Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Return To Normal = Celiac?


Thea-Bug

Recommended Posts

Thea-Bug Newbie

Hi all,

Long time lurker, first post here :) I'm confused about my results & haven't heard back from my GI, who's usually slow about getting back - I just have a copy of the lab results in the mail. My TTG IGA was very high several months ago. I then went gluten-free. I didn't do the biopsy because I was undergoing another surgery at the time and decided not to (I realize the time has passed now that I'm gluten-free). I have been gluten-free now for a while. I had a repeat blood test last week and the TTG IGA is now completely normal (under 1 in fact!).

At my follow up, before the GI drew the blood, she said that my positive response to the gluten free diet, plus the TTG IGA, may indicate celiac. She said that the follow up blood test would confirm celiac for sure.

My question is this: does this make sense that the follow up blood test would confirm? I get that the false negative rate for the TTG IGA is very low, and is only for a few other conditions like autoimmune stuff and liver failure. So does the fact that it went down to practically zero over the course of several months mean for sure that it's celiac? That would make sense to me, because if it was something else in the first place (e.g. liver failure), a gluten-free diet shouldn't affect that number. But of course, then there's the fact that the biopsy is supposed to be the gold standard. So I guess that's where I'm confused. Isn't TTG IGA a measurement of ACTUAL REPAIR GOING ON TO THE INTESTINES in the first place? Right? Isn't that the body's immune response to damage in the intestines? Or do I have that wrong?

So confused right now! ;)

Thanks in advance!

Thea


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



pain*in*my*gut Apprentice

Hi all,

Long time lurker, first post here :) I'm confused about my results & haven't heard back from my GI, who's usually slow about getting back - I just have a copy of the lab results in the mail. My TTG IGA was very high several months ago. I then went gluten-free. I didn't do the biopsy because I was undergoing another surgery at the time and decided not to (I realize the time has passed now that I'm gluten-free). I have been gluten-free now for a while. I had a repeat blood test last week and the TTG IGA is now completely normal (under 1 in fact!).

At my follow up, before the GI drew the blood, she said that my positive response to the gluten free diet, plus the TTG IGA, may indicate celiac. She said that the follow up blood test would confirm celiac for sure.

My question is this: does this make sense that the follow up blood test would confirm? I get that the false negative rate for the TTG IGA is very low, and is only for a few other conditions like autoimmune stuff and liver failure. So does the fact that it went down to practically zero over the course of several months mean for sure that it's celiac? That would make sense to me, because if it was something else in the first place (e.g. liver failure), a gluten-free diet shouldn't affect that number. But of course, then there's the fact that the biopsy is supposed to be the gold standard. So I guess that's where I'm confused. Isn't TTG IGA a measurement of ACTUAL REPAIR GOING ON TO THE INTESTINES in the first place? Right? Isn't that the body's immune response to damage in the intestines? Or do I have that wrong?

So confused right now! ;)

Thanks in advance!

Thea

The tTG test is the antibody that indicates that your body is making toxic molecules from gluten that damage your villi. It is a measure of the how badly your body is DAMAGING your intestines. So, the fact that it has returned to normal after a gluten free diet is a pretty good indicator that you have Celiac. If it was elevated because of another issue (Crohn's disease, liver disease, etc.) then it would not have gone down.

I would say you don't need a biopsy for a dx. I think the blood work and your response to gluten-free diet are good enough. If it's really important to you to have positive biopsy results, then you will have to go on a gluten challenge for 3 months and torture yourself for a confirmation , but even then the "Gold Standard" biopsy can be falsly negative.

My 2 cents.....in lieu of a biopsy, why not see if the GI doc can order genetic tests to see if you have the genes for Celiac? If you are negative for the genes, it is impossible for you to have it. But if you are positive for the genes, then it's one more piece to the puzzle and the "nail in the coffin", given all the other evidence.

Welcome to the group! Sorry you are here, but glad you are here! :D

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Yes if your blood test was positive and you got relief on the diet and then after that those numbers went down to normal levels you are one of us.

Personally I wouldn't use gene testing as a for sure one way or the other that you are celiac. There is much that we don't know yet about genes and there are many more celiac associated genes than are usually tested for.

Consider yourself diagnosed and keep up the good work with the diet.

Thea-Bug Newbie

Thanks guys!

I also forgot to ask earlier: could my situation just be gluten sensitivity (I realize the distinction doesn't really matter but I just want to know)? I've read conflicting things on this board - some say TTG IGA only shows up with celiac (if it's showing up related to gluten issues - that is, excluding the other reasons a TTG IGA test could be positive), and others say TTG IGA shows up with celiac AND gluten sensitivity.... ???

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Thanks guys!

I also forgot to ask earlier: could my situation just be gluten sensitivity (I realize the distinction doesn't really matter but I just want to know)? I've read conflicting things on this board - some say TTG IGA only shows up with celiac (if it's showing up related to gluten issues - that is, excluding the other reasons a TTG IGA test could be positive), and others say TTG IGA shows up with celiac AND gluten sensitivity.... ???

Whether it is celiac or "just" gluten sensitivity really doesn't matter. Just as much damage is done with each and the need to be strictly gluten free is the same no matter what label you put on it. It is a misconception IMHO that gluten sensitivity is less serious.

Thea-Bug Newbie

Yes--just curious if TTG returning to normal was ONLY a sign of celiac, because even though I realize that gluten sensitivity and celiac really aren't different in terms of the treatment, I wonder with how to approach getting my kids tested.

Does anyone know if levels returning to normal always means celiac (as opposed to gluten sensitivity)? I've heard conflicting things.

THanks!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - AlwaysLearning replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Gluten related ??

    2. - Colleen H replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Gluten related ??

    3. - Jmartes71 replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    4. - AlwaysLearning replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    5. - AlwaysLearning replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Gluten related ??


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,082
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    MelanieR
    Newest Member
    MelanieR
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • AlwaysLearning
      Get tested for vitamin deficiencies.  Though neuropathy can be a symptom of celiac, it can also be caused by deficiencies due to poor digestion caused by celiac and could be easier to treat.
    • Colleen H
      Thank you so much for your response  Yes it seems as though things get very painful as time goes on.  I'm not eating gluten as far as I know.  However, I'm not sure of cross contamination.  My system seems to weaken to hidden spices and other possibilities. ???  if cross contamination is possible...I am in a super sensitive mode of celiac disease.. Neuropathy from head to toes
    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.