Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Need To Decide To Biopsy Or Not.....help Please!


Wendyp

Recommended Posts

Wendyp Rookie

I was confirmed via biopsy about a month ago and promptly took the kids for bloodtesting. My oldest (age 11)came back positive on all three areas (not in front of me now but I know the ttg was 29 (1-5 being normal), positive on endomysial, and positive iga (?)). He reall doesn't have any symptoms. He is on the very thin side, but not sickly looking. He's had some moodiness and irratiability over the past six months, off and on.

The pediatric gi doc. confirmed that these are all signs and says he will have to go on a gluten-free diet, whether or not the biopsy is positive. She said she expects to find damage.

Here's my question: We are still paying off bills from medical testing I had last year and have a high deductable, which would mean we will end up pay over $1,500 for my sons biopsy. While I know that is not a super high amount in the grand scheme of his lifetime, there are other areas that need attention now (speech therapy for another child, educational testing for the celiac child,...you know, the list goes on and on). Of course there is also the small risks associated with the procedure, although I'm really not concerned that anything will go wrong.

The reason the doc gave for the biopsy is so that it will proove to my son he has it, and so that the biopsy (gold standard) will be part of his permanent record.

What to do??????? Any words of wisdom???


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



AmandaD Community Regular

I have three kids myself - and biopsy proven celiac. If it were my children - even though it's an expensive deductible, etc...I would have the biopsy done.

So many people question celiac - especially when it's in children. They can be kind of crappy to parents until they understand that the child has the full, gold standard diagnosis and then you can actually target your treatment plan accordingly; there will never be a question in your mind either that your child does or doesn't have it.

I think the biopsy also helps look for other things - like possible gastritis or inflammation and it's sort of a sense of peace knowing somebody's been in there and given it a good look around.

Just my op...AMandaD

I was confirmed via biopsy about a month ago and promptly took the kids for bloodtesting. My oldest (age 11)came back positive on all three areas (not in front of me now but I know the ttg was 29 (1-5 being normal), positive on endomysial, and positive iga (?)). He reall doesn't have any symptoms. He is on the very thin side, but not sickly looking. He's had some moodiness and irratiability over the past six months, off and on.

The pediatric gi doc. confirmed that these are all signs and says he will have to go on a gluten-free diet, whether or not the biopsy is positive. She said she expects to find damage.

Here's my question: We are still paying off bills from medical testing I had last year and have a high deductable, which would mean we will end up pay over $1,500 for my sons biopsy. While I know that is not a super high amount in the grand scheme of his lifetime, there are other areas that need attention now (speech therapy for another child, educational testing for the celiac child,...you know, the list goes on and on). Of course there is also the small risks associated with the procedure, although I'm really not concerned that anything will go wrong.

The reason the doc gave for the biopsy is so that it will proove to my son he has it, and so that the biopsy (gold standard) will be part of his permanent record.

What to do??????? Any words of wisdom???

CMWeaver Apprentice

I have two daughters who were approaching age 4 when we were introduced to the entire gluten-free terminology. One of them WAS very sick. Her bloodwork was clearly positive and she did have the biopsy. Simply because the bloodwork was SO high they intended to find a lymphoma in her instestines. The other, who was not showing symptoms had the blood testing done. She too was positive. We chose not to have the biopsy done with her. We chose not to for a few reasons 1) I myself was having surgery for an unrelated matter and 2) going gluten-free was something we were going to do anyway since both were positive, I didn't feel I needed to have the biopsy paperwork on both of them.

If you feel that you will be eligible for the 7.5% medical tax deduction on medical expenses (visits, surgeries, price of gluten-free food compared to regular) the biopsy is confirmation that the diet and special food is a medical necessity and not something you "think" your child would need. However, at the age of 5 we have already gotten a hard time from my husband's insurance company. They bawked a bit at covering the one with the biopsy since there was a "pre-existing" condition. We had to have her GI write a letter stating that on the gluten-free diet, the condition would improve and pose no more than normal health related conditions as long as it was adhered to.

So, I suppose this is really what YOU prefer. No real right or wrong answer in my opinion. Whatever is best for your family.

Guest nini

I have a five year old with celiac and I have celiac... my numbers were extremely elevated but I did not have the biopsy AND STILL had a hard time getting and keeping health insurance because of the Celiac dx... My daughter did not have the biopsy either, but was dx'ed based on positive dietary response and genetic predisposition... I will not have the biopsy, and I will not put my daughter through it. We've improved so much on the gluten free diet that hopefully at this point any damage is all healed anyway.

In my opinion the biopsy is not necessary at all if the blood work was positive and regardless of results of the biopsy, you would have to put him on the diet anyway... don't do it. That's my opinion.

As far as this "gold standard" dx is concerned, the current thinking on this is that it is no longer the gold standard as the biopsy only shows the most advanced stages of Celiac... the bloodwork and dietary response would be more that enough to dx Celiac, and a Dr. that is still insisting on a biopsy, is operating on outdated information. (it's ok, most of them still are).

So, my input would be you do not need to put him through this. You KNOW he has is, just as I KNOW my daughter has it.

BTW she's been gluten free 2 1/2 years now and is doing amazingly well...

jadobson Newbie

Don't bx. We too had similar issues. I chose not to bx as we don't respond to anesthia very well. Within a few months he had gained some weight and I could easily see the difference. Our doctors agreed to label him with it without the dx based on the increase weight and dispostion. Go with your gut feeling. Mine was no bx was needed when all it would do was give us a label that didn't really matter to us, we were going gluten free either way.

Julie

TCA Contributor

We have excellent insurace and my son (just turned 3) has had 2 biopsies over the past 18 mos. Both were negative, but he had 2 very high antibodies, tooth enamel defects, failure to thrive, chronnic diarrhea, developmental delays, gas, etc. Even though the biopsies were negative, we decided to put him on a gluten-free diet as a trial and he is a different child. No diarrhea, he told me his tummy didn't hurt and he had never even told me it did (he probably didn't know any better), he has increased a clothing size and gained a pound for the first time in 9 mos. All this and we're in the 4th week of the diet. If I knew then what I do now, I would not have bothered with the biopsies. The diet has been the proof for us. If you try the diet unsuccessfully, you might want to do it then, but what's the use if you're going to do the diet anyway?

Electra375 Newbie

You want a firm medical dx for a 504 for school.

You want a firm medical dx for special services if you qualify otherwise

You want a firm medical dx to help with diet adherance in the teen years at 11 that is close. Teens come back notoriously negative on biopsy for some reason.

Dr. Fasano states that a non-compliant celiac disease through the teen years will develope type I diabetes by age 30. And as most of us know Type I diabetes is non-reversible and a life long necessity for insulin.

(We saw dr fasano last week and asked if there was a medical necessity for a biopsy -- his answer was getting teens to comply)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Awol cast iron stomach replied to Tanya177's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      6

      Worried about being isolated

    2. - trents replied to The Logician's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      3

      Gluten Sensitivity

    3. - The Logician replied to The Logician's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      3

      Gluten Sensitivity

    4. - trents replied to The Logician's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      3

      Gluten Sensitivity

    5. - The Logician posted a topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      3

      Gluten Sensitivity


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,988
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    John drage
    Newest Member
    John drage
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Awol cast iron stomach
      Hi, I have worked in education in the past. Based on where assigned and building crowding I made adjustments when needed.  I understand completely what you mentioned. I brought food from home in my own Pyrex glass container.  I kept it in my own lunch tote that I kept with me during the day. In the teacher's lounge/staff lunch room I would wipe down the area I sat at with soap and water with disposable paper towel.  I also placed down a fabric placemat prior to unpacking my meal. Unfortunately, one district I could never use the microwaves as they were filled with splatters and crumbs. (To be honest at that one school even if I didn't have this condition, I would not have used those microwaves based on their state of cleanliness). There were mini lockers nearby that I kept my placemat in. I brought my placemat  home weekly to launder.  There were times if the staff had a celebration with cake or pizza I would eat outside or in my car . As the  eating tables also had to display the  party spread. So the pizza and cake was on the communal lunch tables. Those days I just diverted to outside on the grass or my car. When I was fortunate to have a consistent schedule many staff "knew" my spot, and it was usually empty when I arrived. Occasionally, it was taken and it normally was by a substitute who didn't know about me/my situation.  I hope you are able to navigate this new change of building/assignment. I do know these days many districts have crowding and teachers often share classrooms or the same desk. This was often my experience whether in teacher or support staff role. Some districts you don't even have your own desk or space. I hope you do have some space to retreat to when possible. There often times is that awkwardness of a new schedule assignment where they ask why you don't want cake, pizza ,or always bring your lunch etc. For me that happened in every job education or business sector as often times I was the only one with this condition.  I hope this may have offered some support to lessen your anxiety about the new school year  assignment change. Best wishes     
    • trents
      People get genetic modification confused with hybridization. Wheat, as has most of our food crops, has been altered through hybridization to make it more disease resistant, more drought resistant and even to increase the gluten content. Hybridization uses selective breeding/cross pollination to enhance certain characteristics. Genetic modification, on the other hand, uses a "gene gun" to knock out certain genes and replace them with unnatural ones. In some cases, plant genes are replaced with animal genes to achieve certain properties. This is what GMO is about. Have you actually been formerly tested for celiac disease, either by blood antibody testing, biopsy or both, to rule out celiac disease?
    • The Logician
      Thank you for your response. I have had several different antibiotics over the years and none affected my sensitivity to wheat products which I assumed was due to the gluten in them. However I do believe this time it was an antibiotic I’ve never had before so if your explanation is correct it would seem this antibiotic (cefuroxime 500 MG tablet Commonly known as: CEFTIN, 1 tablet by mouth 2 (Two) Times a Day for 10 days.)  could be a cure for my sort of sensitivity. I assume the hospital IV was the same antibiotic. The IV was ordered because my blood culture showed bacteria in my blood. I remember hearing years ago the gmo wheat was found in some products but I guess that was a misnomer. Believe me after over 20 years of putting up with this sensitivity, despite the fact that growing up eating subs, pizza and spaghetti regularly never affected me, I am so relieved to no longer have to avoid wheat.. I hope!
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @The Logician! Many antibiotics have anti-inflammatory properties. By the way, GMO wheat is not used in food products: https://www.chefsresource.com/faq/is-wheat-genetically-modified-in-the-united-states/ There is a common misconception that it is.
    • The Logician
      I do not have celiac disease however for 20 years-plus I have been sensitive to gluten. A slice of bread will give me diarrhea in less than an hour. This started with me around the time I believe GMO wheat was beginning to appear in products on the market. Last week i went into the hospital to get antibiotic IV for three days. While there I was constipated so I figured eating gluten would fix that. I had gluten at every meal and it had no affect on me. I was still constipated until I got home and hen started having normal bowel movements even though I continued eating gluten products and I have never felt better! Not even a hint of diarrhea. I’ve eaten some gluten in bread, cream of wheat, pizza every day now for 7 days and still no reaction. I have read that antibiotics may cause gluten sensitivity but not the opposite.  I’m wondering if my gluten sensitivity was not to gluten but a sensitivity to how gluten reacted to a bacteria (good or bad) in my gut. A bacteria which has been removed by the antibiotics I am taking. I stopped antibiotics today. My doctor had no clue why this occurred and wasn’t interested in finding out so I’d like to know if this information could be helpful to anyone studying gluten sensitivity.
×
×
  • Create New...