Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What Does This Mean


eternity

Recommended Posts

eternity Explorer

My 17 month old was diagnosed with celiac about 2-3 weeks ago. My oldest three were tested and today they called and said that two of them were mildly positive. What the heck does that mean. One had a GLIABG level of 74 the other was 79. They are 6 and 9. The baby had results of 102. I don't know what these mean and why they are saying mildly positive. They said it is up to me whether I want them to be gluten-free based on whether or not they have symptoms. I thought if you were positive regardless of sypmtoms you were incurring intestinal damage. I am so stressed and confused, someone please help me out.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



tarnalberry Community Regular

Some docs think the diet is SOOO hard that, unless symptoms are interfering with your life, you shouldn't do the diet. I think that's poppycock (and I don't mean the popcorn based treat!), of course. I'd take the whole family gluten-free for the ease of it, but definitely those who test positive!

plantime Contributor

I agree with Tiffany. The diet is not as difficult as some people make it out to be. It would be even easier if your entire family is glutenfree. It is your decision to make.

celiac3270 Collaborator

Mildly positive....I think that means that they were borderline....probably positive, but not definite...mildly positive doesn't mean mild effects on the intestines. All three should be gluten-free.

Second, that is REALLY, REALLY stupid that they ask you based upon symptoms. They may not have symptoms now, but they're going to later. Arthritis, cancer, osteoporosis....if they don't follow the diet now, they'll die younger and will develop serious complications....all three should be gluten-free.

Sure, it would be easier for the entire family to be gluten-free, but it would also be expensive. If you have enough money to, I'd advise you to make the entire house gluten-free. However, gluten-free foods are really expensive, so if you're on a tighter budget, I would not advise you to put people on the diet if they don't need it -- I think this decision should be based on financial situation....over $4 for a loaf of bread is outrageous if you don't need it for medical purposes and it really adds up.

Finally, I, too, agree with Tiffany. The diet is not all that difficult to follow once you get the hang of it and symptoms should not affect your decision of gluten-free diet or not......if you catch it in them and make sure they follow the gluten-free diet, you're adding years to their life and saving them from miserable complications later in life. I find the symptoms the hard part...the diet isn't that bad or hard once you get the hang of it.

-celiac3270

tarnalberry Community Regular

I would add that a gluten-free diet doesn't have to be that much more expensive IF you stick with naturally gluten free foods. Instead of buying millet for a side dish, have beans. (And rice is always a good one.) Instead of buying fancy gluten-free noodles, get asian rice noodles (like pad thai noodles). Instead of buying bread, start making things that aren't sandwiches - or use corn tortillas. If you have to have baked goods, find a consensus on mixes that you can get and trust reasonably without having to throw away wasted efforts.

It doesn't have to be much more expensive to take the whole house gluten free if you're willing and able to get creative and cookin'! :-) (It can be cheaper if you're eating _really_ cheaply, but that's not particularly fun, as recall from my days in college trying to live on $20/wk for groceries. blah!)

gf4life Enthusiast

In my opinion, a positive is a positive. It doesn't matter if it is a higher or lower reading, some people just produce more antibodies than others and it has no bearings on how bad the symptoms are. There are people out there with outrageously high antibodies and NO symptoms, and other who have horrible symptoms and barely register any antibodies at all.

I found with my own kids that they all showed improvement on the gluten-free diet. Even the ones that tested borderline. My oldest child has a severe reaction to dairy, but his only symptoms from gluten seems to be behavior problems. Those were corrected with the diet and even his teacher noticed how much better he was behaving in class. My daughter mainly had diarrhea and occasionally vomiting. No more of that since being gluten-free. My younger boy has always been the sickest and he would have been the only one I had tested if the doctors had anything to say about it. He is so much better being gluten-free, and all of them have started growing at a faster rate.

Our pediatric GI doesn't think it is possible to keep a child 100% gluten free, but at home my kids are, and since I check ahead and send appropriate snacks whenever they go places, they are generally gluten-free away from home, too. The only time they have ever gotten gluten has been when we go out of town and have to eat out or at re4latives homes. The diet itself is not that hard, once you get used to it, but it is much easier if the whole house is gluten free. Before my kids were diagnosed I was getting contaminated all the time. Now the only things in the house that contain gluten are my husbands sauces and his jar of peanut butter (both kept out of reach of the kids) and an old toaster oven and one frozen loaf of regular bread, that kids and I don't touch. It had been easier than I thought, but it takes a lot of forethought when going out with the kids. The loss of convenience is the hardest thing to come to terms with.

And it doesn't have to be all that more expensive, you just have to be careful what you buy. I find we spend more on gluten-free foods, but since we eat out less, we end up spending about the same each month.

God bless,

Mariann

eternity Explorer

Just wanted to update and say that I found out that all three kids tested positive for the endomysial antibody. The lab said anything over 30 was moderate to high. My kids' levels were 74, 79, and 102. All three of them are gluten-free now and so am I since I am still nursing the youngest one. My dh I tested negative but I think he has a sensitivity. He is a truck driver and thus gone most of the time. That leaves my oldest son the only one not on a gluten-free diet in the house. He wants to be gluten-free as well to support his brothers. So long story short, we are all gluten-free. I don't buy many prepared gluten-free foods, I am pretty much making everything myself from scratch. It costs a bit to start with to accumulate the necessary ingredients, cooking supplies and such but I think it is cheaper in the long run than buying prepared gluten-free foods.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,898
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    MLucia
    Newest Member
    MLucia
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.