Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Need To Decide To Biopsy Or Not.....help Please!


Wendyp

Recommended Posts

Wendyp Rookie

I was confirmed via biopsy about a month ago and promptly took the kids for bloodtesting. My oldest (age 11)came back positive on all three areas (not in front of me now but I know the ttg was 29 (1-5 being normal), positive on endomysial, and positive iga (?)). He reall doesn't have any symptoms. He is on the very thin side, but not sickly looking. He's had some moodiness and irratiability over the past six months, off and on.

The pediatric gi doc. confirmed that these are all signs and says he will have to go on a gluten-free diet, whether or not the biopsy is positive. She said she expects to find damage.

Here's my question: We are still paying off bills from medical testing I had last year and have a high deductable, which would mean we will end up pay over $1,500 for my sons biopsy. While I know that is not a super high amount in the grand scheme of his lifetime, there are other areas that need attention now (speech therapy for another child, educational testing for the celiac child,...you know, the list goes on and on). Of course there is also the small risks associated with the procedure, although I'm really not concerned that anything will go wrong.

The reason the doc gave for the biopsy is so that it will proove to my son he has it, and so that the biopsy (gold standard) will be part of his permanent record.

What to do??????? Any words of wisdom???


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



AmandaD Community Regular

I have three kids myself - and biopsy proven celiac. If it were my children - even though it's an expensive deductible, etc...I would have the biopsy done.

So many people question celiac - especially when it's in children. They can be kind of crappy to parents until they understand that the child has the full, gold standard diagnosis and then you can actually target your treatment plan accordingly; there will never be a question in your mind either that your child does or doesn't have it.

I think the biopsy also helps look for other things - like possible gastritis or inflammation and it's sort of a sense of peace knowing somebody's been in there and given it a good look around.

Just my op...AMandaD

  Wendyp said:
I was confirmed via biopsy about a month ago and promptly took the kids for bloodtesting. My oldest (age 11)came back positive on all three areas (not in front of me now but I know the ttg was 29 (1-5 being normal), positive on endomysial, and positive iga (?)). He reall doesn't have any symptoms. He is on the very thin side, but not sickly looking. He's had some moodiness and irratiability over the past six months, off and on.

The pediatric gi doc. confirmed that these are all signs and says he will have to go on a gluten-free diet, whether or not the biopsy is positive. She said she expects to find damage.

Here's my question: We are still paying off bills from medical testing I had last year and have a high deductable, which would mean we will end up pay over $1,500 for my sons biopsy. While I know that is not a super high amount in the grand scheme of his lifetime, there are other areas that need attention now (speech therapy for another child, educational testing for the celiac child,...you know, the list goes on and on). Of course there is also the small risks associated with the procedure, although I'm really not concerned that anything will go wrong.

The reason the doc gave for the biopsy is so that it will proove to my son he has it, and so that the biopsy (gold standard) will be part of his permanent record.

What to do??????? Any words of wisdom???

CMWeaver Apprentice

I have two daughters who were approaching age 4 when we were introduced to the entire gluten-free terminology. One of them WAS very sick. Her bloodwork was clearly positive and she did have the biopsy. Simply because the bloodwork was SO high they intended to find a lymphoma in her instestines. The other, who was not showing symptoms had the blood testing done. She too was positive. We chose not to have the biopsy done with her. We chose not to for a few reasons 1) I myself was having surgery for an unrelated matter and 2) going gluten-free was something we were going to do anyway since both were positive, I didn't feel I needed to have the biopsy paperwork on both of them.

If you feel that you will be eligible for the 7.5% medical tax deduction on medical expenses (visits, surgeries, price of gluten-free food compared to regular) the biopsy is confirmation that the diet and special food is a medical necessity and not something you "think" your child would need. However, at the age of 5 we have already gotten a hard time from my husband's insurance company. They bawked a bit at covering the one with the biopsy since there was a "pre-existing" condition. We had to have her GI write a letter stating that on the gluten-free diet, the condition would improve and pose no more than normal health related conditions as long as it was adhered to.

So, I suppose this is really what YOU prefer. No real right or wrong answer in my opinion. Whatever is best for your family.

Guest nini

I have a five year old with celiac and I have celiac... my numbers were extremely elevated but I did not have the biopsy AND STILL had a hard time getting and keeping health insurance because of the Celiac dx... My daughter did not have the biopsy either, but was dx'ed based on positive dietary response and genetic predisposition... I will not have the biopsy, and I will not put my daughter through it. We've improved so much on the gluten free diet that hopefully at this point any damage is all healed anyway.

In my opinion the biopsy is not necessary at all if the blood work was positive and regardless of results of the biopsy, you would have to put him on the diet anyway... don't do it. That's my opinion.

As far as this "gold standard" dx is concerned, the current thinking on this is that it is no longer the gold standard as the biopsy only shows the most advanced stages of Celiac... the bloodwork and dietary response would be more that enough to dx Celiac, and a Dr. that is still insisting on a biopsy, is operating on outdated information. (it's ok, most of them still are).

So, my input would be you do not need to put him through this. You KNOW he has is, just as I KNOW my daughter has it.

BTW she's been gluten free 2 1/2 years now and is doing amazingly well...

jadobson Newbie

Don't bx. We too had similar issues. I chose not to bx as we don't respond to anesthia very well. Within a few months he had gained some weight and I could easily see the difference. Our doctors agreed to label him with it without the dx based on the increase weight and dispostion. Go with your gut feeling. Mine was no bx was needed when all it would do was give us a label that didn't really matter to us, we were going gluten free either way.

Julie

TCA Contributor

We have excellent insurace and my son (just turned 3) has had 2 biopsies over the past 18 mos. Both were negative, but he had 2 very high antibodies, tooth enamel defects, failure to thrive, chronnic diarrhea, developmental delays, gas, etc. Even though the biopsies were negative, we decided to put him on a gluten-free diet as a trial and he is a different child. No diarrhea, he told me his tummy didn't hurt and he had never even told me it did (he probably didn't know any better), he has increased a clothing size and gained a pound for the first time in 9 mos. All this and we're in the 4th week of the diet. If I knew then what I do now, I would not have bothered with the biopsies. The diet has been the proof for us. If you try the diet unsuccessfully, you might want to do it then, but what's the use if you're going to do the diet anyway?

Electra375 Newbie

You want a firm medical dx for a 504 for school.

You want a firm medical dx for special services if you qualify otherwise

You want a firm medical dx to help with diet adherance in the teen years at 11 that is close. Teens come back notoriously negative on biopsy for some reason.

Dr. Fasano states that a non-compliant celiac disease through the teen years will develope type I diabetes by age 30. And as most of us know Type I diabetes is non-reversible and a life long necessity for insulin.

(We saw dr fasano last week and asked if there was a medical necessity for a biopsy -- his answer was getting teens to comply)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,981
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    jennifergodshalk
    Newest Member
    jennifergodshalk
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      It sounds like your gastroenterologist is becoming increasingly confident that celiac disease is the likely diagnosis based on both your older and newer lab results. Her suggestion to call each Monday for possible cancellations is actually a great strategy—especially given how long the wait is until your August 29th appointment. It’s also a good sign that she’s advocating for you to be seen sooner, which shows she’s taking your case seriously. The fact that some labs might not have been drawn yet due to overlap with your functional health doctor’s upcoming testing adds a layer of confusion, but that’s unfortunately common when multiple providers are involved. Hopefully, the GI’s...
    • cristiana
      Thanks for sharing that film, @trents.  I am not sure how I missed that film as I see it is a few years old, but it is very good.  I think you should be fine if you take your own packed lunch and eat it from your own lunchbox etc.  Might be worth doing a lunchtime recce to see how cramped the room is before making a decision - for all you know, there may be other people  there who don't eat gluten?
    • cameo674
      The GI doc messaged me this afternoon that she believes that the new blood work added to the old is definitely  looking like a celiac diagnosis is in my future.  She wants to me to call into scheduling each Monday to see if I can get my August 29th appointment moved up due to cancellations.  I have never had a doctor recommend that.  She also said there were additional labs that she requested still out that have not come back yet; so, they may have been missed drawing those since the functional health doctor has a whole slew of labs that I am suppose to be waiting until August 27th to do. I am still waiting to hear on whether or not she will allow me to do pill prep versus the typical...
    • Alibu
      Well, I've made if from the pre-diagnosis forum to here!  I've been diagnosed with "latent" or "potential" celiac and my doctor has suggested me to go gluten-free before my appointment with him in October (first available, LOL).  My ttg-iga was 152, my EMA was positive, I have the gene, but my biopsy was negative (and he took 12 samples), so it makes sense to go gluten free to see if I improve. I know the basics - I can find lists of things to avoid, I know about hidden dangers, etc. all of that.  Where I'm struggling is just STARTING.  I need to go shopping and stock up on some staples.  My goal is to not try to find gluten-free alternatives, but to focus on naturally gluten-free foods like...
    • Scott Adams
      It’s great that you were finally able to see a gastroenterologist—and even luckier to get in the same day as your referral! It sounds like your GI is taking a very thorough approach, which is reassuring given your complex symptoms and history. The confusion around your different tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody results is understandable. The variation between your December and June labs may be due to multiple factors, including differences in the lab performing the test (Quest vs. Mayo Clinic), the specific assay used, and the amount of gluten you had been consuming before each test. Antibody levels can drop significantly when gluten is reduced or eliminated from the...
×
×
  • Create New...