Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Dusting Flour Substitute Recommendation


jerseygrl

Recommended Posts

jerseygrl Explorer

I am making my specialty dish for the first time since the girls have been gluten-free. Its Cog Au Vin (chicken in wine sauce)

Now, I usually dust the chicken in flour first. I think I am still going to do that, just switch the flour.

The first step is to dust the chicken with flour and then brown in butter.

Any recommendations? In my pantry is:

Potato flour

Rice Flour

Tapioca Flour

Basic Baking Mix

Would one of these be better than the other, or are there other recommendations?

Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



jerseygrl Explorer

Cog = Coq *silly desenders*

jodiegirl Newbie

I usually use corn starch with good results, just don't use too much or you will have a mess on your hands. The end result is similar to using wheat flour, but taste is a little different. I want to fry chicken coated in Arrowroot starch/powder one of these days, but I have been too chicken to try it..... Arrowroot is the best thickener for soups and gravys, even better than wheat flour. Good luck.

jerseygrl Explorer
I usually use corn starch with good results, just don't use too much or you will have a mess on your hands. The end result is similar to using wheat flour, but taste is a little different.

I'll be using salt and pepper to when dusting. Do you think corn starch will taste significantly different, or just slightly?

wolfie Enthusiast

I would use the baking mix or corn flour, if you have it.

I used Zatarain's fish fri for some fish and it is just corn flour....it turns out very nicely. We have used baking mix (Pamela's) for dusting chicken before.

Good luck! :)

hangininthere Apprentice

I make fried chicken and fish with brown rice flour, and I can't tell any difference in taste or consistency from regular wheat flour. Fries up nice just as wheat flour does.

Best wishes to all!

jodiegirl Newbie
I'll be using salt and pepper to when dusting. Do you think corn starch will taste significantly different, or just slightly?

If it is just dusting, not a total drench, I think if you notice any difference in taste it would be slight. I think most Chinese restaurants use corn starch when frying chicken, that is the taste difference I am talking about. I guess I would describe the difference as it being more of an onion ring batter breading taste (minus the onion) than regular flour fried chicken taste. I have found that it still gets crispy, but it will not brown as much as regular flour, but it will brown. I think as long as there are other flavors working in the dish (like a good flavorful sauce), the corn starch will not drasticially change anything as it is a mild flavor to begin with. I have found that the other gluten-free flours/starches add a funny taste, I have yet to find a good combination of flours for frying, then again I am just too darn picky. Jodie


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



TinkerbellSwt Collaborator

For any dusting like that, unless it states use rice flour, I use baking mix. When I am subbing for a regular recipe its always baking mix..

kbabe1968 Enthusiast

I'd use rice flour or corn starch.

The only reason I'd suggest rice flour over corn starch is that rice flour has a higher temperature tolerance than corn starch. Basically, corn starch can be heated past it's thickening point and be rendered useless, whereas rice flour will act more like wheat flour.

:) Make sure to post the recipe when you're done :D

jerseygrl Explorer

Thanks all. I think I will use the Baking Mix.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,209
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    gingerkane77
    Newest Member
    gingerkane77
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.