Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Do Non-gluten Flours Need Cooked?

one more mile

Recommended Posts

one more mile Contributor
one more mile
Posted

I know that there was some additive in white flour that makes it so that it is not good to eat raw. Any idea what it is?

Do other flours have the same stuff in them? If so what temperature do flours need cooked at to neutralize this stuff.

Last summer I messed around with raw foods and wanted to see If I could Make crackers with a food dehydrator.

I was thinking onions, buckwheat flour and flax seed and Quinta flour, brags aminos. I know the flour would not be considered raw but I would like to keep the other items as raw as possiable.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


bakingbarb Enthusiast
bakingbarb
Posted

Do you mean regular wheat/white flour? There is not an additive that is put in it but it isn't easy to digest raw in the first place.

Gluten free flours don't have stuff in them but they don't taste good, the bean flours are indigestible raw.

angieInCA Apprentice
angieInCA
Posted

Almond flour makes great baked crackers and I don't see where it would be bad to digest raw. Coconut flour might be a good one to add to the mix, Flax seed mill would be fine raw and Potato Starch is actually already cooked so you could use that. I think everything else would be very hard to digest in the raw form.

Janessa Rookie
Janessa
Posted

I think most raw crackers are sprouted, so I would use sprouted buckwheat ect

then I think it would be much more digestible

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,599
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Jose Mojena
    Newest Member
    Jose Mojena
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Alibu
      Waiting on biopsy after positive bloodwork, but also not really believing this is real

      By Alibu · Posted

      I was tested back in 2017 and my TTG-IGA was mildly elevated (an 11 with reference range <4) but my EMA was negative and biopsy was negative. Fast forward to 2 weeks ago where I was like y'know what, I still have so many symptoms and I'm always so sick, I should repeat this, thinking it was not going to be positive.  I also found out through 23 and me that I do have the HLA-DQ2.5 gene so I thought it would be good to repeat given my ongoing symptoms. Well my blood work came back with a ttg-iga level of 152.6 with a reference range of <15 and my EMA was positive and EMA titer was 1:10 with reference range of <1:5. I guess I'm nervous that I'm going to do the biopsy and it's going to be negative again, especially since I also had an endoscopy in 2020, not to look for celiac but just as a regular 5 year thing I do because of all my GI issues, and they didn't see anything then either. I have no idea how long the EMA has been positive but I'm wondering if it's very recent, if the biopsy will show damage and if so, if they'll say well the biopsy is the gold standard so it's not celiac? I of course am doing all the things to convince myself that it isn't real. Do a lot of people go through this? I think because back in 2017 my ttg-iga was elevated but not a huge amount and my EMA was negative and my biopsy was negative, I keep thinking this time it's going to be different. But this time my ttg-iga is 152.6 with reference range <15, and my EMA was positive. BUT, my titer is only 1:10 and I keep reading how most people here had a ttg-iga in the hundreds or thousands, and the EMA titer was much higher. So now I am convinced that it was a false positive and when they do the biopsy it'll be negative.
    • trents
      Found coffee or coffee pods that contain gluten

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @linnylou73! Are you claiming this based on a reaction or based upon actual testing?
    • linnylou73
      Found coffee or coffee pods that contain gluten

      By linnylou73 · Posted

      Sams club membermark columbian coffee is either cross contaminated or the pods contain gluten
    • KimMS
      Helping child go strict gluten-free and concerns about growth/height

      By KimMS · Posted

      Thank you! Very helpful.
    • Scott Adams
      Helping child go strict gluten-free and concerns about growth/height

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This varies a lot from person to person. I include foods that are not certified gluten-free but are labelled "gluten-free", while super sensitive people only use certified gluten-free. Both types of products have been found to contain gluten, so there are no guarantees either way: It you are in the super sensitive group, eating a whole foods based diet where you prepare everything is the safest bet, but it's also difficult. Eating out is the the most risky, even if a restaurant has a gluten-free menu. I also include items that are naturally gluten-free, for example refried beans, tuna, pasta sauces, salsas, etc., which have a low overall risk of contamination.
×
×
  • Create New...