Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Should I Have An Endoscopy?


mamato4

Recommended Posts

mamato4 Rookie

Hi All,

I am new here, so I am just starting out on learning about Celiac. I was given a positive blood test result over the phone from my Dr yesterday. I am waiting on a referral to a gastroenterologist. Here's my question: Can you help me think through the pros and cons of going through with the biopsy? Part of me thinks that a lifetime of symptoms that fit the dx is good enough. I temporarily took myself off gluten recently and felt AMAZING for the first time EVER (I'm 32). I went back on it and had shockingly severe symptoms within an hour and for almost a week. I'm off again and am starting to feel normal. The other part of me thinks that I should find out the extent of my intestinal damage (and IF I have any), so that I'm not tempted to cheat when the gluten-free diet gets hard to stick to.

Any advice? I'm torn. I don't want to go back on gluten for the test, but I really do want to know. I should add: I have 4 kids who I'd like to have tested. Blood work will be happening soon. My 8yo has had chronic diarrhea since birth and has an ADHD diagnosis, though I've always suspected food as a correlation.

TIA for you help.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



beachbirdie Contributor

Hi All,

I am new here, so I am just starting out on learning about Celiac. I was given a positive blood test result over the phone from my Dr yesterday. I am waiting on a referral to a gastroenterologist. Here's my question: Can you help me think through the pros and cons of going through with the biopsy? Part of me thinks that a lifetime of symptoms that fit the dx is good enough. I temporarily took myself off gluten recently and felt AMAZING for the first time EVER (I'm 32). I went back on it and had shockingly severe symptoms within an hour and for almost a week. I'm off again and am starting to feel normal. The other part of me thinks that I should find out the extent of my intestinal damage (and IF I have any), so that I'm not tempted to cheat when the gluten-free diet gets hard to stick to.

Any advice? I'm torn. I don't want to go back on gluten for the test, but I really do want to know. I should add: I have 4 kids who I'd like to have tested. Blood work will be happening soon. My 8yo has had chronic diarrhea since birth and has an ADHD diagnosis, though I've always suspected food as a correlation.

TIA for you help.

HI and welcome to the forum.

You are going to receive answers from all over the spectrum on the question of scoping vs. not scoping. You'll have to be the final judge.

If you really need a firmer diagnosis to make you stay on the diet, maybe scoping is worth it. If you need a diagnosis for some kinds of tax advantages or for disability services, it might be worth it.

On the other hand, sometimes celiac damage is missed in the biopsy and then docs will say you don't have celiac even if you do. Damage can be patchy, and a lot depends on the skill of the person taking the biopsy, as well as the pathologist who reads/interprets the slides.

If you are off gluten for any length of time, you are going to skew the results. Your intestines will start healing and you WILL get a negative biopsy. You must be glutening for the scope to give accurate results.

I think the dramatic response to dietary change is a huge factor, and you could consider that answer enough.

Do you happen to have a copy of your test results? Do you know which blood tests they did?

veronika Newbie

If your doctor will diagnose you with Celiac's based on the positive bloodwork then there is no huge reason to get the scope done IMO. The only reason you would do it at that point is if you want to see the extent of the damage, or to be super positive that the diagnosis is correct (although I hear the rate of false positive is really really low).

If your doctor will not diagnose you just based on the blood work (which would be strange, but does happen), or if they are worried about the extent of damage, I would have the scope -- no question. There is a tax credit for the cost of gluten-free products in Canada too, which is nice, but you will need a diagnosis in order to claim it. Hopefully if you decide you have the scope done it doesn't take too long to get you in, so you don't have to be on gluten for months. The scope is covered under provincial health care, in most cases, so there is no worry about the cost and the actual procedure is pretty easy to deal with.

veronika Newbie

So I re-read my post and I sound retarded... thought you were Canadian, sorry about that. I'm going to blame the brain fog on this one :blink: .

mamato4 Rookie

Thank you for responding! I requested all my lab work to be mailed...I got copies in the mail today of all the tests she ran EXCEPT the Celiac panel. Arg. Anyway, I asked her twice to tell me what it said. All I know is that there were 6 antibodies tested and the only one that was positive read tTg- iGg. She said it was an 8 and was on the high end of weakly positive. Does that help? As soon as I actually get the correct printout I'll post it.

beachbirdie Contributor

Thank you for responding! I requested all my lab work to be mailed...I got copies in the mail today of all the tests she ran EXCEPT the Celiac panel. Arg. Anyway, I asked her twice to tell me what it said. All I know is that there were 6 antibodies tested and the only one that was positive read tTg- iGg. She said it was an 8 and was on the high end of weakly positive. Does that help? As soon as I actually get the correct printout I'll post it.

I see now why the scope might be recommended. The TtG IgG can be elevated from some things besides celiac, and the scope should show damage to the intestine. Some docs won't diagnose if that is the only elevated antibody. That said, there are several here who only had positive TtG IgG, and yet their scope showed a LOT of damage.

That antibody is a definite sign that you have autoimmunity going on, it is an antibody in which the body is attacking itself.

mamato4 Rookie

Thank you. Here are my full results. Vit D and TSH were normal.

WBC 3.9 Range 4.0-10.5

Deamidated Gliadin , IgA 2 Range 0-19

Deamidated Gliadin IgG 3 Range 0-19

Endomysial Antibody IgA Negative

Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum 118 Range 70-400

tTG, IgA <2 Range 0-3

tTG, IgG 8 Range 0-5


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to Silk tha Shocker's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Help

    2. - Silk tha Shocker posted a topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Help

    3. - trents replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    4. - Roses8721 posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      gluten-free Oatmeal

    5. - Roses8721 replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,476
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    bwhntr1953
    Newest Member
    bwhntr1953
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I don't think any apps are up to date, which is exactly why this happened to you. Most of the data in such apps is years old, and it doesn't get updated in real time. Ultimately there is no substitution for learning to read labels. The following two lists are very helpful for anyone who is gluten sensitive and needs to avoid gluten when shopping. It's very important to learn to read labels and understand sources of hidden gluten, and to know some general information about product labelling--for example in the USA if wheat is a possible allergen it must be declared on a product's ingredient label like this: Allergens: Wheat.      
    • Silk tha Shocker
      What is the best gluten free scanner app? I have the "gluten-free Scanner" app. I scanned an almond joy and it says it contains gluten when the package is labeled gluten free
    • trents
      Certainly, it would b wise to have a gene test done if your physician is open to it as it would provide some more data to understand what's going on. But keep in mind that the genetic test for celiac disease cannot be used as to diagnose celiac disease, only to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population possess one or both of the primary genes known to be associated with the development of active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develop active celiac disease. So, the gene test is an effective "rule out" tool but not an effective diagnostic tool.
    • Roses8721
      Had Quaker gluten-free oatmeal last night and my stomach is a mess today. NO flu but def stomach stuff. Anyone else?
    • Roses8721
      So you would be good with the diagnosis and not worry to check genetics etc etc? Appreciate your words!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.