patchy for increased lymphocytes and minimal focal is better than focal mild villi blunting? I feel this biopsy result after 13 years deserves some discussion, but this doctor never answers messages, his nurses just give out canned responses, it takes 6 months to get an appointment, and his only suggestion for nausea and pain was more soluble fiber. I’ve read that adults may not heal completely on a gluten free diet but with normal antibodies for years I was not expecting this result. I have made an appointment with a different GI who hopefully is more communicative. Rant over. Thanks for reading.
    • Pablohoyasaxa
      I was diagnosed with gluten sensitivity and a wheat allergy as a child in the early 1960s, . which I inherited from my father's DNA. My mom tried the best she could with both of us, but in those times health and allergies were kind of brushed aside.  I grew out of it, or so we thought, but the rashes reared their ugly heads while I was in college. Keg parties (wheat & gluten in beer and youthful reckess eating led to an outbreak. To the point, I am a 65 year old and now living with full blown celiac with dermatitis herpetiformis blisters that are just beginning to receed after being gluten-free for over 2 years at least. The lesions are so unsightly that I need to stay covered. Ive been living in South Florida and would love to wear shorts but people see the sores and thing I am a leper. Ive lost a lot of weigh from  stomach cramps and frequent bowel movements. Will this ever end!
    • StuartJ
      Unbranded - bought from a local Amish store
    • trents
      @StuartJ, what brand of gluten-free flour did she use?
    • StuartJ
      Well I'm pretty sure it was this one  https://www.mamaknowsglutenfree.com/wprm_print/homemade-gluten-free-bread-bread-machine-dairy-free-option
×
×
  • Create New...