Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

More Blood Test Questions..


HeatherG

Recommended Posts

HeatherG Rookie

First, thank you all for being so patient with so many questions. I really appreciate it. I am working to get my daughter new blood tests since her only panel was done when she was less than 2 year old. At that point her only positive result was the IgG antibodies - her level was 89 - very high but since everything else was normal they said it was nothing.

So now I'm reading that yes IgG are more sensitive but not as specific. So my question is - what other things cause IgG antibodies to be through the roof like that? Are there other diseases? Does that just mean it's not as specific for celiac but guarantees a gluten intolerance?

Also, I read this on Dr. Fasano's website about testing in children under 2 (which she was at the time of the blood tests)

The isolated presence of anti-gliadin antibodies does not necessarily imply that the subject is affected by celiac disease, with the exception of children under the age 2 in which tTG and EMA may not be present.

so that makes it sound like IgG testing is specific enough when dealing with a baby. Is that what it sounds like to you? I actually live in the DC area so I called Fasano's office and they are having a nurse call me tomorrow to ask about this as well. I thought it better to talk to them before making an appointment in case I'm over-reacting here. They aren't exactly close - probably 2 hour drive - but I'm willing to make it if they think she might have celiac.

Thanks to everyone for your thoughts. I always feel better talking to doctors when I feel like I have some clue about what we are discussing - both so I can understand and so I can keep my guard up for the bs-o-meter. I'm starting to think I should have listened to that little voice back when the IgG levels meaning nothing seemed wrong to me.

Thanks

Heather


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,213
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Sassy620
    Newest Member
    Sassy620
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Fayeb23
      Thank you that’s really helpful, hopeful won’t have to have a biopsy.
    • RMJ
      That means the normal range (i.e. not celiac disease) would be a result less than 14.99.  Your result is WAY above that. Some gastroenterologists would diagnose that as celiac disease even without a confirming biopsy because it is more than ten times the top of the normal range.
    • Redanafs
      Hi everyone. Back in 2022 I had blood work drawn for iga ext gliadin. Since then I’ve developed worse stomach issues and all other health issues. My doctor just said cut out gluten. He did no further testing. Please see my test results attached. I just need some direction cause I feel so ill and the stomach pain is becoming worse. Can this test show indications for other gastrointestinal diseases?
    • Fayeb23
      Thank you. These were the results TTG ABS NUMERICAL: > 250.0 U/mL [< 14.99]  Really don’t understand the results!
    • Scott Adams
      Clearly from what you've said the info on Dailymed is much more up to date than the other site, which hasn't been updated since 2017. The fact that some companies might be repackaging drugs does not mean the info on the ingredients is not correct.
×
×
  • Create New...