Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Can Someone Please Help Me Interpret These Results?


BellaBella

Recommended Posts

BellaBella Rookie

Hi All.

I am 35 and have had IBS symptoms (and others) for 20 years, at least. After doing a lot of reading about Celiac and going gluten-free I asked my doctor to do a blood test.

I went in two days ago for my follow-up, as soon as she entered the room she said "you have Celiac." She was that definitive. I asked her if I should have a biopsy and she said "that would only confirm what we already know." She said that even some known celiacs won't test positive on a blood test so the fact that I did was pretty definitive that I have it. So, we talked about what I needed to do and off I went - not at all surprised by the diagnosis.

But now that I'm looking over the test results I am very confused. Due to the results and the research I've been doing obsessively over the last few days I'm beginning to doubt the diagnosis just by looking at the numbers - not by symptoms, obviously.

Here are my results:

-Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum result: 417 HIGH reference interval: 70-400

-Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgA result: 8 reference interval: 0-19

-t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA result: <2 reference interval: 0-3

negative 0-3

weak positive 4-10

positive >10

-Endomysial Antibody IgA result: negative reference interval: negative

I was diagnosed earlier this year with Hashimoto's Thyroiditis, I had low levels of those antibodies in my blood. This time around I also have high liver enzymes, not sure if that has any bearing at all on the celiac diagnosis.

If I'm reading those numbers correctly the total IgA is the only item of concern, and from what I've read that can be due to just about anything. Am I missing something?

I have started a gluten-free diet but I'm wondering if I should start eating gluten again and request a biopsy. Or does it really matter? I guess I would feel better knowing "for sure" that I have celiac vs. just being gluten intolerant.

Can anyone shed any light on these results? Thanks in advance.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Skylark Collaborator

Looks like a negative celiac panel to me. Weird. Yes, you should start eating gluten again and request a biopsy if you want a definitive diagnosis.

Yes, we sometimes have liver enzyme elevations. Hashi's is common among celiacs too.

Takala Enthusiast

after...... going gluten free I asked my doctor to do a blood test.

Stay off of gluten long enough, and the blood test comes out negative.... no surprise. Even comes out negative sometimes on gluten, with symptoms that are obvious. You would have to eat it seriously for months, for the re- tests, and for what purpose, again ? You already have celiac associated disease(s), liver do problems go with this, I'm assuming that you also had celiac symptoms the doctor is going on, such as the "IBS."

Celiac or gluten intolerant, same treatment: gluten free diet. B)

Looking for answers Contributor

I had the same exact thing happen to me. I got a firm diagnosis, then I later looked at my bloodwork and started scratching my head. Luckily I have a friend who is a doctor and I had him look at the results, and he confirmed that based on the results, I shouldn't have received the diagnosis. I was so frustrated because I had alread stopped eating gluten by the time I discovered the error, and never want to go back eating it. I'll never have a clear diagnosis now.

beachbirdie Contributor

Elevated liver enzymes can be related to thyroid issues. And, as another poster stated, Hashimoto's thyroiditis and celiac are common companions.

The Horticulturalist Apprentice

I can't see a +ve test there except the first one, and that's not indicative of celiac as far as I am aware. Your EMA and Ttg were both negative. I think your doctor has got mixed up somewhere, not a gastroenterologist I hope?

As others have said if you want a definitive diagnosis then you need to be eating gluten for 12 weeks prior to testing for your blood work and endoscopy. Even if you had +ve blood work, many doctors will not give you a diagnosis based on that alone. My son had +ve Ttg and EMA, the +ve EMA means it's pretty much 100% sure that he had it, but no one I talked to would give him a diagnosis with the blood tests alone so we has the endoscopy which did confirm it. It you want to know for sure I would seek out an experienced GI doctor to do an endoscopy, if you don't care either way then you could simply go ahead and try the diet and see if you feel better.

Were you eating gluten when you had these bloods taken?

You have hashimotos, along with your IBS issues that's a red flag for celiac, I'd get the endoscopy with or without +ve bloods.

BellaBella Rookie

Hi everyone, thanks for your responses. I just wanted to make sure I wasn't mis-interpreting something. I was eating gluten when I had the blood draw. I have tried the gluten-free diet before in the past but never made it more than a week. It's been about 2 months since I last tried, I'm not sure if that could have skewed the blood test results.

The sum of all my issues (elevated liver enzymes, Hashimotos, IBS, etc) sure makes me suspect celiac but I'd like to know for sure one way or the other. Maybe she made the diagnosis based on all my symptoms. I intend to start a gluten-free diet regardless but I think it will be helpful for me if I know for sure whether I'm intolerant or true celiac.

Because of the "definitive" diagnosis she gave me I plan to call on Monday and ask her to explain that going step-by-step thru the individual test results. Then I plan to ask for a referral for an endoscopy. The doctor that made the diagnosis is not GI, but there is a GI in town that I have seen before in the past for IBS. I hope they can get me in soon for insurance purposes and also because I'm anxious and motivated to see if I feel any better on gluten-free.

Thanks again for your responses and if anyone has anything to add I'd still welcome opinions!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,207
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    WAB19
    Newest Member
    WAB19
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.