- Home
- Celiac Disease Diagnosis, Testing & Treatment (Gluten-Free Diet)
- How Early Can Celiac Disease Be Diagnosed?
How Early Can Celiac Disease Be Diagnosed?
- By Dr. Rodney Ford M.D.
- Published 01/8/2008
- Celiac Disease Diagnosis, Testing & Treatment (Gluten-Free Diet)
-
Rating:




Dr. Rodney Ford M.D.
Dr. Rodney Ford is a Pediatric Gastroenterologist. He was Professor of Pediatrics at the Christchurch School of Medicine. He runs the Children’s Gastroenterology and Allergy Clinic in New Zealand. He has written a series of 7 books on gluten (www.DrRodneyFord.com). His main theory is that symptoms from gluten reactions arise from brain and nerve damage. His latest book is "The Gluten Syndrome" which encapsulates current ideas and concepts of gluten and the harm that it does.
View all articles by Dr. Rodney Ford M.D.How Early Can Celiac Disease Be Diagnosed?
This question, “how early can you diagnose celiac disease?” is a major concern for both parents and paediatricians. This is because, like many diseases, celiac disease comes on slowly. This means that it can take a long time to make the diagnosis.
Celiac disease can develop slowly?
Yes, celiac disease can develop very slowly. The symptoms can be subtle. It is a progressive disease. When you are first born, you cannot have celiac disease as you have never been exposed to gluten. However, if you have the right genetic make up (that is you have the celiac gene) and the right environmental circumstances (eating gluten and getting gut inflammation), then celiac disease can develop.
Finding tissue damage
Celiac disease is a condition that is recognised when you get damage to your small bowel tissue. This damage is triggered by gluten.
The standard way to detect this tissue damage is by taking a gut biopsy of the small bowel skin (also called the mucosa). This is done by the technique of upper endoscopy whilst under an anaesthetic. Tiny fragments of gut tissue are snipped off with a pair of forceps. This tissue is then sent to a pathology lab. The lab people (histologists) look down their microscopes at this tissue sample. They are looking for the gut damage called villous atrophy which is characteristic of disease.
Early antibody changes – IgG-gliadin
Importantly, long before the tissue becomes obviously damaged by gluten, your body can begin to react to the gluten in your diet.
An early sign of a gluten immune reaction is that your body produces antibodies to the gluten in your diet. This can be seen in a blood test that looks for an antibody called the IgG-gliadin antibody (also known as anti-gliadin-antibody). Also the IgA-gliadin antibody can develop at this time.
Even in these early stages of gluten reactions (before the development of any gut damage of celiac disease), you or your child can be feeling unwell. Many of the symptoms of celiac disease can be recognized in these early stages. This is before the tissue damage can be seen by the histologist.
The blood test to look for tissue damage is called the tissue transglutaminase antibody (abbreviated as tTG).
Early bowel damage cannot be seen
The next thing to happen is that the tissue in the small bowel gets slightly injured but not enough to be identified by the histologist. However, such damage can be shown by an electron microscope. This early damage can also be detected by the presence of the tTG antibody.
Usually, when the tTG blood test goes up, then this is an indication to do the endoscopy and look for any tissue damage. However, early in the progression of celiac disease, this damage may not show up by conventional methods. This means that the small bowel biopsy and the histology results are good for confirming celiac disease, but they cannot rule it out.
To act or to wait?
In my experience, I have seen a number of children develop celiac disease whilst I have watched and waited. While we doctors wait and see if the gut will become progressively damaged, these children will continue to experience their gut symptoms and they may not be growing so well. We doctors are waiting to make a certain diagnosis of celiac disease. We want to repeat their blood tests and do another endoscopy.
Is this reasonable? Experience has changed my mind. I have come to the conclusion that this is not an appropriate way to deal with these children. Currently, most medical specialists are adamant. They will not make a diagnosis of celiac disease until the histologist can confirm the typical tissue damage.
How long can you wait?
I have given up the “wait and see” approach. I act. I carefully scrutinize the symptoms and the blood test results - the gluten antibodies (IgG-gliadin) and tissue damage antibody (tTG) levels. I may organise an endoscopy test. If these findings suggest the development of celiac disease, then I make a pre-emptive diagnosis of “early celiac disease”, often before the gut gets badly damaged. I give these children a trial of a gluten-free diet – I see what their clinical response is. Pleasingly, most get completely better! If they get better, then they want to stay gluten-free.
The problem is that the diagnosis of celiac disease currently hinges on the abnormal appearance of the small bowel. This damage can take years to develop.
The main argument against my approach is that if you do not have a “definite” diagnosis of celiac disease, then you cannot advise a gluten-free diet for life. In my opinion, the decision to go on a gluten-free diet is not a black and white choice. For children, I give them the option of a gluten-free diet early in their disease. Let them feel well. Let them grow properly. Later, as an adult, they can challenge their diagnosis and have a formal gluten challenge when they understand the issues.
Conclusion – my approach
As you can see, it is difficult to say how early you can diagnose celiac disease. It is my practice to carefully assess children regarding their symptoms, their antibody levels, their genetic status and their endoscopy results (if appropriate).
I do not think it is logical to leave children with significant symptoms waiting for the small bowel damage to eventually occur. Indeed, I think that these long delays in treatment are inhumane. Postponement of a gluten-free diet will cause these children to suffer ongoing symptoms. Worse, they can have growth failure, from which they may not recover.
My approach is to put these children on a gluten-free diet early. I watch and see if thy have a clinical response: if they get better. The evidence shows that you cannot rely entirely on the small bowel biopsy for your diagnosis of celiac disease. These children can have a gluten challenge later in their lives.
The onset of celiac disease is progressive. Why wait until the bitter end before going gluten-free? The onset of celiac disease is progressive. Why wait until the bitter end before going gluten-free? You can find out a lot more from my webpage: www.doctorgluten.com
Subscribe to free Celiac.com email alerts (1-3 email per month with the latest celiac disease research and information, gluten-free recipes, etc.).
Spread The Word
87 Responses to "How Early Can Celiac Disease Be Diagnosed?" 
|
said this on 09 Jan 2008 6:49:20 PM PST
Hear,
|
|
said this on 09 Jan 2008 8:27:50 PM PST
Final
|
|
said this on 10 Jan 2008 5:02:45 AM PST
This
|
|
said this on 10 Jan 2008 5:03:02 AM PST
Great
|
|
said this on 10 Jan 2008 5:16:26 AM PST
Thank
|
|
said this on 10 Jan 2008 5:26:36 AM PST
my 9
|
|
said this on 10 Jan 2008 5:27:47 AM PST
Logic
|
|
said this on 10 Jan 2008 5:46:06 AM PST
Final
my d |
|
said this on 10 Jan 2008 7:22:36 AM PST
This
|
|
said this on 10 Jan 2008 7:45:32 AM PST
My ad
|
|
said this on 10 Jan 2008 9:32:18 AM PST
Good
|
|
said this on 10 Jan 2008 9:40:09 AM PST
I thi
|
|
said this on 10 Jan 2008 10:24:22 AM PST
Good
|
|
said this on 10 Jan 2008 12:55:15 PM PST
What
|
|
said this on 10 Jan 2008 1:43:57 PM PST
Great
|
|
said this on 10 Jan 2008 3:12:09 PM PST
Final
|
|
said this on 10 Jan 2008 6:22:40 PM PST
YAY!!
|
|
said this on 10 Jan 2008 7:17:30 PM PST
I thi
|
|
said this on 10 Jan 2008 7:21:04 PM PST
I lov
|
|
said this on 10 Jan 2008 7:31:55 PM PST
A ver
|
|
said this on 10 Jan 2008 9:03:12 PM PST
My so
|
|
said this on 11 Jan 2008 8:02:34 AM PST
Good
|
|
said this on 11 Jan 2008 11:07:33 AM PST
Final
|
|
said this on 11 Jan 2008 11:30:10 AM PST
Bravo
|
|
said this on 13 Jan 2008 1:57:08 PM PST
I'm 4
|
|
said this on 15 Jan 2008 9:10:25 AM PST
My ch
I |
|
said this on 16 Jan 2008 2:45:09 PM PST
I jus
|
|
said this on 17 Jan 2008 9:06:54 AM PST
I had
|
|
said this on 17 Jan 2008 11:34:38 AM PST
I lov
|
|
said this on 17 Jan 2008 2:04:14 PM PST
Thank
|
|
said this on 17 Jan 2008 2:46:59 PM PST
It is
|
|
said this on 17 Jan 2008 7:57:38 PM PST
I am
|
|
said this on 17 Jan 2008 9:08:44 PM PST
Excel
|
|
said this on 18 Jan 2008 12:09:09 PM PST
Absol
|
|
said this on 18 Jan 2008 12:37:06 PM PST
Why n
Tha Shel |
|
said this on 19 Jan 2008 9:02:16 PM PST
What
|
|
said this on 23 Jan 2008 8:29:18 PM PST
Fanta
|
|
said this on 24 Jan 2008 9:44:06 AM PST
My ba
My B |
|
said this on 25 Jan 2008 1:07:47 PM PST
Very
|
|
said this on 29 Jan 2008 6:45:52 AM PST
Thank
|
|
said this on 02 Feb 2008 1:36:19 PM PST
I alw
|
|
said this on 10 Feb 2008 10:36:25 AM PST
Amen.
Tha |
|
said this on 17 Feb 2008 7:41:53 PM PST
I was
|
|
said this on 18 Feb 2008 11:34:33 AM PST
Thank
|
|
said this on 21 Feb 2008 7:24:17 AM PST
Thank
|
|
said this on 21 Feb 2008 4:41:46 PM PST
Bravo
'Th W A |
|
said this on 21 Feb 2008 6:37:11 PM PST
I hav
A |
|
said this on 21 Feb 2008 11:27:16 PM PST
This
|
|
said this on 22 Feb 2008 7:29:08 PM PST
Excel
|
|
said this on 25 Feb 2008 3:07:19 PM PST
Great
GI e |
|
said this on 28 Feb 2008 2:35:17 PM PST
My 12
|
|
said this on 01 Mar 2008 9:52:59 AM PST
'When
Th An |
|
said this on 20 Mar 2008 8:07:33 AM PST
I hav
|
|
said this on 20 Mar 2008 8:57:43 AM PST
Dr. R
|
|
said this on 20 Mar 2008 9:52:09 AM PST
Great
|
|
said this on 20 Mar 2008 11:45:42 AM PST
Well,
|
|
said this on 20 Mar 2008 2:25:00 PM PST
I hav
|
|
said this on 20 Mar 2008 5:23:39 PM PST
Like
|
|
said this on 20 Mar 2008 7:54:12 PM PST
I jus
|
|
said this on 21 Mar 2008 3:49:11 AM PST
I hav
I |
|
said this on 21 Mar 2008 10:55:58 AM PST
A gre
|
|
said this on 27 Mar 2008 12:19:08 PM PST
Good
|
|
said this on 27 Mar 2008 7:20:08 PM PST
I too
|
|
said this on 07 Apr 2008 1:41:30 AM PST
Docto
|
|
said this on 22 Apr 2008 1:54:57 AM PST
Thank
|
|
said this on 22 Apr 2008 1:21:55 PM PST
We ju
For |
|
said this on 23 Apr 2008 10:11:40 PM PST
I too
|
|
said this on 14 May 2008 2:44:23 PM PST
Very
|
|
said this on 19 May 2008 11:44:19 PM PST
Hopef
In |
|
said this on 20 May 2008 4:48:46 PM PST
I was
|
|
said this on 21 May 2008 6:26:14 AM PST
Excel
|
|
said this on 27 May 2008 10:01:27 AM PST
Thank
|
|
said this on 16 Jun 2008 8:55:46 PM PST
I hop
W |
|
said this on 22 Jul 2008 4:05:05 PM PST
Great
|
|
said this on 24 Jul 2008 8:31:24 AM PST
Exact
Best |
|
said this on 24 Jul 2008 9:54:21 AM PST
I spe
|
|
said this on 28 Jul 2008 5:49:30 AM PST
My (n
|
|
said this on 03 Aug 2008 12:02:59 PM PST
Our d
|
|
said this on 15 Sep 2008 7:13:12 AM PST
My hu
|
|
said this on 02 Oct 2008 1:51:36 PM PST
Our g
|
|
said this on 08 Nov 2008 11:34:10 AM PST
Wow!
|
|
said this on 05 Dec 2008 12:01:00 PM PST
Thank
On Than |
|
said this on 07 Mar 2009 4:27:23 PM PST
My so
|
|
said this on 06 Apr 2009 1:20:29 PM PST
THE B
|
|
said this on 17 Apr 2009 9:07:08 AM PST
I fin
|


Author)