Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Questions About My 5 Year Old


kpw31

Recommended Posts

kpw31 Rookie

My daughter has been complaining of abdominal pain, just about every day, for 5 months.  We have been seeing a GI and all of her blood work has come back normal except for her TTG-IGG which was at 25.  The dr said celiac disease is suspected if it's over 100 but 25 is still elevated.  She is also not IGA deficient.  Other than that all other tests have been fine.  They want to do an endoscopy now since we're still not getting any definitive answers but I don't want to do it unless we've exhausted all other options, just because it seems so invasive, especially for a child..  I guess what I want to know is: 

 

-Can she still have Celiac with just that one antibody being elevated?

-Can she still have visible damage that they would see with an endoscopy with her blood results being what they are?

 

 

I'd appreciate any advice thanks!

 

(her main complaint is the abdominal pain, and she doesn't eat as much at some meals because she says her tummy hurts, other than that, activity levels, growth, stool etc. seems to be normal)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



glutenfree7562 Newbie

If you really don't want to get the endoscopy done try first just going gluten free for 2-3 weeks. If her stomach aches go away or get better then just continue from there. I was 17 and terrified of the endoscopy idea, but i did it and it really wasn't bad. They just gave me an IV, I fell asleep, and I woke up later laying in the hospital bed. They gave me juice and I got dressed and my mom came and got me. It was super quick, and there was absolutely no pain. Im not trying to say you should do it, but if you end up having to bring your daughter in, its pretty easy and quick. And yes I think she would show damage with lowish levels, because if she eats gluten the night before, her villi will be flattened and there will be inflammation. For your question on just one being elevated, if it was really early along that could be possible. Everything varies with each person. But I would recommend trying the gluten free diet and if it helps, make it permanent. 

I would also recommend getting her tested for food allergies. I had just stomach aches, no other symptoms, when I was 13 and was diagnosed with milk and egg allergy. It wasn't until I started having severe pain  and diarrhea and complete loss of appetite at the age of 17 that I was diagnosed with celiac. 

nvsmom Community Regular

-Can she still have Celiac with just that one antibody being elevated?

-Can she still have visible damage that they would see with an endoscopy with her blood results being what they are?

Welcome to the boards.  :)

 

To answer you questions: yes and yes. We have board members who had positive endoscopic biopsies without ANY positive blood tests sn conversely, we have board members who had negative biopsies with multiple positive blood tests... Both groups have celiac though. If she has elevated tTG IgA levels, that means that damage has been done to the intestines. Usually it is caused by celiac but it can also be from infection or other autoimmune diseases. tTG IgA is 91-99% specific to celiac disease, which means out of 100 people with a positive tTG IgA, 91-99 of them are celiacs. This is the reposrt I took those numbers from, please look to page 11-12. Open Original Shared Link

 

The statement your doctor made that "celiac disease is suspected if it's over 100 but 25 is still elevated" does not make sense to me.  If 100 is your lab's upper limit for their normal reference range, then 25 is not really elevated - it is in the bottom 25% of the normal range.  I suspect that your daughter's result of 25 is near or above your lab's normal reference range but you doctor (for some unknown reason) wants a REALLY elevated result before he is willing to call it celiac.

 

Can you get copies of your daughter's lab report? I have found that it's a good idea to get copies of all labs because my doctors tend to err on the side of caution - meaning they do nothing unless my labs scream ABNORMAL at them.  I haven't had great doctors... yep, I'm bitter. LOL ;) It's always a good idea to act as a second check.

 

Perhaps also check if they ran the DGP IgA and DGP IgG tests on your daughter. They are very sensitive and specific celiac tests which are excellent for catching celiac disease in children.  Those two tests are only 5 years old and not all doctors know about them.  They might be worth requesting.

 

Best wishes.  I hope you find definite answers.

kpw31 Rookie

Thanks for the replies!

 

Caroline- it helps to hear that you had the same issue (just stomach aches, because I feel like everything I read about this has a huge list of symptoms and my daughter just seems to have the abdominal pain), do you think you actually had the milk and egg allergy or do you think it was celiac disease all along?

 

nvs-I don't have a copy of the labs but I am going to request them this week, when I talked to the dr on the phone she just said the TTG-IGG was a 25 and a normal level would be 5 but that in people with full blown celiac disease it can be over 100 (I don't really know what the numbers mean, or what context they're in).  I'm not sure if the other ones you mentioned were tested in the panel so I guess I'll see when I get copies of the lab results.

 

We are going to go ahead with the endoscopy so I guess we'll see what that shows, I don't want something to be wrong with my child but at least if they find that it is celiac we can get her the help she needs, it is so disconcerting to have her complaining about her stomach hurting all the time and not know what the cause is.

nvsmom Community Regular

If the upper limit of the test was 5, and she had a 25.... that's 5 times the upper limit so it is quite positive. Some celiacs do have ridiculously high test results but not all; a 25 is pretty high - especially in a child.

 

This report has more info on the tests and how the endoscopic biopsy results will be classified. It could be helpful:

Open Original Shared Link

 

I wish her luck with the endoscopy. I hope they find very clear results. If you can, request 6 or more biopsy samples be taken; the surface area of the small intestines is the size of a tennis court, so the more samples taken, the better the chances of observing any damage that is there.

 

Will her endoscopic bipsy be soon?

kpw31 Rookie

thanks again for the information. I actually just called to get a copy of the labs and  I'm waiting to hear from the hospital this week to schedule the endo. I'm hoping to do it before the end of the month.  I guess they just don't know until they look, I've been looking online about just the IGG being elevated and keep seeing conflicting information, some says it is a sign of celiac, other things say it usually means gluten intolerance or sensitivity hopefully we'll have more answers soon.

nvsmom Community Regular

... I've been looking online about just the IGG being elevated and keep seeing conflicting information, some says it is a sign of celiac, other things say it usually means gluten intolerance or sensitivity hopefully we'll have more answers soon.

 

The tTG  tests do not test for gluten sensitivity, they test for damage caused to the gut because some autoantibodies attacked the tissue transglutaminase enzymes found on the surface of the intestines. If you have a positive tTG test, it means damage has been done to the intestines - usually it is caused by celiac disease but it can be caused by other diseases or severe GI illnesses.

 

If she has a positive tTG, she has intestinal damage. It's just a matter of finding out what caused it now.

 

I like how these sites explain the tests:

Open Original Shared Link

 

Open Original Shared Link

 

Open Original Shared Link

 

The AGA tests are the only tests that show gluten (gliadin) sensitivity.

 

.... It's a confusing diagnostic process isn't it?  :(


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kpw31 Rookie

it is confusing and every time I think I get it I come up with more questions!

 

what else could cause intestinal damage?  

nvsmom Community Regular

Celiac disease is the most common cause of a positive tTG test. I believe a positive tTG is from celiac over 90% of the time. The other causes are often infection (like a serious bout of e.coli) or diseases like diabetes, crohn's, thyroiditis, or liver disease...usually it is celiac disease though. :( I am not sure if there are any other possible causes or not.

When you have a very positive test, it is less likely to be caused by other illnesses. Because your daughter's test was quite high, as opposed to a result of 6 or so, it is more likely to be related to celiac disease than other causes.

This Q&A site from the Celiac Disease Centre at the U of Chicago asks some good questions about tTg tests. There is lots of good info there if you search around it. Open Original Shared Link

Try to stay positive. If your daughter is going to have an illness, celiac disease is one of the better ones because you can put it into remission for life with just a diet change....and many of us end up eating healthier without as many processed foods. It is definitely inconvenient, but by catching it so early (if it is celiac disease, and I would guess it is) she won't have any long term complications.

You might want together everyone in the family tested while waiting for the endo. celiac disease is genetically linked so there is a chance others could have it.

Dr Green has a good book on celiac disease. There are a few other good ones out there. Raid your library if you can. There are a few good books for kids on celiac disease too that might come in handy in the future.

Best wishes!

kpw31 Rookie

I got copies of my daughter's blood work this weekend so it looks like the range for TGG IGG was 0-5 and she was 25 the first time she was tested and 23 the second time, anything over 9 says "positive."  I'm still confused ,with a normal IGA  can this be celiac? I'm still waiting to hear back from the hospital to schedule the endoscopy so hopefully that will happen soon.  There's more things on this report that I'm trying to decipher.

nvsmom Community Regular

I got copies of my daughter's blood work this weekend so it looks like the range for TGG IGG was 0-5 and she was 25 the first time she was tested and 23 the second time, anything over 9 says "positive."  I'm still confused ,with a normal IGA  can this be celiac?

Yes. The IgA is probably the "total serum IgA" which is just a control test (not a celiac test) to ensure that she produced enough IgA for the actual celiac tests that use IgA (tTG IgA, EMA IgA DGP IgA) are accurate. The test IgA levels because about 5% of celiacs are deficient in IgA and would thus have false negative tests.

 

If the range of her test is 0-5, and she was 4 to 5 times the upper limit, I would say that is quite positive and there is very little chance that the test result was caused by something else.

 

You could always request further blood work. The DGP tests are very good for children. The EMA IgA is a good tests but usually not accurate for kids as it usually indicates more advanced damage.

 

Good luck with the endoscopy.

kpw31 Rookie

thanks again.  they did the DGP and EMA in the panel and they were in the normal range the IGG was the only one that was flagged.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Clear2me's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Gluten free nuts

    2. - trents replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Latest Research
      6

      Study Estimates the Costs of Delayed Celiac Disease Diagnosis (+Video)

    5. - Wheatwacked replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LizzieE
    Newest Member
    LizzieE
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to see if they can get you the gluten-free version (they are tasty) > This past week I bought "Sliced Raw Almonds, Baking Nuts, 5 lbs Item 1495072 Best if used by Jun-10-26 W-261-6-L1A 12:47" at Costco. The package has the standard warning that it was made on machinery that <may> have processed wheat. Based on that alone, I would not eat these. However, I contacted customer service and asked them "are Costco's Sliced Almonds gluten free?" Within a day I got this response:  "This is [xyz] with the Costco Member Service Resolutions Team. I am happy to let you know we got a reply back from our Kirkland Signature team. Here is their response:  This item does not have a risk of cross contamination with gluten, barley or rye." Based on this, I will eat them. Based on experience, I believe they will be fine. Sometimes, for other products, the answer has been "they really do have cross-contamination risk" (eg, Kirkland Signature Dry Roasted Macadamia Nuts, Salted, 1.5 lbs Item 1195303). When they give me that answer I return them for cash. You might reasonably ask, "Why would Costco use that label if they actually are safe?" I can't speak for Costco but I've worked in Corporate America and I've seen this kind of thing first hand and up close. (1) This kind of regulatory label represents risk/cost to the company. What if they are mistaken? In one direction, the cost is loss of maybe 1% of sales (if celiacs don't buy when they would have). In the other direction, the risk is reputational damage and open-ended litigation (bad reviews and celiacs suing them). Expect them to play it safe. (2) There is a team tasked with getting each product out to market quickly and cheaply, and there is also a committee tasked with reviewing the packaging before it is released. If the team chooses the simplest, safest, pre-approved label, this becomes a quick check box. On the other hand, if they choose something else, it has to be carefully scrutinized through a long process. It's more efficient for the team to say there <could> be risk. (3) There is probably some plug and play in production. Some lots of the very same product could be made in a safe facility while others are made in an unsafe facility. Uniform packaging (saying there is risk) for all packages regardless of gluten risk is easier, cheaper, and safer (for Costco). Everything I wrote here is about my Costco experience, but the principles will be true at other vendors, particularly if they have extensive quality control infrastructure. The first hurdle of gluten-free diet is to remove/replace all the labeled gluten ingredients. The second, more difficult hurdle is to remove/replace all the hidden gluten. Each of us have to assess gray zones and make judgement calls knowing there is a penalty for being wrong. One penalty would be getting glutened but the other penalty could be eating an unnecessarily boring or malnourishing diet.
    • trents
      Thanks for the thoughtful reply and links, Wheatwacked. Definitely some food for thought. However, I would point out that your linked articles refer to gliadin in human breast milk, not cow's milk. And although it might seem reasonable to conclude it would work the same way in cows, that is not necessarily the case. Studies seem to indicate otherwise. Studies also indicate the amount of gliadin in human breast milk is miniscule and unlikely to cause reactions:  https://www.glutenfreewatchdog.org/news/gluten-peptides-in-human-breast-milk-implications-for-cows-milk/ I would also point out that Dr. Peter Osborne's doctorate is in chiropractic medicine, though he also has studied and, I believe, holds some sort of certifications in nutritional science. To put it plainly, he is considered by many qualified medical and nutritional professionals to be on the fringe of quackery. But he has a dedicated and rabid following, nonetheless.
    • Scott Adams
      I'd be very cautious about accepting these claims without robust evidence. The hypothesis requires a chain of biologically unlikely events: Gluten/gliadin survives the cow's rumen and entire digestive system intact. It is then absorbed whole into the cow's bloodstream. It bypasses the cow's immune system and liver. It is then secreted, still intact and immunogenic, into the milk. The cow's digestive system is designed to break down proteins, not transfer them whole into milk. This is not a recognized pathway in veterinary science. The provided backup shifts from cow's milk to human breastmilk, which is a classic bait-and-switch. While the transfer of food proteins in human breastmilk is a valid area of study, it doesn't validate the initial claim about commercial dairy. The use of a Dr. Osborne video is a major red flag. His entire platform is based on the idea that all grains are toxic, a view that far exceeds the established science on Celiac Disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and a YouTube video from a known ideological source is not that evidence."  
    • Wheatwacked
      Some backup to my statement about gluten and milk. Some background.  When my son was born in 1976 he was colicky from the beginning.  When he transitioned to formula it got really bad.  That's when we found the only pediactric gastroenterologist (in a population of 6 million that dealt with Celiac Disease (and he only had 14 patients with celiac disease), who dianosed by biopsy and started him on Nutramegen.  Recovery was quick. The portion of gluten that passes through to breastmilk is called gliadin. It is the component of gluten that causes celiac disease or gluten intolerance. What are the Effects of Gluten in Breastmilk? Gliaden, a component of gluten which is typically responsible for the intestinal reaction of gluten, DOES pass through breast milk.  This is because gliaden (as one of many food proteins) passes through the lining of your small intestine into your blood. Can gluten transmit through breast milk?  
    • trents
      I don't know of a connection. Lots of people who don't have celiac disease/gluten issues get shingles.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.