Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blunted Villi No Big Deal


nate78

Recommended Posts

nate78 Rookie

My biopsy report said blunted villi. My doctor said I do not have Celiac blood test was neg. Is blunted villi no big deal.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



rumbles Newbie

You might want to ask for a more thorough definition, and a second opinion. If it's anything other than a normal state or condition, it has a cause. It could be nothing, or it could be something that needs to be researched, defined and corrected, - you owe it to yourself to find out exactly what the doctor meant, and to verify the finding through a second opinion. If it's nothing, no harm done and you have peace of mind, - if it's something, than you're finding and taking steps to improve your health before the situation possibly gets out of control.

Pat

Gentleheart Enthusiast
My biopsy report said blunted villi. My doctor said I do not have Celiac blood test was neg. Is blunted villi no big deal.

I'm confused by what your doctor said. Blunted villi may be common like he says, but it certainly IS a big deal. Like Ursa Major said in another post, blunted villi means you are not assimilating nutrients. That's certainly life altering.

What are all of these other supposed things that can cause blunted villi? Why doesn't he think it's merely celiac, which in your case seems to be the obvious conclusion from your childhood diagnosis? And besides, isn't he ultimately concerned as to WHY your villi are blunted. Is he content to let them stay that way just because you feel OK?

It's interesting to me that your doctor seems to be diagnosing you backwards. Most doctors take a blood test first. Be it negative or be it positive, they frequently then use the biopsy to confirm their diagnosis. This doctor seems to be giving the frequently fallible blood test credence over the biopsy. Weird.

I'd think long and hard before you plunge back into the gluten world. I'd take my tests to another physician knowledgeable about 21st century celiac and get a second opinion. Have you thought about using the enterolab tests? Sometimes they can fill in the missing puzzle pieces.

rumbles Newbie

. . . as for the negative blood test, - that is not definitive. Blood tests are not 100 percent accurate. There are many of us here that tested negative on blood work and positive on biopsy.

Are you gluten free? - If so, has that reduced or alleviated symptoms? If you are having symptoms, and going gluten free gets rid of the symptoms, for many of us, that's really the answer. If you are not gluten free, and the doctor has completed all of the tests that they plan on, - you might want to consider going gluten free for two-to-three weeks and seeing if you notice a difference.

Best of luck, and best of health!

ravenwoodglass Mentor

So now they are saying even the 'Gold Standard" isn't enough. Boy they sure don't want to lose the money they get from our visits and tests. Many of us do not show up in blood work. Your villi have been damaged and you need to get two things, another doctor and a gluten free and dairy (at first) diet.

ianm Apprentice

Your doctor is an idiot, find another one.

CMCM Rising Star

Big SIGH :(:(:(:( Does the ignorance ever go away? Do they ever really figure it out (doctors)???


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Roses8721 replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      9

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    2. - Ginger38 replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      6

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Silk tha Shocker's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Help

    4. - Silk tha Shocker posted a topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Help

    5. - trents replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      9

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,478
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Susan Gutenberger
    Newest Member
    Susan Gutenberger
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Roses8721
      Yes, i pulled raw ancetry data and saw i have 2/3 markers for DQ2.2 but have heard from friends in genetics that this raw data can be wildly innacurate
    • Ginger38
      Thanks, I’m still dealing with the pain and tingling and itching and feeling like bugs or something crawling around on my face and scalp. It’s been a miserable experience. I saw my eye doc last week, the eye itself was okay, so they didn’t do anything. I did take a 7 day course of an antiviral. I’m hoping for a turnaround soon! My life is full of stress but I have been on / off the gluten free diet for the last year , after being talked into going back on gluten to have a biopsy, that looked okay. But I do have positive antibody levels that have been responsive  to a gluten free diet. I can’t help but wonder if the last year has caused all this. 
    • Scott Adams
      I don't think any apps are up to date, which is exactly why this happened to you. Most of the data in such apps is years old, and it doesn't get updated in real time. Ultimately there is no substitution for learning to read labels. The following two lists are very helpful for anyone who is gluten sensitive and needs to avoid gluten when shopping. It's very important to learn to read labels and understand sources of hidden gluten, and to know some general information about product labelling--for example in the USA if wheat is a possible allergen it must be declared on a product's ingredient label like this: Allergens: Wheat.      
    • Silk tha Shocker
      What is the best gluten free scanner app? I have the "gluten-free Scanner" app. I scanned an almond joy and it says it contains gluten when the package is labeled gluten free
    • trents
      Certainly, it would b wise to have a gene test done if your physician is open to it as it would provide some more data to understand what's going on. But keep in mind that the genetic test for celiac disease cannot be used as to diagnose celiac disease, only to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population possess one or both of the primary genes known to be associated with the development of active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develop active celiac disease. So, the gene test is an effective "rule out" tool but not an effective diagnostic tool.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.