Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Testing Questions


wacky~jackie

Recommended Posts

wacky~jackie Rookie

Hi all! First I just want you to know that I have found this message board very informative.

Here's a short bio. Older sister diagnosed by positive blood tests and positive biopsy. She recommended that I be tested as I have many symptoms (bloating, joint pain, thyroid, depression, gall bladder, headaches - just to name a few!!). After much research I decided to ask my doctor to do blood tests. She really listened to what I had researched and my symptoms and ordered blood tests. After waiting almost 2 weeks for the results (which I didn't expect such a long wait.) they came back negative (IGG of 4 and IGA of 5, iron ok, B12 ok) but she only did those four tests.

My question is should I have her do further testing based on some of the posts I have read? Should I keep the appointment that I have scheduled with a GI and request a biopsy? Or do I just go gluten-free?

In the past I was on the Atkins diet and felt 100% better - which I now believe is because my gluten consumptions was definitely dramatically reduced (although probably not 100% gluten free). I'm ready to cut-out gluten completely to feel better but I don't want to do a gluten challenge for more tests so I just keep eating like I always have. I feel like I'm in limbo!!

Any suggestions?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



plantime Contributor

It is your choice what to do next. Your bloodwork was negative, but that could mean that there just is not enough damage to show up. You can still get the biopsy if you want to. You say you felt better on the Atkins diet, so I recommend you try the gluten-free diet for 6 weeks. A doctor's diagnosis is not needed to eat gluten-free, so if you feel better on a gluten-free diet, there is no reason why you can't remain on it. The dietary response is a test in and of itself.

AndreaB Contributor

If you can swing the money I would recommend Enterolab. They can catch the intolerance before it hits the blood as they test stool. Open Original Shared Link for more info.

mle-ii Explorer

I too noticed how much my symptoms improved when doing Atkins, I didn't make the link to gluten until I found out I had Lymphocytic Colitis and found that others with my disease had improvement with going gluten free. I had Enterolab test me and found that I had gluten sensitivity as well as the genes.

wacky~jackie Rookie
I too noticed how much my symptoms improved when doing Atkins, I didn't make the link to gluten until I found out I had Lymphocytic Colitis and found that others with my disease had improvement with going gluten free. I had Enterolab test me and found that I had gluten sensitivity as well as the genes.

It was amazing. I only ate when I was hungry. No more cravings. I had no bloating and my knees and back felt 100% better. I ended up going off it after some complications from my gall bladder removal and the hospital put me on a clear liquid diet (all sugar!!! which is a major no-no on Atkins) I tried to go back on it when I started gaining the weight back but I haven't had much success because it's too strict. At least on a gluten-free diet I can try corn, potatoes and rice and I can have fruit - none of that is allowed on Atkins. So I think I'll be able to stick to gluten-free pretty easily, especially if I feel better. I guess I was hoping for a definite positive diagnosis. I figured that I could stay away from the bread and stuff easier if I knew it would damage my intestine. I'm worried that I'll be more apt to cheat without the diagnosis. :(

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,201
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Judy Wysocki
    Newest Member
    Judy Wysocki
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
    • trents
      @JettaGirl, "Coeliac" is the British spelling of "celiac". Same disease. 
    • JettaGirl
      This may sound ridiculous but is this supposed to say Celiacs? I looked up Coeliacs because you never know, there’s a lot of diseases related to a disease that they come up with similar names for. It’s probably meant to say Celiacs but I just wanted to confirm.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.