Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

No Biopsy But Positive Blood Work For celiac disease


Kris Fisher

Recommended Posts

Kris Fisher Rookie

In April is was diagnosed as having celiac by a blood test. The Dr said I should then have a biopsy of my small intesting and then go on the celiac diet. I thought hey lets skip the biopsy and just go straight to the diet. Well now I'm wondering if I should have the biopsy to prove that I have celiac disease 100%. What are your thoughts. I have reflux which I had a surgery to correct and ever since I've has very painful bloating problems. Celiac seemed to be the answer but the other day my stomach blew up before I ate anything so that makes me wonder if it's celiac and maybe something else. Do you think having the biopsy 2 months later is going to show anything? I also have small blisters on my hands, which I've has since I can remember. Is this the rash related to Celiac. They are not itchy just very small lister bumps on my fingers and palms. They only bother me because I can see them.

My youngest Daughter was diagnosed with gastritis early last year so I thought being I'm a celiac maybe she has it. Gastritis is caused by alcohol, smoking and stress. She is 6 so she could have been misdiagnosed! I brought her in and my Dr said to keep her on prilosec for 3 months and see how it goes. Should I bring her in and demand the test or wait. I want to bring her back in but the Dr makes me feel like I'm crazy. I know Celiac is 100% so why wouldn't he want to rule her out?

By the way, this is a great website!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



flagbabyds Collaborator

Welcome

and I think that a blood test is a 100% procedure, and a lot less invasive, that proves that you have it, and you hould be on the diet. About the continuing stomach stuff, you need to make sure there is no cross contamination in your house, also look into all your beauty products, because those could make you sick.

I woudl say get your daughter tested ASAP because the earlier you do it, the less pain she will go through later in life.

~molly

Guest nini

If your blood test was positive, you absolutely have it and do not need to confirm it with a biopsy. I did not have the biopsy nor will I ever. My daughter's blood test was negative, but I put her on the diet and she has improved miraculously on the diet. She eats healthier than most kids her age, she doesn't like a lot of the junk food even if it's gluten-free... In my personal opinion, how you respond to the diet is the most valid diagnostic tool... Dr.s aren't going to tell you that because they don't make any money off of a diet!

My daughter had been diagnosed with reflux (GERD) and IBS as an infant... I definitely think those were mis diagnosis...

Kris Fisher Rookie

Thanks Nini, I will probably stay away from the biopsy, not because I'm a fraid of procedures but If the Dr didn't push it maybe I really don't need it. I'm feeling better now that I'm not eating so many vegy's. Those were making me feel horrible. Anyway, I will call and get my Daughter in and rule her out hopefully. My other two daughters don't seem to have any sypmtoms so I leave them be for now. I appreciate your help.

Kaycee Collaborator

Kris, I had a blood test, and it was positive. The doctor told me to keep going with the the gluten free diet, and that I would need a biopsy. His main reason for me to have the biopsy was to make sure that there was no other damage done through being coeliac. He wasn't too worried if that showed up nothing, as nothing would change his mind that I had coeliac. By the time I get my biopsy it might be a few months away, and he did not want me to continue eating gluten all that time.

I do want to have the biopsy done, as I am older, 49, and have only been diagnosed this year, and I am worried there could be a bit of damage. On top of that my father's family have a history of bowel cancer, so I know I will have to go that way too eventually. In New Zealand we can go through the public health system which takes a bit of time, but at least we don't have to pay. Otherwise if we have insurance, or can afford to pay, we can go private, and the biopsy would be done sooner.

So I am just waiting.

Cathy

gfp Enthusiast
If your blood test was positive, you absolutely have it and do not need to confirm it with a biopsy.

I absolutely agree ...moreoever if you are to have a biopsy you have to eat gluten while you wait ...

To me the usefulness of a biopsy is pretty limited diagnosis wise, even if its negative and you have a full celiac suite of +ve bloodtests you are not going to just keep eating gluten until you do get a positive biopsy!

However if the Dr. has a valid reason or you have a history of cancer in the family it might be something to put minds at rest or to have in a few years to check for damage but as a means to diagnose its pretty meaningless and a bad sampling or half and half results will just cast doubt on the diagnosis.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,901
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    tessycork47
    Newest Member
    tessycork47
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.