Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Discussing Enterolab Lab Results With Doctor


lapentola

Recommended Posts

lapentola Rookie

I am preparing to discuss my daughter's enterolab results with her pediatrician, and I'm stressing out a little bit because of the validity issues surrounding enterolab's method of testing. We don't currently have insurance which is why I decided to have enterolab testing done in the first place. (Actually I was okay with putting her on a gluten free diet even before the testing was done, but the other side of my daughter's family refused to feed her gluten free foods until she was tested.) So now I am wondering if he will want to order more tests and if so, if you all think it would be necessary. I believe that it would be wise to tell my daughter that she should be gluten free at least until she's 18 or so (to make sure that she develops properly) and at that time it might be appropriate to do more testing. I fear that giving her gluten in childhood could cause problems to slowly build up over time, as they did in me, and I just don't think that it is that difficult, or in the least bit unhealthy, to eat gluten free. (I'm a stay at home mom, I love to cook and bake, and I cook foods for her to take to her relatives houses.) So, even with these test results I have family (and probably soon to come , a doctor) who thinks that I'm being reckless with my daughters well being. Am I jumping the gun? Would you have more testing done if the doctor recommends it? If further testing indicates that she shouldn't be gluten free would you keep your child off gluten anyway, just to be safe?

I look forward to hearing your opinions. Thanks!

Here are her test results from enterolab... (She's 11, by the way)

Fecal Anti-gliadin IgA 212 Units (Normal Range <10 Units)

Fecal Anti-tissue Transglutaminase IgA 123 Units (Normal Range <10 Units)

Quantitative Microscopic Fecal Fat Score <300 Units (Normal Range <300 Units)

Fecal Anti-casein (cow


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyberprof Enthusiast
I am preparing to discuss my daughter's enterolab results with her pediatrician, and I'm stressing out a little bit because of the validity issues surrounding enterolab's method of testing. We don't currently have insurance which is why I decided to have enterolab testing done in the first place. (Actually I was okay with putting her on a gluten free diet even before the testing was done, but the other side of my daughter's family refused to feed her gluten free foods until she was tested.) So now I am wondering if he will want to order more tests and if so, if you all think it would be necessary. I believe that it would be wise to tell my daughter that she should be gluten free at least until she's 18 or so (to make sure that she develops properly) and at that time it might be appropriate to do more testing. I fear that giving her gluten in childhood could cause problems to slowly build up over time, as they did in me, and I just don't think that it is that difficult, or in the least bit unhealthy, to eat gluten free. (I'm a stay at home mom, I love to cook and bake, and I cook foods for her to take to her relatives houses.) So, even with these test results I have family (and probably soon to come , a doctor) who thinks that I'm being reckless with my daughters well being. Am I jumping the gun? Would you have more testing done if the doctor recommends it? If further testing indicates that she shouldn't be gluten free would you keep your child off gluten anyway, just to be safe?

I look forward to hearing your opinions. Thanks!

I don't think you're jumping the gun. And yes, I would keep her off gluten until she is 18 even if the doc's tests are negative.

I guess the question is...What do you want the pediatrician to do? Is she generally healthy otherwise? Pediatricians and doctors in general will not look kindly on Enterolab, unless you get really lucky. I did not discuss Enterolab with my son's pediatrician, only told them that we had his genes tested and he has the celiac gene and that I was diagnosed with celiac. I assume that you are diagnosed or someone in the family is?

If she is having other health issues then you may have to tell the doc your worries. But going gluten-free, as you've said, is the best way to prevent problems from building up.

We've told our son that he can do a gluten challenge when he's 21 or when he's done growing and can do the EDG then if he wants.

Good luck to you!

Jestgar Rising Star

You bring in the test results, and you tell the doc that you will be keeping her off gluten, and that these results support your discoveries that your daughter is much healthier when she doesn't eat gluten. Tell him that you'll expect his support in keeping her healthy while on this (high vegetable, low processed foods) diet.

IF he still questions your conclusions, ask HIM to explain why your daughter is making so many antibodies to gluten, as shown by the Enterolab tests.

It's your child. You call the shots.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,741
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kaz 1
    Newest Member
    Kaz 1
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Theresa2407
      Maybe you have a low  intolerance to Wheat.   Rye, Barley and Malt are the gluten in Celiac disease.  It has always been stated Wheat and Gluten, not just a Wheat intolerance.  Barley will keep me in bed for (2) weeks.  Gut, Migrains, Brain fog, Diahrea.  It is miserable.  And when I was a toddler the doctor would give me a malt medicine because I always had Anemia and did not grow.  Boy was he off.  But at that time the US didn't know anyone about Celiac.  This was the 1940s and 50s.  I had my first episode at 9 months and did not get a diagnosis until I was 50.  My immune system was so shot before being diagnoised, so now I live with the consequences of it. I was so upset when Manufacturers didn't want to label their products so they added barley to the product.  It was mostly the cereal industry.  3 of my favorite cereals were excluded because of this. Malt gives me a bad Gut reaction.
    • Gigi2025
      Thanks much Scott.  Well said, and heeded.   I don't have Celiac, which is fortunate.
    • Scott Adams
      Do you have the results of your endoscopy? Did you do a celiac disease blood panel before that?  Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      It is odd that your Tissue Transglutaminase (TTG) IgA level has bounced from the "inconclusive" range (7.9, 9.8) down to a negative level (5.3), only to climb back up near the positive threshold. This inconsistency, coupled with your ongoing symptoms of malabsorption and specific nutrient deficiencies, is a strong clinical indicator that warrants a more thorough investigation than a simple "satisfactory" sign-off. A negative blood test does not definitively rule out celiac disease, especially with such variable numbers and a classic symptomatic picture. You are absolutely right to seek a second opinion and push for a referral to a gastroenterologist. A biopsy remains the gold standard for a reason, and advocating for one is the most direct path to getting the answers you need to finally address the root cause of your suffering. Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      There is a distinction between gluten itself and the other chemicals and processing methods involved in modern food production. Your experience in Italy and Greece, contrasted with your reactions in the U.S., provides powerful anecdotal evidence that the problem, for some people, may not be the wheat, but the additives like potassium bromate and the industrial processing it undergoes here. The point about bromines displacing iodine and disrupting thyroid function is a significant one, explaining a potential biological mechanism for why such additives could cause systemic health issues that mimic gluten sensitivity. It's both alarming and insightful to consider that the very "watchdog" agencies meant to protect us are allowing practices banned in many other developed countries. Seeking out European flour and your caution about the high-carb, potentially diabeticgenic nature of many gluten-free products are excellent practical takeaways from your research, but I just want to mention--if you have celiac disease you need to avoid all wheat, including all wheat and gluten in Europe.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.