Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is A Follow-up Endoscopy Needed 6 Months After Initial Diagnosis?


mellamella

Recommended Posts

mellamella Newbie

I was diagnosed in Aug '07. I am feeling and doing well living gluten free. Last week I had a 6 month follow-up with myGI guy. Blood work was repeated and all came-back normal. He has scheduled me for another upper endoscopy. I think this is really not necessary. He is a major doctor in a major city and explained to me that this is his protocal for definative diagnosis. I would love to hear who else has had a repeat upper endoscopy, and what exactly was the time frame for doing so? Thanks for your input!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



johnsoniu Apprentice
I was diagnosed in Aug '07. I am feeling and doing well living gluten free. Last week I had a 6 month follow-up with myGI guy. Blood work was repeated and all came-back normal. He has scheduled me for another upper endoscopy. I think this is really not necessary. He is a major doctor in a major city and explained to me that this is his protocal for definative diagnosis. I would love to hear who else has had a repeat upper endoscopy, and what exactly was the time frame for doing so? Thanks for your input!

I was just dx'd last month and had my follow up consult and blood work last Thursday.

He said everything looked good on the blood work, asked how the stools were, and said he'd see me in 6 months. Said he might take another endoscopy in a year or so, but it would depend on how I was feeling then.

I would think if your original scope showed a lot of damage( I had a lot), he may want to look to see how things were progressing, but if you're feeling well it kinda seems redundant. Better safe than sorry I guess. Or he just might be using you as a guinea pig to source in his next research paper. For which you'll receive no royalties B)

psawyer Proficient

I had both an endoscopy and a colonoscopy in June of 2000. My colon was normal, but the small intestine showed severe damage to the villi.

Since it has been seven years, and I am over 50, my primary care physician believes that a colonoscopy every seven to ten years is indicated. Since the preparation overlaps and the extra effort is small, she also wants another endoscopy to see if my villi have completely healed (an indication of just how gluten-free I have really been).

The double procedure is scheduled for July 10. The actual procedure is not a big deal, but the purging of the digestive tract in preparation is a royal pain in the @$$. For a diabetic (like me), there are extra challenges as you try to manage blood sugar and insulin levels during the final 24 hours.

Six months seems, to me, a bit soon. Depending on how long you went without a diagnosis (while eating gluten) and your age when you went gluten-free, it may take longer that to heal the villi. But if your blood work is now negative, that is a strong sign that the gluten-free diet is working and the villi should be on the road to recovery.

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

What will he do if your villi have or have not improved? It's not like you can go MORE gluten-free!

If the outcome is not going to change by having an invasive procedure, why have it?

pinky Apprentice

my doctor had me do a follow-up endoscopy after 1 year to see if the gluten-free diet was working. then blood work also every year, but only the one endoscopy.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,875
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kelly Bates
    Newest Member
    Kelly Bates
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • RMJ
      I had an endoscopy where there was no visible damage but biopsies showed damage. I even asked beforehand if the endoscope had good enough magnification to see the villi!  I hope you get a clear answer from the biopsies.
    • terrymouse
      I have an endoscopy booked for mid-September to test for Celiac. My gp seems convinced it is celiac and I should eliminate gluten right away, but the gastroenterologist I was referred to says if I'm totally gluten-free then they won't be able to detect celiac from the endoscopy, and I should load up on gluten 2 weeks before the test. So I guess I shouldn't eliminate gluten then? Or stop and start again closer to the appointment date. But I'm also on the wait list in case they can get me in sooner, because I'm losing weight. I don't want to have to go back and do it over again if I can help it. They also were unsure if there isn't something else wrong with my stomach, so that's a possibility. I don't have the details but from what I understood my blood tests results were positive but on the low end. So I'm getting mixed up here, do I go gluten-free or not? Would 2.5 months of being gluten-free make any noticable difference? 
    • knitty kitty
      Being low in B12, Folate B9, ferritin, zinc and copper sounds consistent with anemia which can often occur with Celiac.  What did your doctor recommend? What about your Vitamin D?  It helps regulate the immune system.  
    • ehb
      @knitty kitty thank you I am exploring these options, I really appreciate all the suggestions and info. I am only slightly below the normal range for folate, zinc and copper. And in the low end of the normal range for B12, ferritin, and vitamin A. I’m good for carotene magnesium and iron, but I’ve been taking 400 mg magnesium daily 
    • Alibu
      I just had my endoscopy the other day and the doctor took 12 samples because he said if we're going to find something we're going to find it today LOL. But when he got down there, he said everything looked good. So I have it in my head again that it's going to be negative because everyone I've heard of who had a positive biopsy had their endoscopies where the doctor was like yep, I can see the damage. My tissues all look great apparently. So if they come back negative, I'm not sure where to go from here. Could it still be a non-celiac gluten sensitivity even with my blood work? I thought NCGS didn't show up on blood tests. Is it possible that the biopsy still comes back positive even if everything looked healthy on endoscope? I had it done at a big hospital in the state, so I would think they'd have the kind of equipment where they'd be able to see it well. I even have pictures in my report and they don't seem to have the damage that others have seen.
×
×
  • Create New...