Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Biopsy Wait Time In Ontario

Smoly

Recommended Posts

Smoly Rookie
Smoly
Posted

I was just wondering how long people usually have to wait to have a biopsy done after their initial appointment with a gastroenterologist? I've waited 4 months to see the gastro and am curious about how much I might have to wait to get a possible diagnosis (or at least be able to start a gluten-free trial). Thanks.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Reba32 Rookie
Reba32
Posted

I have no idea how long wait times are in Ontario but it is not recommended to go gluten free until you've had the biopsy and blood tests. Even a week or 2 off gluten can skew the tests in the negative.

There are ways to work the system though. If you already have an appointment set up for months in advance, just call the office and ask to be put on their "wait list". There's ALWAYS a wait list that they use for when someone cancels an appointment in advance. They may be able to work you in quicker if you ask them about it and tell them you're willing to be there with short notice.

I did that a few years ago when I needed to have an ovarian cyst removed. They had me on the schedule for 3 months away, but I asked to be put on "the list" and the following week they called me and got me in. It may not always be that quick, but you may just luck out and get in there quicker than 4 months!

Good luck!

Smoly Rookie
Smoly
Posted
  • Author

I have no idea how long wait times are in Ontario but it is not recommended to go gluten free until you've had the biopsy and blood tests. Even a week or 2 off gluten can skew the tests in the negative.

There are ways to work the system though. If you already have an appointment set up for months in advance, just call the office and ask to be put on their "wait list". There's ALWAYS a wait list that they use for when someone cancels an appointment in advance. They may be able to work you in quicker if you ask them about it and tell them you're willing to be there with short notice.

I did that a few years ago when I needed to have an ovarian cyst removed. They had me on the schedule for 3 months away, but I asked to be put on "the list" and the following week they called me and got me in. It may not always be that quick, but you may just luck out and get in there quicker than 4 months!

Good luck!

I had myself on the wait list but I guess he's a popular guy because I wasn't able to get in any sooner. Unfortunately, the appointment was not helpful and the doctor doesn't think I need a biopsy since my bloodwork was negative. He felt that I just need to take Metamucil every day and my problems will be solved. Since I'm not having any further testing done for celiac I'm going to do a gluten-free trial just to see what happens.

NorthernElf Enthusiast
NorthernElf
Posted

I'm in BC and when I had my "testing" about 5 years ago my doc totally messed up...and so did I. I thought I was going in for a biopsy, she thought I was going in to see if my GERD damage was bad (no biopsy/celiac check was included). :angry: My doc figured a negative blood test was good enough, despite years of stomach issues and a very severe viral illness that made most eating painful for me (typical celiac onset). My bad was cutting out gluten for the four months before the test...so anything obvious would have been missed anyway. I had actually figured it out & was cutting it back before the blood test anyway.

So, the gastro guy came to talk to me after the scope & I asked him if he saw signs of celiac and he just blinked at me - wasn't looking for it, no biopsy, etc.

At this point, there is no way on earth I would do a celiac challenge - I could hire myself out as a gluten detector ! I wouldn't get through the first day of a challenge. As far as I'm concerned, I have celiac disease - and even if I have gluten intolerance most people understand celiac disease better as a condition...and the results (for me) are the same anyway.

So, anyway, it took me 4 months to get the scope, such as it was !

Peace41 Rookie
Peace41
Posted

Mine is not the normal situation,

After not being able to get in straight away in one area to see the specialist I went into another area and got to see the Endo guy after I saw the Ent person. I had the scope and dilatation the next week and the results of the biopsie a week later and going in this week to have another dilatation. I wasn't even expecting gluten intolerrance, I was just relieved it wasn't worse, because I had just been through such an awful herbal supplement/medication enduced oesophagus injury. My situation is I have dysphagia and all sorts of problems that I can't eat properly etc....so they counted it as urgent. When I rang up Brisbane Australia and told them what I had to live with etc...they put me in straight a way. All time up in Brisbane from where I am now, took four weeks. But I had to wait since Christmas with my throat feeling like it was swollen and obstructed at the voice box. If I had to wait for the other doctor in the other area I still would be waiting now just to see him and in a worse situation than I am in now, and they even put me on their priority list. So I am grateful, I had somewhere else to go.

Peace 4 1

  • 2 weeks later...
Reba32 Rookie
Reba32
Posted

well, if they won't schedule you for a biopsy, and you don't want to argue with him, then go gluten free and see what happens. Even if it's not Celiac, but gluten intolerance, Metamucil isn't going to help you any. :blink:

However, without the actual diagnosis, you can't write off the food expense on your taxes. ;)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,685
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    tdouglas2901
    Newest Member
    tdouglas2901
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Rejoicephd · Posted

      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Inkie · Posted

      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      Inconclusive results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.