Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

New With Questions On Getting A Diagnosis


joyinc

Recommended Posts

joyinc Newbie

Hi there!

this is my first post, and I thought that I would jump right in and introduce myself here. I was asking about celiac diagnosis on another website and someone was kind enough to direct me over here. I never thought that I would be celiac, because I thought that it was always terrible stomach pains after eating something with gluten in it. I support someone at work with celiac, so I have been reading more, and found out that it can have no stomach upset, but could cause brain fog, irritability, depression, lactose intolerance, nutritional deficiencies, and a whole mess of other things. I am basically all those things, and I already know that when i stop eating things with gluten in it, that I feel so much better.

However... its hard to stay away from them and i crave foods like that most of the time! So, I figure that if I had a diagnosis of celiac, that would be more serious because of the damage i could do over the long run.

So I went to my doc today and asked for some testing to be done. She wrote me up a script and told me that if i had an intolerance that it would show up 60% of the time, but if i was celiac, the test would show a 100% marker, or something to that effect. Yet from what I read about blood tests for celiac, they dont sound all that reliable. She wrote me a lab form that says: IgA tissue transgluteminase antibody (celiac), and she also checked off a box marked CBC.

Are these the tests that are faulty?

And another thing... I have been avoiding gluten and I hear that I need to be eating it for the test to pick up anything. Someone told me for about a month? Should I wait a month of going back to eating gluten to take the blood tests?

She told me that if something comes up with the blood tests that she would send me to a gastro-intestinal specialist for a biopsy.

I'm not really sure what else to do, and would really LOVE some advice.

Thanks so much!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Aleshia Contributor
So I went to my doc today and asked for some testing to be done. She wrote me up a script and told me that if i had an intolerance that it would show up 60% of the time, but if i was celiac, the test would show a 100% marker, or something to that effect. Yet from what I read about blood tests for celiac, they dont sound all that reliable. She wrote me a lab form that says: IgA tissue transgluteminase antibody (celiac), and she also checked off a box marked CBC.

she should have done the whole celiac panel... I think there are 3 tests in it (?) Open Original Shared Link

CBC is your complete blood count... to look for anemia etc.

someone else can answer your questions better than me though as I'm new to this too and haven't been diagnosed yet

joyinc Newbie

hmmm, now i dont know if i should go back and ask for the rest of the tests, or just go for the one. i am totally second guessing myself right now, cause i have eaten a bagel every day for the past week and i feel ok. i was thinking that i would do that for a month for the test, would that be good enough ?

nora-n Rookie

ome experts say one needs to be back on gluten for six months, some at least 3 months or six weeks, and it is impossible to say.

And one then needs to eat a lot of gluten, 0,3 grams per kg, that would be 21 grams if you weigh 70 kg.

https://www.celiac.com/articles/12/1/How-lo...gful/Page1.html

and it is utterly nonsense to say that it is 100%. It is only about 80% or less positive even in total villous atrophy, which means you have no villi left anywhere. After some weeks you have only patchy damage and some will have a positive ttg test.......it might take years, or forever.

And, one ould still need the total IgA test as well.

nora

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,205
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Paula5042
    Newest Member
    Paula5042
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Fayeb23
      Thank you that’s really helpful, hopeful won’t have to have a biopsy.
    • RMJ
      That means the normal range (i.e. not celiac disease) would be a result less than 14.99.  Your result is WAY above that. Some gastroenterologists would diagnose that as celiac disease even without a confirming biopsy because it is more than ten times the top of the normal range.
    • Redanafs
      Hi everyone. Back in 2022 I had blood work drawn for iga ext gliadin. Since then I’ve developed worse stomach issues and all other health issues. My doctor just said cut out gluten. He did no further testing. Please see my test results attached. I just need some direction cause I feel so ill and the stomach pain is becoming worse. Can this test show indications for other gastrointestinal diseases?
    • Fayeb23
      Thank you. These were the results TTG ABS NUMERICAL: > 250.0 U/mL [< 14.99]  Really don’t understand the results!
    • Scott Adams
      Clearly from what you've said the info on Dailymed is much more up to date than the other site, which hasn't been updated since 2017. The fact that some companies might be repackaging drugs does not mean the info on the ingredients is not correct.
×
×
  • Create New...