Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood Test Results Vs Small Intestine Biopsy


GladGirl

Recommended Posts

GladGirl Rookie

I realize that having been diagnosed by a Hematologist who ran all the blood tests for Celiac Disease on me is not considered the "gold standard". However, after having been through surgery to remove my gallbladder and a very painful biopsy on my liver, I really didn't feel the need to go through yet another "invasive" procedure. Some have questioned me about my ttg level and all I can say is it was my IGA positive results that the Dr. has used for my diagnosis. Here is a short synopsis from our very own library on this site, to explain that type of usage:

"IgA anti-gliadin antibodies are less sensitive but are more specific. In clinical trials, the IgA antibodies have a specificity of 97% but the sensitivity is only 71%. That means that, if a patient is IgA positive, there is a 97% probability that they have celiac disease. Conversely, if the patient is IgA negative, there is only a 71% probability that the patient is truly negative for celiac disease. Therefore, a positive result is a strong indication that the patient has the disease but a negative result does not necessarily mean that they don not have it. False positive results are rather uncommon but false negative results can occur."

This excerpt is from "Interpretation of Celiac Disease Blood Test Results" by Scott Adams located on this site for Diagnosis information.

At this point in my life, almost 60 years of age, I really do not feel the need to digest "gluten" again just to please the medical community or others. With the wonderful results of my newest blood work since being gluten free for 3 months now....I do not want to reverse this process of feeling so much better.

I have been in contact with a support group close to my area and hope my search for a "celiac wise" Dr. in family practice or internal medicine close by can be found. So far, one of the mediators for the group said the Gastroenterologists they have had "cut them lose" to fend for themselves since diet is the treatment. Really?? What a need in the medical community then, even to Pediatricians, OB/GYN, and Dentists! From the short amount of research I have been doing, we need to be monitored at any rate about our nutrient sufficiency and proper treatment when prescribing any medications. That certainly leaves a huge gap since our population is so infected. Try telling your current Dr. he is wrong to prescribe you a medicine!! Mine yelled at me!! Not willing to take that again!

Sending you all well wishes to our healing process! :)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,351
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    giuseppe gamerra
    Newest Member
    giuseppe gamerra
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • par18
      Thanks for the reply. 
    • Scott Adams
      What you’re describing is actually very common, and unfortunately the timing of the biopsy likely explains the confusion. Yes, it is absolutely possible for the small intestine to heal enough in three months on a strict gluten-free diet to produce a normal or near-normal biopsy, especially when damage was mild to begin with. In contrast, celiac antibodies can stay elevated for many months or even years after gluten removal, so persistently high antibody levels alongside the celiac genes and clear nutrient deficiencies strongly point to celiac disease, even if you don’t feel symptoms. Many people with celiac are asymptomatic but still develop iron and vitamin deficiencies and silent intestinal damage. The lack of immediate symptoms makes it harder emotionally, but it doesn’t mean gluten isn’t harming you. Most specialists would consider this a case of celiac disease with a false-negative biopsy due to early healing rather than “something else,” and staying consistently gluten-free is what protects you long-term—even when your body doesn’t protest right away.
    • Scott Adams
      Yes, I meant if you had celiac disease but went gluten-free before screening, your results would end up false-negative. As @trents mentioned, this can also happen when a total IGA test isn't done.
    • Seaperky
      I found at Disney springs and Disney they have specialist that when told about dietary restrictions they come and talk to you ,explain cross contamination measures tsken and work with you on choices. Its the one place I dont worry once I've explained I have celiac disease.  Thier gluten free options are awesome.
    • Churley
      Have you tried Pure Encapsulations supplements? This is a brand my doctor recommends for me. I have no issues with this brand.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.