Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Testing


lamusto

Recommended Posts

lamusto Newbie

Just a quick observation and question about genetic testing, et.al.   I suspect that the tummy aches and diarrhea, a bit of ADD, over the course of over 7 years a few other things might be gluten problems, be they celiac disease or sensitivity.  Having read many comments about the use or uselessness of genetic testing, for me right now - it might be a good thing for the following reasons: first cost.  Due to reasons not worth going into at this point, much of it would come out of pocket until January.  Given the lower cost of the genetic testing, for me, would help me to narrow it down.  If he does not have the gene(s), then I can at least rule out a strong genetic component - which has it's use.  i realize that 40% or so had the gene(s) anyway, but it still helps me narrow the matter down.  That does not mean I cannot pursue further testing in January for blood antibody markers, etc. or other issues.  For me it's a start.  In light of that, is Enterolab reliable for that genetic testing?  I have seen various things about testing and it's reliability here which I understand.  I only was unclear about how reliable Enterolab was on the genetic testing.  Thanks in advance for your replies.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

I wouldn't use Enterolab for anything.  The genetic tests are probably accurate but a lot of the other stuff they "test" for isn't medically accepted.

I got my genetic test from Quest.  But it seems to me that the basic Celiac blood panel (for antibodies) was about the same price as the genetic test.  You can call them and ask.

lamusto Newbie
2 minutes ago, kareng said:

I wouldn't use Enterolab for anything.  The genetic tests are probably accurate but a lot of the other stuff they "test" for isn't medically accepted.

I got my genetic test from Quest.  But it seems to me that the basic Celiac blood panel (for antibodies) was about the same price as the genetic test.  You can call them and ask.

I don't see a clear distinction between looking for antibodies verses looking for particular genes.  That part wasn't clear to me from reading their options.  I don't think  one can order the strict genetic test without the stool test.  But I submitted a question to them regarding that.  Thank you so much for your reply.  I will look into "Quest".

Gemini Experienced
2 hours ago, lamusto said:

I don't see a clear distinction between looking for antibodies verses looking for particular genes.  That part wasn't clear to me from reading their options.  I don't think  one can order the strict genetic test without the stool test.  But I submitted a question to them regarding that.  Thank you so much for your reply.  I will look into "Quest".

Enterolab's gene testing is very reliable as gene testing is very common now and straightforward.  There is nothing questionable about it.  However, the other stool testing that they offer is not currently recognized as reliable and it isn't.  You cannot test for Celiac Disease utilizing stool samples, as of yet.  Maybe someday someone will come up with one that is peer reviewed and accepted by mainstream medicine but don't waste your money on it now. 

I had my gene testing done through Enterolab because doctors didn't do gene testing for Celiac 12 years ago when I was diagnosed. The blood work version done in hospitals was too expensive and they have antibody testing for Celiac.  I was diagnosed with Celiac through blood work from mainstream medical doctors, along with positive genetic tests from Enterolab. You should be able to order gene testing by itself through them but if they bundle it with other tests, I wouldn't bother.

 

ravenwoodglass Mentor

In addition to the advice you have already gotten one caution. If you should happen to not have one of the 2 genes most commonly checked for it isn't for sure that you couldn't be celiac. There are rare cases, like mine, where people are diagnosed celiac but don't carry one of those two genes.  Getting a celiac panel is IMHO a better route to take.  Also if you have a low income or no insurance check with your local hospital as some will do a sliding fee scale on tests done through them.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,436
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Vivien Armstrong
    Newest Member
    Vivien Armstrong
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.