Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Ugh! England Labeling Frustrations


majicbunnies

Recommended Posts

majicbunnies Contributor

I have been thinking about moving to England after college. BUT, I think I've changed my mind. I just read up on their labeling laws (Open Original Shared Link) and just because the 'majority' of Celiacs don't react to a certain level doesn't mean that it's not affecting their body, and you should allow gluten at all in something that is supposed to be 'gluten free'!! I don't want it to be so risky. I'm super sensitive, but sometimes I don't notice gluten right away. What will happen in that case is during the next week or so, I'll get anxiety, 'D' sometimes, foggy brain, etc. I can't risk small amounts of gluten is my point. I'm super careful with my food, appliances, and cookware. I know my body doesn't like gluten so I don't want ANY in it. Even less than 200ppm, or whatever grams...

I guess I'm just ranting.

Is anyone else here as cautious as I am? I don't even allow myself vanilla made with grain alcohol. I got sick before when I ate a chocolate bar that seemed gluten-free. I called the company after I got 'D' and they said the vanilla contains 1% gluten from the alcohol it's extracted from (they said from the extract, but I'm assuming it's the alcohol they were talking about?), "but an employee we have who has Celiac isn't affected by it"... so?

It's not even about getting physically sick. I don't want my body having any gluten because I know that in some way, it is affecting my body weather I feel it or not. I don't allow myself distilled vinegar because I read an article saying that scientists wont admit distillation removes grain, because there are chances that gluten gets through. I always like to site my sources, but I don't have the article bookmarked!

They just have to get around leaving out wheat 100% because it saves them money and makes things 'taste better'.

bleh


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



MauriceReed Newbie

My understanding is that the U.K. has some of the best food labelling regulations that there are. Due to pressure form Coeliac U.K. food manufacturers clearly label products that contain Gluten and also foods which although they do not contain gluten are produced in a plant where other products do contain gluten and therefore there is a risk of cross-conrtamination.

If you go to www.coeliac.org.uk you will find lots of useful info about Coeliac awareness in the UK.

In your case you may be super-sensitive in relation to gluten but the majority aren't.

In comparing the UK to much of the rest of the world we at least aknowledge coeliac disease and even provide foods on presription through our National Health Service. So many other countries are years behind us or are not bothered about food labelling.

You say you are thinking of moving to England, may I ask where from?

gfp Enthusiast
just because the 'majority' of Celiacs don't react to a certain level doesn't mean that it's not affecting their body, and you should allow gluten at all in something that is supposed to be 'gluten free'!!

CUK are funded by the food companies....

It is convenient for the food companies to be able to call gluten-lite glutenfree.

There is NO evidence at all that this does not cause damage to any c(o)elaic...

In your case you may be super-sensitive in relation to gluten but the majority aren't.

there is NO evidence for this. CUK will not provide it nor back it up because they are paid for from the food manufacturers.

Besides: this defies all logic....

10 years ago diagosis was 1:5000 people... then it was good enough to say we should have gluten-free food.

Now CUK are saying (without any evidence) that if it makes a minority sick then its OK.

My understanding is that the U.K. has some of the best food labelling regulations that there are. Due to pressure form Coeliac U.K. food manufacturers clearly label products that contain Gluten and also foods which although they do not contain gluten are produced in a plant where other products do contain gluten and therefore there is a risk of cross-conrtamination.

CUK actively campaigned AGAINST better labelling because they said WE were too stupid to read it (well they actually said it was 'confusing')

CUK get paid for inclusions in their directory: CUK wanted everyone to have to use thier directory...

Evidence did exist: CUK partly sponsored the study.. when the study proved small amounts of gluten damaged celiacs they buried the study...

In comparing the UK to much of the rest of the world we at least aknowledge coeliac disease and even provide foods on presription through our National Health Service.

No we do not, almost all foods available on prescription are NOT gluten free (again thanks to CUK) but gluten free according to the Codex alimentarius

majicbunnies Contributor
CUK are funded by the food companies....

It is convenient for the food companies to be able to call gluten-lite glutenfree.

There is NO evidence at all that this does not cause damage to any c(o)elaic...

there is NO evidence for this. CUK will not provide it nor back it up because they are paid for from the food manufacturers.

Besides: this defies all logic....

10 years ago diagosis was 1:5000 people... then it was good enough to say we should have gluten-free food.

Now CUK are saying (without any evidence) that if it makes a minority sick then its OK.

CUK actively campaigned AGAINST better labelling because they said WE were too stupid to read it (well they actually said it was 'confusing')

CUK get paid for inclusions in their directory: CUK wanted everyone to have to use thier directory...

Evidence did exist: CUK partly sponsored the study.. when the study proved small amounts of gluten damaged celiacs they buried the study...

No we do not, almost all foods available on prescription are NOT gluten free (again thanks to CUK) but gluten free according to the Codex alimentarius

Thank you for your reply!

majicbunnies Contributor
My understanding is that the U.K. has some of the best food labelling regulations that there are. Due to pressure form Coeliac U.K. food manufacturers clearly label products that contain Gluten and also foods which although they do not contain gluten are produced in a plant where other products do contain gluten and therefore there is a risk of cross-conrtamination.

If you go to www.coeliac.org.uk you will find lots of useful info about Coeliac awareness in the UK.

In your case you may be super-sensitive in relation to gluten but the majority aren't.

In comparing the UK to much of the rest of the world we at least aknowledge coeliac disease and even provide foods on presription through our National Health Service. So many other countries are years behind us or are not bothered about food labelling.

You say you are thinking of moving to England, may I ask where from?

I just want so badly to have people realize that gluten free should mean ZERO amounts of gluten in a product!

Like I said, just because the majority of Celiacs aren't as sensitive, it doesn't mean their bodies aren't being affected when they don't get physical symptoms from ingesting gluten.

Right now I am in living in southern california. I just moved here from northern california (USA) and I like it, but I know someday I will want to move again.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,903
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LamFam
    Newest Member
    LamFam
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Xravith
      Yes, you are right. Indeed, I’ve been feeling anemic since the beginning of this week, and today I felt horrible during a lecture at the university, I was trembling a lot and felt all my body incredibly heavy, so I had to come back home. I’ll do a blood test tomorrow, but I’m just worried about the possibility of it coming back negative. I’ve been eating two cookies in the morning as my only source of gluten over the past two weeks—could that affect the final result?
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.