Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Having A Hard Time Understanding Son's Celiac Blood Test Results


jlmccord

Recommended Posts

jlmccord Newbie

My daughter (6 y/o) was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes back in December 2010 and had a positive celiac's screening a couple weeks ago. We have an appt with a pediatric GI specialist next Monday, so I went ahead and got my 2 sons screened as well. So far I have got back my 3 y/o's results but I am having a hard time understanding what I am looking for. I've tried to do research online but I am finding conflicting info. Any help would be greatly appreciated!!! Thanks!!!

Celiac Disease Antibody Panel

Gliadin Antibody, IgG >100 U/ml H Reference Range: <11 U/mL

Gliadin Antibody, IgA <3 U/mL Reference Range: <11 U/mL

Tissue Transglutamine IgA Ab PENDING

Reticulin IgA Screen Negative Reference Range: Negative

Additional Testing Not Indicated


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



LindseyK23 Newbie

I would like to try to help you - but let me preface that by saying that I am no expert and am very new to this as well. But in obsessively reading everything on the internet to try to understand my 5 year old's recent blood test results, I will give you my input.

The Gliadin Antibodies are most likely the Deamidated anti-gliadin ones, as I dont think many are testing the other kind any more. This (I think) checks to see if the body has developed antibodies to the protein in gluten, and I have read numbers like less than 20 is normal (the reference ranges they provided say less that 11 is normal, maybe because he is so young). So, it looks like his anti-gliadin IgG is indeed very high but IgA is normal. They may have tested his overall IgA too, as he could just have a general IgA deficiency (which would make that test inaccurate - I have read that something like 2% of celiac patients have that IgA deficiency.

The Tissue Transglutaminase (ttg) anitbodies are important, and his are not back yet. The numbers I read on line suggest that for tTg, an IgA equal to or above 4 is concerning, with over 10 being fully positive, and an IgG of 6 or more is concerning, with 9 and above being considered positive. This (I think) is the test to see if the body is forming antibodies against itself.

The other important test is the Antiendomysial antibody (EMA), which I didn't see you list, but I forget whether it is valid for very young children.

So, it looks like he has one concerning test result (so far). I would see what the tTg is and talk to the specialist when you are there. Hope this was even a little helpful.

pgrovetom Rookie

My daughter (6 y/o) was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes back in December 2010 and had a positive celiac's screening a couple weeks ago. We have an appt with a pediatric GI specialist next Monday, so I went ahead and got my 2 sons screened as well. So far I have got back my 3 y/o's results but I am having a hard time understanding what I am looking for. I've tried to do research online but I am finding conflicting info. Any help would be greatly appreciated!!! Thanks!!!

Celiac Disease Antibody Panel

Gliadin Antibody, IgG >100 U/ml H Reference Range: <11 U/mL

Gliadin Antibody, IgA <3 U/mL Reference Range: <11 U/mL

Tissue Transglutamine IgA Ab PENDING

Reticulin IgA Screen Negative Reference Range: Negative

Additional Testing Not Indicated

Doctors have a bad habit of cutting corners on blood tests as they cost money. This Mayo Clinic Celiac testing algorithm

Open Original Shared Link

is the best and most readable testing strategy I have found.

Was the Gliadin Gliadin Antibody, IgG >100 U/ml H Reference Range: <11 U/mL antibody test the Deamidated test? The older test is no longer recommended and the Deamidated Gliadin Abs or DGA test is better. This test looks VERY positive!

According to the Mayo algorithm, if any of the antibody tests are positive, it indicates a biopsy. If the biopsy is positive, its Celiac but if negative, then the DQ2 and DQ8 test must be done in hope of resolving the mixed results. If those come back positive than its probably Celiac and the biopsy missed the damaged area but if negative than its probably not Celiac.

Notice I always say probably without a positive biopsy? That is because ruling something out when there are mixed test results is a sure fire way to end up with a bad or missed diagnosis.

The Acid test is a rigorous Gluten Free diet. If the symptoms resolve its probably either Gluten sensitivity or Celiac. If you then do a challenge and eat lots of wheat like Mini-Wheats and get really ill, then stop and feel good again, you are now at 99.99% sure its Celiac or Gluten sensitivity. Gluten sensitivity can cause problems even if it doesn't evolve into Celiac. That is another reason the biopsy isn't bulletproof. If the DGM antibody test is positive, then I'd be very suspicious.

Skylark Collaborator

Celiac Disease Antibody Panel

Gliadin Antibody, IgG >100 U/ml H Reference Range: <11 U/mL

Gliadin Antibody, IgA <3 U/mL Reference Range: <11 U/mL

Tissue Transglutamine IgA Ab PENDING

Reticulin IgA Screen Negative Reference Range: Negative

Additional Testing Not Indicated

If that's deamidated gliadin, he needs to be gluten-free. That is an antibody to a form of gluten that is ONLY formed in the intestine of someone who either has celiac disease or is well on the way. He should be biopsied but even if the biopsy is negative, that antibody is a sign of trouble to come.

If it's the old anti-gliadin, the IgG would only be a problem if he is IgA deficient and I don't see total IgA in the panel.

Reticulin is the old name for anti-endomysial, which you should be able to look up pretty easily. Negative is good, but the test is less sensitive than deamidated gliadin where he came up positive.

Skylark Collaborator

Open Original Shared Link

is the best and most readable testing strategy I have found.

Readable, perhaps. Best? Not by a country mile. That exact strategy has nearly gotten folks on the board killed because it is overly conservative, has incorrect false negative rates, and relies too heavily on our very incomplete understanding of celiac genetics. Not to mention it completely glosses over the fact that gluten intolerance and celiac disease are a spectrum and that you can be "sort of" celiac and very sick.

Roda Rising Star

Reticulin is the old name for anti-endomysial, which you should be able to look up pretty easily.

I didn't know this. My oldest son(10.5 yrs old) had this done when he was eight and I think it was negative, but he has been consistintly negative three times now. Even so we have an appointment with a pedi GI next week and I am going to push for biopsy. I've felt for quite awhile that he needs to be gluten free as does his allergist. His allergist feels that he is either a sero negative celiac or gluten intolerent given some of his symptoms and his younger brother and I both having celiac. So we will see how the appointment goes next week.

To the original poster, he seems to be positive on that one test. If you want to continue testing, scope/biopsy, then keep him on a full gluten diet until you are done with testing. I would go gluten free right after biopsy or if you choose not to do it, trial him gluten free for a good three months. At that point you could choose to do a challenge. That is what I did with my youngest son. He had a positive Iga TTg and since it is pretty specific to celiac and my celiac diagnosis (positive blood/biopsy), we chose not to do the scope. After gluten free 4.5 months we did do a gluten challenge. Suffice to say it only lasted three whole days and he his gluten free for good!!

jlmccord Newbie

Thanks SO much for all of your helpful info!!! I pretty much had came to the conclusion myself that if anything he definitely is gluten intolerant. His iGa numbers seemed so low, so I was maybe thinking that he was iGa deficient?? When I see the Ped GI specialist for my daughter on Monday morning, I'm gonna push for biopsies on both of them. Hopefully I'll be able to get my other son's test results back tomorrow so I can present it all to him at the same time... Pediatric GI specialists are so hard to get in to see here, so I want to get it all done at one time if possible. PLUS if we're gonna make the switch, I want to get all tests/biopsies done asap. Once again, thanks so much!!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Roda Rising Star

Thanks SO much for all of your helpful info!!! I pretty much had came to the conclusion myself that if anything he definitely is gluten intolerant. His iGa numbers seemed so low, so I was maybe thinking that he was iGa deficient?? When I see the Ped GI specialist for my daughter on Monday morning, I'm gonna push for biopsies on both of them. Hopefully I'll be able to get my other son's test results back tomorrow so I can present it all to him at the same time... Pediatric GI specialists are so hard to get in to see here, so I want to get it all done at one time if possible. PLUS if we're gonna make the switch, I want to get all tests/biopsies done asap. Once again, thanks so much!!

Make sure you ask how many biopsy samples the doctor is going to take. The recommendation used to be a minumum of 6-8 but there are some posts on here that say that now they are recommending 8-11 samples.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,201
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Judy Wysocki
    Newest Member
    Judy Wysocki
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.