Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is This A Symptom?


LadyBugLuv

Recommended Posts

LadyBugLuv Rookie

Just wondering...

I had lost about 20lbs 2 years ago or so, and it was then that I developed 4 vertical red lines on my lower abdomen. Since then I've developed a lot more. I did put the weight on, and off again. But they didn't develop when I gained weight, but lost it. Odd. Almost remind me of when someone has a baby, but I never have been pregnant, and am currently not pregnant.

I have recently been diagnosed w/ antibodies against gliadin (gluten), and though it was through a saliva test, was told that that is celiac. I have not had blood work.

I remember, several years back, I worked w/ a girl who was diagnosed w/ celiac, and she was super skinny, and she complained about her stretch marks on her abdomen (she even showed me). Mine look similar.

Just wasn't sure if this was a random thing, or was related to celiac.

thanks for your feedback :).


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



SLB5757 Enthusiast

I had this for quite some time post baby. My son is now 4, and I do not see this at all. I wouldn't say it was a Stretch Mark however. Just a reddish line that ran all the way down to my pubic bone. It seemed like it took forever to go away - maybe a few years. If you have any young children - maybe it is just the hormone levels in your body still a little elevated from childbirth (my novice advice).

LadyBugLuv Rookie
I had this for quite some time post baby. My son is now 4, and I do not see this at all. I wouldn't say it was a Stretch Mark however. Just a reddish line that ran all the way down to my pubic bone. It seemed like it took forever to go away - maybe a few years. If you have any young children - maybe it is just the hormone levels in your body still a little elevated from childbirth (my novice advice).

Well, thanks....

there are quite a few of them, and no, no children :). No miscarriages either.

I was on bc, and was having major issues w/ that, and stopped about a year ago. they started when I was on it. but I had been on it for a while, (2.5 years or a little more at that point... started it when I got married).

thanks :)

julirama723 Contributor

Sounds like stretch marks to me. I do not know if there is a correlation between celiac and stretch marks.

You don't have to have had children, or even be overweight to get them. It has a lot to do with genetics and skin elasticity. I first got stretch marks on my breasts during puberty--I guess they grew too quickly for my skin to "stretch" safely? I also have a ton of stretch marks from losing a massive amount of weight (roughly 100 pounds.) I've never had a baby.

You don't notice stretch marks when you gain weight, you notice them when you lose it. It's just like worn-out elastic; you can't tell that it isn't stretchy anymore until it's held slack. Stretch marks first appear red or pink, and generally will fade to a whitish/translucent/opalescent color. If you have pale skin, they appear more red, if you tan, they appear more white.

I know that there are a few things that supposedly help decrease the visibility of stretch marks. Try rubbing cocoa butter on them. A technique called dry brushing also is reputed to work; even if it doesn't make stretch marks less visible it has many other benefits. Also, stay hydrated, and consume good fats.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,202
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    PatBurnham
    Newest Member
    PatBurnham
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.