Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Please Help Me Choose Endoscopy Or No Endoscopy For My Son.

momof6

Recommended Posts

momof6 Newbie
momof6
Posted

My son, age 6, has had digestive issues for a long time. He has belly pain/bloating after meals; actually it begins before the meal is half over. The worst of his pain seems to be in the area just below his stomach, around his navel. He also has cramps in his left side. He has bouts of constipation/diarrhea, and has had gastric reflux for several years. Currently he takes previcid daily for reflux. He also has tooth enamel issues, and has just begun sleeping through the night.

He has been doing better, so much so that we hoped he was "over" whatever was bothering him, but in the last couple of weeks his symptoms have come back with a vengence. The pediatric gastro doctor ran many tests on him, but can't pinpoint a cause. She feels he should have endoscopy/biopsy to determine if this is celiac.

Reading what I've typed out makes it seem so much clearer to me. I think we do need to try to pinpoint the cause. Endoscopy/biopsy would be the next logical step, wouldn't it? He has had multiple bloodtests, upper G.I., allergy tests, and tests to rule out parasites and infections. I'm not sure of the "numbers" on his bloodwork, but the gastro doctor said there were no "red flags"; however, she hasn't ruled out celiac.

What do you all think?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


sherylj Rookie
sherylj
Posted

My son, age 6, has had digestive issues for a long time. He has belly pain/bloating after meals; actually it begins before the meal is half over. The worst of his pain seems to be in the area just below his stomach, around his navel. He also has cramps in his left side. He has bouts of constipation/diarrhea, and has had gastric reflux for several years. Currently he takes previcid daily for reflux. He also has tooth enamel issues, and has just begun sleeping through the night.

He has been doing better, so much so that we hoped he was "over" whatever was bothering him, but in the last couple of weeks his symptoms have come back with a vengence. The pediatric gastro doctor ran many tests on him, but can't pinpoint a cause. She feels he should have endoscopy/biopsy to determine if this is celiac.

Reading what I've typed out makes it seem so much clearer to me. I think we do need to try to pinpoint the cause. Endoscopy/biopsy would be the next logical step, wouldn't it? He has had multiple bloodtests, upper G.I., allergy tests, and tests to rule out parasites and infections. I'm not sure of the "numbers" on his bloodwork, but the gastro doctor said there were no "red flags"; however, she hasn't ruled out celiac.

What do you all think?/quote]

YES, I would follow your dr. suggestion for the biopsy. And I think you are fortunate to have a dr. who is covering all the bases. Sherylj

psawyer Proficient
psawyer
Posted

Based on what you say, my inclination would be to say yes to the endoscopy. I don't know exactly what blood tests were done. A positive biopsy is a definitive diagnosis of celiac, regardless of what the blood tests may say. As I recall, the blood tests are less accurate in young children. Also, the endoscopy is not restricted to celiac disease, and may reveal some other condition which is causing gastric symptoms.

Prior to my diagnosis, I had multiple severe digestive symptoms. Often I would feel hungry, but after eating just a few mouthfuls of food, I would develop cramps and nausea, throwing up within minutes of eating.

TMI warning: The worst of all would be experiencing the cramps after eating while sitting on the throne with severe diarrhea and simultaneously vomiting into the bucket I was holding. Yucch. Both ends at once! A unique celiac experience. :angry:

The endoscopy/biopsy could answer many questions. I would choose to do it.

Ursa Major Collaborator
Ursa Major
Posted

I agree that the endoscopy would be a good idea. Just beware that even the biopsy isn't that accurate and yields false negatives. The intestines have a very large surface area, and the biopsies aren't necessarily taken from the damaged areas. Therefore, if you get a positive biopsy, it is celiac disease, but if the biopsy comes back negative, it could still be celiac disease.

No matter what, you definitely should try your son on the gluten-free diet after the biopsy is done, regardless of what the results show. Because the diet trial is still the best test of them all.

tarnalberry Community Regular
tarnalberry
Posted

Given that everything else has been negative or inconclusive, I think that continuing to look is better than doing nothing, and this sounds like the next step, unpleasant though it may be. Good luck!

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular
Fiddle-Faddle
Posted

JUst out of curiosity, why doesn't anybody think that a trial of the gluten-free diet might be a better indicator and safer course than an endoscopy? There ARE risks to the endoscopy because of the anesthesia, and there are false negatives. What if the endo results are negative? Does that mean you wouldn't try the diet? What will an endoscopy do that a diet trial won't?

Seems to me the diet is the first place to start...

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted
JUst out of curiosity, why doesn't anybody think that a trial of the gluten-free diet might be a better indicator and safer course than an endoscopy? There ARE risks to the endoscopy because of the anesthesia, and there are false negatives. What if the endo results are negative? Does that mean you wouldn't try the diet? What will an endoscopy do that a diet trial won't?

Seems to me the diet is the first place to start...

I agree with this whole heartedly, the risk of a false negative or hearing, 'well there are changes but we can't really say he's celiac till more damage is present' and ending up back at square one are there.

Dietary response is diagnostic, have you tried the diet strictly with him for a bit? That would be the way I would go.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Ursa Major Collaborator
Ursa Major
Posted
JUst out of curiosity, why doesn't anybody think that a trial of the gluten-free diet might be a better indicator and safer course than an endoscopy? There ARE risks to the endoscopy because of the anesthesia, and there are false negatives. What if the endo results are negative? Does that mean you wouldn't try the diet? What will an endoscopy do that a diet trial won't?

Seems to me the diet is the first place to start...

Well, the reason why I said that the endoscopy is a good idea is, that the boy is still eating gluten. A lot of people will put a child back on gluten if the doctor says he wants to do an endoscopy after all, because they want to 'really know'. And that is more cruel than keeping him on gluten now (before he knows how good he might feel off it), do a biopsy and then doing the diet trial.

Nancym Enthusiast
Nancym
Posted

I think a firm diagnosis is the best of all worlds then neither parent nor child can ever rationalize them eating wheat as "it's just gluten sensitivity not celiac" -- which I think is what a lot of people end up doing.

happygirl Collaborator
happygirl
Posted

An endoscopy can look for other things (i.e., this might not be entirely/or at all Celiac). A gluten free diet won't help much if he doesn't have a problem with gluten, and has other problems.

CMCM Rising Star
CMCM
Posted

:lol: :lol: I've had this very unique experience as well. Lovely, isn't it!

TMI warning: The worst of all would be experiencing the cramps after eating while sitting on the throne with severe diarrhea and simultaneously vomiting into the bucket I was holding. Yucch. Both ends at once! A unique celiac experience. :angry:

jerseyangel Proficient
jerseyangel
Posted
:lol: :lol: I've had this very unique experience as well. Lovely, isn't it!

TMI warning: The worst of all would be experiencing the cramps after eating while sitting on the throne with severe diarrhea and simultaneously vomiting into the bucket I was holding. Yucch. Both ends at once! A unique celiac experience. :angry:

Me too :(

Dreadful....

2Boys4Me Enthusiast
2Boys4Me
Posted

Ty's blood test was overwhelmingly positive.

The doctors pretty much said they only wanted to do the endoscopy to see what was there, but they were sure they were looking at celiac because of the blood tests.

He had the endoscopy when he was 5yrs 9months old.

They did find damage: some villi normal, some with severe villous atrophy "consistent with celiac disease".

e&j0304 Enthusiast
e&j0304
Posted
JUst out of curiosity, why doesn't anybody think that a trial of the gluten-free diet might be a better indicator and safer course than an endoscopy? There ARE risks to the endoscopy because of the anesthesia, and there are false negatives. What if the endo results are negative? Does that mean you wouldn't try the diet? What will an endoscopy do that a diet trial won't?

Seems to me the diet is the first place to start...

I think that the benefits to finding out the information during an endoscopy FAR outweigh any potential risks. Most people do completely fine with the anesthesia and if you have a good dr. they should be able to find the damage. If that is all negative then I would absoloutely do a trial of the diet. I agree with Ursula that it only makes sense to try to get the diagnosis first and then try the diet so the parent and child aren't left with the "Well maybe we should have done it...." thoughts. It is not at all easy to put a sick child back on gluten just for a challenge. Also, there are other conditions other than celiac that could be affecting that child. He deserves to have every possible chance of receiving a diagnosis if it's something he will have to deal with for the rest of his life...

JMHO

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to MicG's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      4

      Test interpretations

      Based on those results alone, it’s not possible to say you have celiac disease. The test that is usually most specific for celiac, tTG-IgA, is negative in your results, and the endomysial antibody (EMA) is also negative, which generally argues against active celiac disease. However, your deamidated gliadin IgA is elevated, and your total IgA level is also h...
    2. trents
      - trents replied to MicG's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      4

      Test interpretations

      Since you compromised the validity of the antibody testing by experimenting with gluten withdrawal ahead of the testing, you are faced with two options: 1. Reintroduce significant amounts of gluten into your diet for a period of weeks, i.e., undertake a "gluten challenge". The most recent guidelines are the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten...
    3. suek54
      - suek54 replied to Kayla S's topic in Dermatitis Herpetiformis
      4

      Need advice for some relief!

      Hi Kayla Huge sympathies. I was diagnosed in December, after 8 months of the most awful rash, literally top to toe. Mine is a work in progress. Im on just 50mg dapsone at the moment but probably need an increased dose to properly put the lid on it. As you have been now glutened, I wondered whether it might be worth asking for a skin biopsy to finally...
    4. Scott Adams
      0

      Do Air Filters, Vent Hoods, and HEPA Vacuums Reduce Home Gluten Exposure?

    5. MicG
      - MicG replied to MicG's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      4

      Test interpretations

      I had been eating reduced gluten until about 3 days before the test. I did realize that wasn’t ideal, but it was experimental to see if gluten was actually bothering me. One slip up with soy sauce and it was quite clear to me that it was, lol.
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,655
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Coop12
    Newest Member
    Coop12
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Test interpretations

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Based on those results alone, it’s not possible to say you have celiac disease. The test that is usually most specific for celiac, tTG-IgA, is negative in your results, and the endomysial antibody (EMA) is also negative, which generally argues against active celiac disease. However, your deamidated gliadin IgA is elevated, and your total IgA level is also high, which can sometimes affect how the other antibody tests behave. Another important factor is that you were reducing gluten before the test, which can lower antibody levels and make the results less reliable. Because of that, many doctors recommend a gluten challenge (eating gluten regularly for several weeks) before repeating blood tests or considering an endoscopy if symptoms and labs raise concern. It would be best to review these results with a gastroenterologist, who can interpret them in context and decide whether further testing is needed.
    • trents
      Test interpretations

      By trents · Posted

      Since you compromised the validity of the antibody testing by experimenting with gluten withdrawal ahead of the testing, you are faced with two options: 1. Reintroduce significant amounts of gluten into your diet for a period of weeks, i.e., undertake a "gluten challenge". The most recent guidelines are the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten (about the amount found in 4-6 slices of wheat-based bread) for at least two weeks leading up to the day of testing. Note: I would certainly give it more than two weeks to be sure. 2. Be willing to live with the ambiguity of not knowing whether gluten causes you problems because you have celiac disease or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). There is no test for NCGS. Celiac disease must first be ruled out and we have tests for it. Celiac disease has an autoimmune base. NCGS does not. GI symptoms overlap. In the early stages of celiac disease, other body systems may not be showing stress or damage so, symptomatically, it would be difficult to distinguish between celiac disease and NCGS. Both conditions require elimination of gluten from the diet for symptom relief. Some experts feel that NCGS can be a precursor to celiac disease.
    • suek54
      Need advice for some relief!

      By suek54 · Posted

      Hi Kayla Huge sympathies. I was diagnosed in December, after 8 months of the most awful rash, literally top to toe. Mine is a work in progress. Im on just 50mg dapsone at the moment but probably need an increased dose to properly put the lid on it. As you have been now glutened, I wondered whether it might be worth asking for a skin biopsy to finally get a proper diagnosis? Sue  
    • MicG
      Test interpretations

      By MicG · Posted

      I had been eating reduced gluten until about 3 days before the test. I did realize that wasn’t ideal, but it was experimental to see if gluten was actually bothering me. One slip up with soy sauce and it was quite clear to me that it was, lol. 
    • trents
      Test interpretations

      By trents · Posted

      Possibly. Your total IGA (Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum) is actually high so you are not IGA deficient. In the absence of IGA deficiency, the most reliable celiac antibody test would be the t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA for which your score is within normal range. There are other things besides celiac disease that might cause an elevated DGP-IGA (Deamidated Gliadin Abs, lgA) for which you do have a positive score. It might also be of concern that your total IGA is elevated as that can indicate some other health problems, some of which are serious.  Had you been practicing a gluten free or a reduced gluten free diet prior to the blood draw? Talk to your physician about these things. I would also seek an endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel to check for damage to the villous lining, which is the gold standard diagnostic test for celiac disease.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.