Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

My 6 Yo's Test Results


kittywitty

Recommended Posts

kittywitty Newbie

I'm trying to get a decent idea of what's going on and a list of questions to bring to the pediatric endocrinologist on monday. More than anything I want to know the most that I can about her results so I know what the doctor is talking about and really, just what's going on after many disappointing visits with other doctors.

My 6 year old is tiny. For years now we've been run round with doctors who brush off our concerns or tell us we're over-reacting. Well, our new doctor actually listened to us and ordered a bunch of tests. With a tsh of over 617 and a bone age scan of 3.5 years old, we were referred to an endo. The first endo she said was hysterical over her results and the second (the one we're going to) wants us in there ASAP and called back to get us in sooner. For a little back history, she had horrible allergies to tons of things as a baby-mostly dairy and had horrible reactions at the tiniest amount. We thought maybe dairy allergy still (manifesting differently than the bleeding hives and gratuitous vomiting as a baby) or Celiacs as she has almost every single Celiac's symptom. Stomach pain, no appetite, lots of body hair, below the scale height/weight, vomiting, constipation or diarrhea at any given moment, almost no immune system, etc. Her dad is type 1 diabetic and my mother has thyroid cancer. Both think they may have Celiacs. My 3 yo is starting to develop some of the same issues as my 6 yo.

The doc ran an Anti Gliaden Panel IgA & IgG (not Elisa or ttg) and this is the result:

IGG: over 100 (doctor considered this normal though positive is over 17)

IGA: 5 (Negative)

Here are the other abnormal results:

UA: Many crystals in her urine and leukocytes. We're on our second UA and second round of abx for this

Free T4: .4 L

TSH: 617.47 H

Creatinine: .5 L

GFR: 213 H (though irrelevant for her age group?)

RBC: 3.89 L

Hemoglobin: 12 (borderline low)

Hematocrit: 35 L

MCH: 31 (borderline high)

BA% .5 (borderline high)

Gran % 42.2 (borderline low)

Ly# (lymphocytes?) 3.5 H

So far we're going to request a ttg/Elisa test and biopsy for Celiac's. I read that anything over 3 times the positive number for IgG warrants furthur investigation and points to GI autoimmune issues so I feel this should be followed up on. Is this the right step to take? Would we need a ped. gastroenterologist to be referred to? Our pediatrician said going gluten free would be a good thing to do (she is a stage 4 colon cancer survivor herself) but she is hesitant to do further testing because of the invasiveness. I read Open Original Shared Linkthe other day and it makes sense. Because honestly, at the moment they're worried about thyroid cancer as her thyroid seems to be entirely shut down. Even Celiacs is the best case scenario.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



sb2178 Enthusiast

Get her tested for ferritin and b12 levels, as that anemia may be B12 deficiency w/ or w/o iron deficiency. I haven't heard of iodine malabsorption, but maybe ask about that as well...? Plenty of celiac do have issues with the +2 minerals like iron, calcium, magnesium, and zinc.

Did anyone test for total IgA? She might be IgA deficient, making the IgG result VERY VERY valid. At that level, it should be considered even if it is less strongly tied to a celiac diagnosis. Something there is wrong. Getting the rest of the celiac panel would also be wise, especially if the new doc would diagnose based on bloods and diet response. (On the other hand, there are sensible reasons for doing the biopsies too.)

At the end of the day, whatever else you are looking for, taking her gluten free may be a great idea. You don't need anyone's permission to do that. At least you'll see what happens in terms of clearing up some of those symptoms! Good luck.

kittywitty Newbie

Get her tested for ferritin and b12 levels, as that anemia may be B12 deficiency w/ or w/o iron deficiency. I haven't heard of iodine malabsorption, but maybe ask about that as well...? Plenty of celiac do have issues with the +2 minerals like iron, calcium, magnesium, and zinc.

Did anyone test for total IgA? She might be IgA deficient, making the IgG result VERY VERY valid. At that level, it should be considered even if it is less strongly tied to a celiac diagnosis. Something there is wrong. Getting the rest of the celiac panel would also be wise, especially if the new doc would diagnose based on bloods and diet response. (On the other hand, there are sensible reasons for doing the biopsies too.)

At the end of the day, whatever else you are looking for, taking her gluten free may be a great idea. You don't need anyone's permission to do that. At least you'll see what happens in terms of clearing up some of those symptoms! Good luck.

Her ferritin level was normal, but they did not test B12. I'll put that on my list to ask for. The test does not look to be ttg-just generic Anti-gliaden it said. I'm more worried about going gluten free and then later tests being altered by it. She had skin prick test done at age 1.5 and it was all normal, though the allergist said it must've been false negative as she obviously was reacting. Her dairy allergy was pretty severe. So at least we're used to restricted diets! lol

Does the total IgA go by a specific name? All I know is it just said the IgA was 5 and 11-17 is equivocal and 17+ is positive. I have heard about IgA deficiency but do not know what level it would have to be for that to be taken into consideration. I saw something that indicated high basophils indicates allergic response, so that would make sense. But the doc said since her iron and ferritin levels were normal she is not anemic, even though her RBC, hemoglobin, and hematocrit were low. I am so confused!

mushroom Proficient

The IGA is called total serum IGA, and as I recall the normal range is something like 64-360 (just plucking those numbers from very old brain cells!), so anything in the 50's range for this test would be considered low and she would be considered not a normal maker of IGA antibodies, which would invalidate all IGA testing. Which celiac testing did they do? Can you provide us with the total tests, results and ranges?

ddennis11 Newbie

The IGA is called total serum IGA, and as I recall the normal range is something like 64-360 (just plucking those numbers from very old brain cells!), so anything in the 50's range for this test would be considered low and she would be considered not a normal maker of IGA antibodies, which would invalidate all IGA testing. Which celiac testing did they do? Can you provide us with the total tests, results and ranges?

Was wondering about the response regarding serum IGA and antibodies. My 12 year old serum IGA (or immunglobin IGA (same thing right?) was 30, tested negative on panel but her gladin anti-bodies 60 which was high. Her Absolute Eosinophils were almost 2000 just fyi. My impression from what I have read is that the low immunglobin IGA can make the panels falsely negative. That is what you are saying right? But it would not effect the anti-bodies test. Just out of curiosity does the very high absolute esinophils have any meaning?

kittywitty Newbie

The IGA is called total serum IGA, and as I recall the normal range is something like 64-360 (just plucking those numbers from very old brain cells!), so anything in the 50's range for this test would be considered low and she would be considered not a normal maker of IGA antibodies, which would invalidate all IGA testing. Which celiac testing did they do? Can you provide us with the total tests, results and ranges?

All it said on the print out (I got a copy from the hospital before we go to the endocrinologist) besides patient info like birthday:

Anti gliaden panel IGA & IGG

Gliadin Antibody (IGG) >100 (Flag)H

reference range:

<11 U/mL negative

11-17 equivocal

>17 positive

Gliadin Antibody (IGA) 5

reference range is the same as IGG

Test performed at Quest Diagnostics/Chantilly

Marlie Apprentice

Was wondering about the response regarding serum IGA and antibodies. My 12 year old serum IGA (or immunglobin IGA (same thing right?) was 30, tested negative on panel but her gladin anti-bodies 60 which was high. Her Absolute Eosinophils were almost 2000 just fyi. My impression from what I have read is that the low immunglobin IGA can make the panels falsely negative. That is what you are saying right? But it would not effect the anti-bodies test. Just out of curiosity does the very high absolute esinophils have any meaning?

Eosinophils : The Mayo Clinic has a good explanation of Eosinophils. It can mean many things like allergic reaction, parasites, autoimmune diseases and some other conditions.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,078
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Deb baker
    Newest Member
    Deb baker
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Colleen H
      Thank you so much for your response  Yes it seems as though things get very painful as time goes on.  I'm not eating gluten as far as I know.  However, I'm not sure of cross contamination.  My system seems to weaken to hidden spices and other possibilities. ???  if cross contamination is possible...I am in a super sensitive mode of celiac disease.. Neuropathy from head to toes
    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
    • Russ H
      This treatment looks promising. Its aim is to provoke immune tolerance of gluten, possibly curing the disease. It passed the phase 2 trial with flying colours, and I came across a post on Reddit by one of the study volunteers. Apparently, the results were good enough that the company is applying for fast track approval.  Anokion Announces Positive Symptom Data from its Phase 2 Trial Evaluating KAN-101 for the Treatment of Celiac Disease https://www.reddit.com/r/Celiac/comments/1krx2wh/kan_101_trial_put_on_hold/
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.