Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Celiac Disease Vs Gluten Sensitivity - Please Help!


cami

Recommended Posts

cami Rookie

After >10 yrs of health issues (mainly diarrhea, bloating, periodic weight loss, loss of energy, anemia, excema etc) which both I and my Dr thought were related to some GI-problem, I believe I have identified the cause... Dr thought IBS first, then some other food intolerance. About a year ago I started to suspect gluten. After removig it totaly from my diet I got SO much better. Called the Dr again, who was supportive and ordered test & a biopsy - went back on gluten for a couple of monthe (which was horrible). Tests came back borderline and the biopsy was clear, som my Dr said: "No celiac disese, but you may be sensitive to gluen anyway, so you might want to cut down..." But whenever I have pasta or bred it starts again. Not directly, but within a week or so. So, I called my Dr again and she said: "Actually there is no such thing as gluten sensitivity... There is celiac disease, which you don't have..." Please help me out:

1) Is it scientifically proven thet non-celiac gluten sensitivity really exists?

2) If yes, can I eat pasta etc every now and then or do I need t be as strict as someone with celiac disease?

I would really appreciate your opinions on this!!!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Jestgar Rising Star

I think you already know the answer to this. Gluten makes you sick. You can't eat it. Your doctor can only say that there was no evidence of destruction to your villi on the pieces that they took. There is no way to know what's going on in the rest of your intestine. Also, even if you aren't destroying your intestine, gluten makes you sick. You can't eat it.

tarnalberry Community Regular

Well, there's no scientific definition of non-celiac gluten-sensitivity. So technically, there can't be "proof".

There is, however, scientific evidence of villious atrophy concordant with celiac disease that resolves on a gluten free diet in the absence of the celiac genes. There is scientific evidence of varying levels of villious atrophy. There is scientific evidence of false negatives for both the blood test (varying reasons, including insufficient damage to the intestines and high references ranges in some labs) and the biopsy (again, varying reasons, including varying levels of damaged required to be categorized as damage and the chance of missing patchy damage by only taking a few spots to biopsy). And, there is scientific evidence that YOUR BODY does not like - at the least - wheat containing items. (The dietary challenge is a VALID DIAGNOSTIC TOOL.)

The problem with the label "celiac disease" is that some doctors are *very* literal. The classic diagnosis requires specific levels of damage to sufficient amounts of the intestines. Kinda like asking "are you bald?" to someone in the middle of balding. There isn't room in the literal definition for "gluten damages me, but not bad enough to pass your test, yet".

You know you don't do well with wheat - so listen to your body and get rid of it from your diet. Whether it's more than just wheat... well, you haven't talked about reacting to other gluten sources, so my suggestion would be to test them. That runs you the risk of making you feel crappy again, so it's a very personal decision.

Chicklet Rookie

I have this book ~ Open Original Shared Link and the author makes a case for gluten sensitivity before celiac. It's a good book you might want to see if your library has it or you might want to buy it.

Sensitive or celiac a gluten free diet is a must.

Nancym Enthusiast

Isn't it amazing how our bodies can speak to us so clearly, so compellingly, yet we don't trust them as much as some doctor who spend 11 minutes in medical school on the subject celiac disease, 20 years ago. :P

cami Rookie

Hi everyone,

thank you so much for you replies. Point taken - I should trust my body! I just need to know... Sure, I feel crappy if I eat pasta for a couple of days, but, is it dangerous.. I mean, REALLY dangerous. I'm thinking of the kind of illnesses that I read are connected to celiac disease: cancer, arthrithis etc...??

Jestgar Rising Star
Hi everyone,

thank you so much for you replies. Point taken - I should trust my body! I just need to know... Sure, I feel crappy if I eat pasta for a couple of days, but, is it dangerous.. I mean, REALLY dangerous. I'm thinking of the kind of illnesses that I read are connected to celiac disease: cancer, arthrithis etc...??

The only way you'll ever really know is by getting one of these. Is it worth it?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,699
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kiran dd
    Newest Member
    Kiran dd
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Grahamsnaturalworld
      Where can I find a gastro in adelaide who can diagnose refractory celiac disease have seen 3 so far and don't understand the most obvious question, why my celiac symptoms did not resolve on a gluten free diet the symptoms just got worse as it is attacking my nervous system. 
    • ShariW
      I recently traveled to Spain and Portugal. I was with a tour group, they knew I needed to be gluten-free and made sure the kitchens preparing the group meals were aware. But just in case, I took Gliadin-X with me and took it for every evening meal - and most other meals. The one time I got glutened was from lunch early in the trip - had to be from cross-contamination. I had not taken Gliadin-X before that meal, which made for a pretty miserable day. Learned my lesson... 😞 
    • Hummer01
      Hi trents, thanks for the response.  The 2nd opinion doctor said that if my CRP is still elevated at that time, he would advise me to look at Crohns/UC or another autoimmune issue. The colonoscopy I had this year seemed to rule those 2 out for now so he still believed celiac may explain it. No previous doctors have suggested any explanation for it even after calling to tell me it was a concerning result.  I guess it feels tough knowing I have positive blood testing, permissive genetics, and visible duodenum changes... and somehow it's NCGS instead of celiac. I'm still surprised the biopsies came back negative when the doctor was so sure they would be positive.
    • trents
      "He also said that my CRP should return to a normal level at this time if the culprit was inflammation in the small intestine due to celiac." But with if the elevated CRP levels are caused by some other inflammatory process going on in your body? "She also said that my positive EMA isn't valuable because it has "a high false positive rate." Totally wrong! This is a highly accurate test for celiac disease, that requires specialized expertise to perform and interpret, and it is more expensive than other blood tests. It is generally used as a last test to confirm celiac disease after a positive tTG-IgA test. The sensitivity of a test refers to its ability to correctly identify individuals with the condition. For the EMA-IgA blood test, the sensitivity is generally very high, ranging from 90% to 98%. This means that the test can accurately detect celiac disease in a significant percentage of people who have the condition. The specificity of a test refers to its ability to correctly identify individuals without the condition. For the EMA-IgA blood test, the specificity is also high, typically around 95% to 100%. This indicates that the test can effectively rule out celiac disease in individuals who do not have the condition. Taken from the following article: Looking at the whole picture, I am wondering if you are transitioning from NCGS to celiac disease. Some experts in the gluten disorder field believe NCGS can be a precursor to celiac disease.
    • Hummer01
      Hi all, just wanted to post an update.  I have been gluten free for about 1.5 months now and seeing improvement already in the bathroom.  Recently I had a visit with another GI doctor for a 2nd opinion. He said that while my blood tests and scope are not a "slam dunk" for celiac, he believes it's more likely than not that I have it. His advice was to stay with a celiac-level gluten free diet (no CC) for 6-12 months then retest to make sure TTG-IGA is still negative. He also said that my CRP should return to a normal level at this time if the culprit was inflammation in the small intestine due to celiac.  Today I had a follow up with the original GI that performed the scope. She is confident it is NCGS and says I can still have gluten sometimes. When I asked about the visible duodenum damage, she said it is just "irritation" from gluten because the biopsies were negative. She also said that my positive EMA isn't valuable because it has "a high false positive rate."  I guess I'm having trouble reconciling the totally different advice from these 2 GI's. I want to believe the new doctor more at this point because what he said just makes more sense to me, and he gave an actionable timeline for possible next steps. Feeling lost and disappointed at this point and wanted to write it down here in case anyone has input. Thank you.   
×
×
  • Create New...