Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Celiac and IUGR


selectivefocus

Recommended Posts

selectivefocus Enthusiast

Does anyone have experience with Celiac during pregnancy?

This is my first pregnancy since being diagnosed in January 2017. I went for a growth scan at 28 weeks (10 days ago) and it looks like she has asymmetrical IUGR. This is my 4th baby. I have never had any issues like this. Her abdomen is measuring about 3 weeks behind.

I should add that I have been glutened a few times by accident. I'm now strictly eating at home only for this reason.

I have changed my diet since that scan and I'm really pushing clean protein (like chicken breast) and organic whole milk. I know my gut is doing ok because the milk is not bothering me at all. I have been avoiding dairy up until this point but after researching IUGR and nutrition changed my diet. I think I might not have been getting the nutrition I needed.

Please only respond if you have been pregnant with Celiac. Thanks.

  • 4 weeks later...

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Scott Adams Grand Master

Ok, I've not been pregnant but still want to see how things are going, and did you find out anything new that you can share that might help others?

selectivefocus Enthusiast
6 hours ago, Scott Adams said:

Ok, I've not been pregnant but still want to see how things are going, and did you find out anything new that you can share that might help others?

IUGR is relatively common in Celiac pregnant women, although my doctor has been unconcerned about it. I'm an informed patient however.

After that appointment I stopped eating ALL grains, with the exception of simple kneads bread, which is a fermented sourdough but has no oats, rice, corn or eggs. (Sidebar: it's an excellent bread and I recommend it to everyone, you can order it online). I increased my protein to at least 80g a day, and I started drinking 4 16oz glasses of organic whole milk per day, as well as 3 organic bananas per day. I stopped eating any food that was not prepared in my house. I don't touch any processed gluten free foods. Not pasta, not waffles, nothing in a box.

At my 32 week appointment her growth had totally caught up. Her head and femur were measuring above average while her abdominal measurement was spot on at 32 weeks. So in 4 weeks, she went from measuring 25 weeks for abdominal circumference to measuring 32 weeks. That is a massive jump in growth. I'm still having weekly ultrasounds and biophysical profiles. I'm having a csection so as long as I can get her to 7lbs and 39 weeks we will be good.

Celiac is such a complicated disease, ESPECIALLY while pregnant. My doctor told me there was "not much I could do". I didn't believe that-- your baby gets nutrients from you. I didn't have any diagnosed placental issues, so I either wasn't eating the right foods or my absorption was compromised or both. I researched and researched and found the Dr. Brewer pregnancy diet (which most women should be educated on--similar to the Weston Price pregnancy and fertility diet). I tailored that to my specific needs and it has made a massive difference.

Whether you are pregnant or not, if you are still sick although you have adopted a "gluten free diet", eliminating all grains unless naturally fermented is highly recommended. Many celiacs stay sick because they keep eating oats or brown rice etc. (Or processed boxed "gluten free" items) and their proteins are extremely similar to gliadin. Many celiacs also have intolerances to soy, xanthan gum, tapioca, and starches like corn and arrowroot which they may not even realize. ALL celiacs should have an extensive food allergy panel done after they have been gluten free for a few months. Gluten is just the tip of the iceberg.

  • 1 year later...
HappyMama Newbie

I’m pregnant with my third and my first two had IUGR.  Both times my placenta was “mature” and I had to go in for weekly Doppler tests on the umbilical cord, which had fallen below ideal ranges, and non stress tests. I had successful induced labors at 38 weeks for both. They both weighed 5lbs at birth but quickly caught up by 3mos to the 50th percentile. I’m a very careful gluten-free eater and have also been diagnosed with IBS, so I’m not sure if that has anything to do with it. I’m 20 weeks now so we’ll see if this baby shows up with IUGR in the coming weeks. 
My normal weight is considered underweight and usually struggle to put weight on but I thankfully gained 25-30lbs for each baby. 
I just learned that celiac might have something to do with the fetal growth issues! No one ever told me and honestly with so many people on gluten-free diets these days I just think of it as a lifestyle vs a disease and didn’t consider it being the culprit.

Some side notes: I also get terrible morning sickness, hyperemesis gravidarum status, through 17 wks. I think I read that can be an issue with celiac mothers and/or lead to placenta issues. I fed my babies with formula and could only provide little breastmilk through 5 weeks. So I clearly have other stuff going on but maybe this sheds some hope on someone looking for answers. My girls are as healthy as can be! 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Clear2me's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Gluten free nuts

    2. - trents replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Latest Research
      6

      Study Estimates the Costs of Delayed Celiac Disease Diagnosis (+Video)

    5. - Wheatwacked replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LizzieE
    Newest Member
    LizzieE
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to see if they can get you the gluten-free version (they are tasty) > This past week I bought "Sliced Raw Almonds, Baking Nuts, 5 lbs Item 1495072 Best if used by Jun-10-26 W-261-6-L1A 12:47" at Costco. The package has the standard warning that it was made on machinery that <may> have processed wheat. Based on that alone, I would not eat these. However, I contacted customer service and asked them "are Costco's Sliced Almonds gluten free?" Within a day I got this response:  "This is [xyz] with the Costco Member Service Resolutions Team. I am happy to let you know we got a reply back from our Kirkland Signature team. Here is their response:  This item does not have a risk of cross contamination with gluten, barley or rye." Based on this, I will eat them. Based on experience, I believe they will be fine. Sometimes, for other products, the answer has been "they really do have cross-contamination risk" (eg, Kirkland Signature Dry Roasted Macadamia Nuts, Salted, 1.5 lbs Item 1195303). When they give me that answer I return them for cash. You might reasonably ask, "Why would Costco use that label if they actually are safe?" I can't speak for Costco but I've worked in Corporate America and I've seen this kind of thing first hand and up close. (1) This kind of regulatory label represents risk/cost to the company. What if they are mistaken? In one direction, the cost is loss of maybe 1% of sales (if celiacs don't buy when they would have). In the other direction, the risk is reputational damage and open-ended litigation (bad reviews and celiacs suing them). Expect them to play it safe. (2) There is a team tasked with getting each product out to market quickly and cheaply, and there is also a committee tasked with reviewing the packaging before it is released. If the team chooses the simplest, safest, pre-approved label, this becomes a quick check box. On the other hand, if they choose something else, it has to be carefully scrutinized through a long process. It's more efficient for the team to say there <could> be risk. (3) There is probably some plug and play in production. Some lots of the very same product could be made in a safe facility while others are made in an unsafe facility. Uniform packaging (saying there is risk) for all packages regardless of gluten risk is easier, cheaper, and safer (for Costco). Everything I wrote here is about my Costco experience, but the principles will be true at other vendors, particularly if they have extensive quality control infrastructure. The first hurdle of gluten-free diet is to remove/replace all the labeled gluten ingredients. The second, more difficult hurdle is to remove/replace all the hidden gluten. Each of us have to assess gray zones and make judgement calls knowing there is a penalty for being wrong. One penalty would be getting glutened but the other penalty could be eating an unnecessarily boring or malnourishing diet.
    • trents
      Thanks for the thoughtful reply and links, Wheatwacked. Definitely some food for thought. However, I would point out that your linked articles refer to gliadin in human breast milk, not cow's milk. And although it might seem reasonable to conclude it would work the same way in cows, that is not necessarily the case. Studies seem to indicate otherwise. Studies also indicate the amount of gliadin in human breast milk is miniscule and unlikely to cause reactions:  https://www.glutenfreewatchdog.org/news/gluten-peptides-in-human-breast-milk-implications-for-cows-milk/ I would also point out that Dr. Peter Osborne's doctorate is in chiropractic medicine, though he also has studied and, I believe, holds some sort of certifications in nutritional science. To put it plainly, he is considered by many qualified medical and nutritional professionals to be on the fringe of quackery. But he has a dedicated and rabid following, nonetheless.
    • Scott Adams
      I'd be very cautious about accepting these claims without robust evidence. The hypothesis requires a chain of biologically unlikely events: Gluten/gliadin survives the cow's rumen and entire digestive system intact. It is then absorbed whole into the cow's bloodstream. It bypasses the cow's immune system and liver. It is then secreted, still intact and immunogenic, into the milk. The cow's digestive system is designed to break down proteins, not transfer them whole into milk. This is not a recognized pathway in veterinary science. The provided backup shifts from cow's milk to human breastmilk, which is a classic bait-and-switch. While the transfer of food proteins in human breastmilk is a valid area of study, it doesn't validate the initial claim about commercial dairy. The use of a Dr. Osborne video is a major red flag. His entire platform is based on the idea that all grains are toxic, a view that far exceeds the established science on Celiac Disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and a YouTube video from a known ideological source is not that evidence."  
    • Wheatwacked
      Some backup to my statement about gluten and milk. Some background.  When my son was born in 1976 he was colicky from the beginning.  When he transitioned to formula it got really bad.  That's when we found the only pediactric gastroenterologist (in a population of 6 million that dealt with Celiac Disease (and he only had 14 patients with celiac disease), who dianosed by biopsy and started him on Nutramegen.  Recovery was quick. The portion of gluten that passes through to breastmilk is called gliadin. It is the component of gluten that causes celiac disease or gluten intolerance. What are the Effects of Gluten in Breastmilk? Gliaden, a component of gluten which is typically responsible for the intestinal reaction of gluten, DOES pass through breast milk.  This is because gliaden (as one of many food proteins) passes through the lining of your small intestine into your blood. Can gluten transmit through breast milk?  
    • trents
      I don't know of a connection. Lots of people who don't have celiac disease/gluten issues get shingles.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.