Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Anti-gliadin Numbers...


Guest Leidenschaft

Recommended Posts

Guest Leidenschaft

Hi all... part of my yearly routine is blood work monitoring my anti-gliadin numbers... the doctor just phoned me and told me that my number this year is 10 points higher than last! :o

Normal is (apparently) 25, last year I was 26 :) but this year I am 36! :blink: I do NOT intentionally ingest gluten and know when I've done it by accident. She suggests that I'm not managing my diet as well as before, but I don't feel like I take any more chances or that I'm exposed to gluten more frequently than the previous year! :unsure:

Anyway, is it possible that the numbers fluctuate and are influenced by gluten ingested in the few days before the bloodwork? Or does this number really represent my overall state of being gluten-free?

Last question, would it be beneficial for me to have the bloodwork done more often than once per year?

Thanks in advance for any input! :D

Tammy


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guest Leidenschaft

Nobody has any input on this??? :o

Bumping it up before it's lost all togehter! :huh:

Guest Viola

I think that's an interesting question. Perhaps being contaminated on the day of the test does push it up. Are you going to try and run the test again ... say in a month or so?

I think I'll ask for a full panel when I go in next month and see what mine are.

Has anyone else found there results higher after going gluten free? It would be really interesting to know if a contamination can push the numbers up so high.

tiredofdoctors Enthusiast

I know that mine have fluctuated. I started at either 34 or 36, then went down to 24, then went up to 60. I'm going to be tested in March because it will be 6 months that I have been gluten-free. If it's still at 60, I'm going to be really frustrated, because I have been more compliant with this diet than I have been compliant with ANY medical treatment throughout my life. I did read, in some article somewhere (I have become addicted to Medline) that your body can actually increase your antigliadin levels despite adherence to a gluten-free diet. (Again, don't know where I read that, so I can't tell you for sure that it's a valid study). Funny, though, I never looked to see what "normal" was. No wonder my neuro said that my first test was "high", but my last one was "EXTREMELY high" :huh: If I find that article, or talk to anyone who knows, I'll let you know . . . Lynne

Guest Viola

Lynne ...Maybe the last couple of days before you get tested, go right back to 'fresh only' foods and see what happens.

I suspect that maybe if on the day, or the day before testing, you are contaminated somehow, it might push the numbers up. So ... If you eat only what cannot be cross-contaminated, and be super careful about what a 'gluten' person touches "for instance the telephone while eating a sandwich" etc. My theary is that they should be lower numbers.

At least that would explain why they would be high if you are pretty careful of your diet.

tiredofdoctors Enthusiast

Thanks Shirley -- I didn't even think of that! My husband is pretty much gluten-free, too -- we don't have very much gluten-containing food in the house anymore -- BUT -- he gets subs, etc. at work, and grazes on them during the day. I'll bet that's EXACTLY what happened! You are so smart :D . . . .Lynne

Guest Viola

:lol: I'm not too sure about being so Smart, I just know that Tammy is very strict with her diet and that's the only thing that I could think of that would push the numbers that high. She can't remember if she was contaminated that day, or the day before though.

Tam, I think you should go and run another test as well, this time stick really close to the absolute basics and see if it makes a difference. It would certainly prove that even tiny amounts of contamination does big damage, if that's the case.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,627
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    kathrynhmarks
    Newest Member
    kathrynhmarks
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Inkie
      I  notice a reaction to tea bags, possibly due to gluten or other substances. Is this recognizable?
    • trents
      The blood tests you had done are not the main ones. The two main ones are the "Total IGA" (to check for IGA deficiency) and the "TTG-IGA". Current guidelines for the "gluten challenge" when people have been gluten free for a significant time period are the daily consumption of at least10g of gluten (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for at least two weeks leading up to the day of the blood draw. That should give you some perspective.
    • Xravith
      Thank you, really.  I took a test for DGP-IgA and DGP-IgG. Effectively, it is not enough to discard Celiac Disease. I was consuming gluten until then, I only started gluten-free some days ago, when the symptoms became horrible and now I feel considerably better, which is a second confirmation that gluten is the main problem. It's been more than 4 years I have the same suspect, when I first thought gluten was causing me problems, I made a gluten-free diet for a year, I felt really good as never before. However, neither I or my parents were well informed about Celiac disease, so none of us tried to make further exams. My father suffer digestive problems and other members of my family as well. Unfortunately, no one have ever been tested for Celiac disease. I'll have to restart eating gluten in the next weeks, so I can make a serious blood test in laboratory, hopefully between two or three months.
    • trents
      As Scott said, in order for celiac disease testing to be valid, you need to be eating generous amounts of gluten on a regular basis for weeks or months before the blood draw. The blood tests are designed to detect antibodies that the immune system produces in response to the ingestion of gluten. It takes time for them to build up in the blood to detectable levels.
    • Scott Adams
      Based on what you've described, it is absolutely crucial that you pursue further medical exams for Celiac Disease and related conditions with a gastroenterologist. Your symptoms—especially the worsening fatigue, loss of muscle mass, neurological symptoms like migraines, and palpitations, coupled with being underweight—are significant red flags that extend beyond typical IBS. The negative home test is not reliable, particularly given your concern about sample contamination and the fact that you were likely not consuming sufficient gluten at the time for the test to be accurate, which is a common issue. While probiotics like Bifidobacterium Infantis can support gut health, they cannot resolve an autoimmune response to gluten or heal intestinal damage caused by Celiac Disease. Your declining blood test results, even if still "in range," further indicate a trend that needs a doctor's investigation. Please do not hesitate to seek a specialist; a formal diagnosis is the first step toward getting the correct treatment, allowing your body to heal, and finally addressing your weight and overall health concerns. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.