Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Special Staining To Diagnose Dermatitis Herpetiformis


sharonlee

Recommended Posts

sharonlee Newbie

Hello,

n 2004, my physician did a gluten panel to test for celiac disease. Apparently, it came back negative. However, due to obvious symptoms and reactions when I eat gluten - I opted to place myself on a gluten free and dairy free diet.

Since 2004, on six different occasions, I have experienced a rash. This past week, I again experienced the rash. The rash is not in the typical location for dermatitis herpetiformis, however, I have read that it can be anywhere. It has been consistently in the same places these six times - located on my trunk, neck, scalp, back and behind knees. It is very itchy, papular and then as it improves - gets sort of a hard scale or feel to it before fading. Usually lasts at least one week.

I decided to go to my physician and request a biopsy to determine if it is dermatitis herpetiformis. However, my physician did not order immunoflourescent staining. He called me with the results and said that the biopsy showed nummular contact dermatitis or allergic dermatitis. I questioned him as to whether the special staining had been done. His reply was, no, that "after initial assessment, they (the lab) determined that staining wasn't necessary".

Do you think that is an accurate response? I thought that DH could only be diagnosed with the staining. Is is true that they could look at the sample and make an assessment that staining wasn't necessary because it was obvious another problem?

My only intent on requesting the biopsy was to determine if it was DH with the special staining. I had no interest in knowing what the cause of the rash was - only if it was DH.

My reasoning is that if it is celiac - then I want to know. I am already gluten free but knowing it may help me to be more proactive in my care. I know that lymphoma risks etc are associated with celiac.

I do have vitamin D deficiency and was told this year that I have osteopenia. I have much gastrointestinal trouble when I consume gluten and also pitting of the enamel on my teeth. I used to itch all the time on the sides of my hips or buttocks - but since going gluten free dairy free - I no longer have that problem.

I do know that I had recently consumed a small amount of gluten - at a wedding party. I also had been using a lot of iodized salt on fresh cucumbers of late.

What do you think?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

I wonder if your doctor forgot to note on the biopsy that you were specifically looking for DH?

sharonlee Newbie

I wonder if your doctor forgot to note on the biopsy that you were specifically looking for DH?

Maybe - but that is the whole reason that I went in for the biopsy anyway. It just frustrates me.

climbmtwhitney Apprentice

Maybe - but that is the whole reason that I went in for the biopsy anyway. It just frustrates me.

Sharon,

The same thing happened to my 7 yr old son. The dermatologist said he'd take a 2nd biopsy with the stain if the 1st visual peek looked like DH was a possibility. Well, the first peek came back as "eczema". Someone here on the forum said that DH is a form of eczema, so it is supposed to visually resemble it. This happened last summer. We are still experiencing the awful rash on the back of his neck and elbows. It happens every few months. The last outbreak was in the beginning of September and is still healing. My son has been gluten-free for 2 years. We still think the rash is happening when he accidentally gets gluten. We did the full panel of skin prick testing and nothing else turned up. The 1st biopsy was hard for him so I'm reluctant to follow up (with a new doctor of course) with another one.

I would insist on a 2nd biopsy w/staining. From what I learned here the skin sample needs to be about 2 mm away from an actual lesion/bump. And, you are right, the only way to know for sure is to do the stain. Good luck with it!

Jillian

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    2. - Roses8721 posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      gluten-free Oatmeal

    3. - Roses8721 replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,473
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kelly Hannon
    Newest Member
    Kelly Hannon
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Certainly, it would b wise to have a gene test done if your physician is open to it as it would provide some more data to understand what's going on. But keep in mind that the genetic test for celiac disease cannot be used as to diagnose celiac disease, only to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population possess one or both of the primary genes known to be associated with the development of active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develop active celiac disease. So, the gene test is an effective "rule out" tool but not an effective diagnostic tool.
    • Roses8721
      Had Quaker gluten-free oatmeal last night and my stomach is a mess today. NO flu but def stomach stuff. Anyone else?
    • Roses8721
      So you would be good with the diagnosis and not worry to check genetics etc etc? Appreciate your words!
    • Scott Adams
      As recommended by @Flash1970, you may want to get this: https://www.amazon.com/Curist-Lidocaine-Maximum-Strength-Topical/dp/B09DN7GR14/
    • Scott Adams
      For those who will likely remain gluten-free for life anyway due to well-known symptoms they have when eating gluten, my general advice is to ignore any doctors who push to go through a gluten challenge to get a formal diagnosis--and this is especially true for those who have severe symptoms when they eat gluten. It can take months, or even years to recover from such a challenge, so why do this if you already know that gluten is the culprit and you won't be eating it anyway?  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS--but those in this group will usually have negative tests, or at best, elevated antibodies that don't reach the level of official positive. Unfortunately test results for celiac disease are not always definitive, and many errors can be made when doing an endoscopy for celiac disease, and they can happen in many ways, for example not collecting the samples in the right areas, not collecting enough samples, or not interpreting the results properly and giving a Marsh score.  Many biopsy results can also be borderline, where there may be certain damage that could be associated with celiac disease, but it just doesn't quite reach the level necessary to make a formal diagnosis. The same is true for blood test results. Over the last 10 years or so a new "Weak Positive" range has been created by many labs for antibody results, which can simply lead to confusion (some doctors apparently believe that this means the patient can decide if they want more testing or to go gluten-free). There is no "Weak Negative" category, for example. Many patients are not told to eat gluten daily, lots of it, for the 6-8 week period leading up to their blood test, nor asked whether or not they've been eating gluten. Some patients even report to their doctors that they've been gluten-free for weeks or months before their blood tests, yet their doctors incorrectly say nothing to them about how this can affect their test, and create false negative results. Many people are not routinely given a total IGA blood test when doing a blood screening, which can lead to false negative interpretations if the patient has low IGA. We've seen on this forum many times that some doctors who are not fully up on how interpret the blood test results can tell patients that the don't need to follow a gluten-free diet or get more testing because only 1 of the 2 or 3 tests done in their panel is positive (wrong!), and the other 1 or 2 tests are negative.  Dermatologists often don't know how to do a proper skin biopsy for dermatitis herpetiformis, and when they do it wrongly their patient will continue to suffer with terrible DH itching, and all the risks associated with celiac disease. For many, the DH rash is the only presentation of celiac disease. These patients may end up on strong prescriptions for life to control their itching which also may have many negative side effects, for example Dapsone. Unfortunately many people will continue to suffer needlessly and eat gluten due to these errors in performing or interpreting celiac disease tests, but luckily some will find out about non-celiac gluten sensitivity on their own and go gluten-free and recover from their symptoms. Consider yourself lucky if you've figured out that gluten is the source of your health issues, and you've gone gluten-free, because many people will never figure this out.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.