Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood Test Results?


vany4

Recommended Posts

vany4 Newbie

Hi. I just got blood test results back, and my Dr. wants me to get an other opinion because he says he can not interpret these results. What do these mean?

AGA - IgA = 3 (negative)

AGA - IgG = 7 (negative)

ERA t-Transglutamine IgA = 3 (negative)

Reticulin IgA Ab - negative (neg: <120)

Reticulin IgG Ab = 1.80 HIGH (neg: <120)

The report says that IGg class retuculin antibodies are not specific for celiac nd occur in 20% of patients with active disease.

Help!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GEF Explorer

I wish I knew... if it weren't for the Antireticulin (abbrev. ARA), I'd say you were negative. But, more importantly is what type of symptoms are you having and are you currently on a gluten-free diet?

Gretchen

tarnalberry Community Regular

I also only had a positive anti-reticulin score, so my doc suggested sticking with the diet for a while and then trying a gluten challenge, which gave very positive results. It is not very sensitive (lots of people will not test positive to this test even if they are gluten intolerant), but is very specific, in theory.

vany4 Newbie

I have symptoms, mostly bone and joint pain, and have IBS (or so they thought), and bloating, etc. I started a gluten free diet 2 days before the test, and have begun to feel better (it's been over a week now).

I don't understand the difference between sensitive and specific. Does it mean it's specific for celiac, but even people without it test positive?

vany4 Newbie

I have symptoms, mostly bone and joint pain, and have IBS (or so they thought), and bloating, etc. I started a gluten free diet 2 days before the test, and have begun to feel better (it's been over a week now).

I don't understand the difference between sensitive and specific. Does it mean it's specific for celiac, but even people without it test positive?

tarnalberry Community Regular

for lab tests - sensitivity means how often the tests report a postive for someone who really does have the condition. specfic means how many other things a positive test could mean. for instance, a simple iron test is (as I recall) pretty darn sensitive, but not specific for celiac since a lot of things can lead to anemia.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Scott Adams's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      46

      Supplements for those Diagnosed with Celiac Disease

    2. - trents replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Is it gluten?

    3. - RMJ replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      3

      nothing has changed

    4. - asaT replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      3

      nothing has changed

    5. - nanny marley replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      IBS-D vs Celiac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,342
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Muhammad
    Newest Member
    Muhammad
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      You may also need to supplement with B12 as this vitamin is also involved in iron assimilation and is often deficient in long-term undiagnosed celiac disease.
    • trents
      @par18, no, Scott's use of the term "false negative" is intentional and appropriate. The "total IGA" test is not a test used to diagnose celiac disease per se. The IGA immune spectrum response encompasses more than just celiac disease. So, "total IGA" refers to the whole pie, not just the celiac response part of it. But if the whole pie is deficient, the spectrum of components making it up will likely be also, including the celiac disease response spectrum. In other words, IGA deficiency may produce a tTG-IGA score that is negative that might have been positive had there not been IGA deficiency. So, the tTG-IGA negative score may be "false", i.e, inaccurate, aka, not to be trusted.
    • RMJ
      This may be the problem. Every time you eat gluten it is like giving a booster shot to your immune system, telling it to react and produce antibodies again.
    • asaT
      Scott, I am mostly asymptomatic. I was diagnosed based on high antibodies, low ferritin (3) and low vitamin D (10). I wasn't able to get in for the biopsy until 3 months after the blood test came back. I was supposed to keep eating gluten during this time. Well why would I continue doing something that I know to be harmful for 3 more months to just get this test? So I did quit gluten and had the biopsy. It was negative for celiacs. I continued gluten free with iron supps and my ferritin came back up to a reasonable, but not great level of around 30-35.  Could there be something else going on? Is there any reason why my antibodies would be high (>80) with a negative biopsy? could me intestines have healed that quickly (3 months)?  I'm having a hard time staying gluten free because I am asymptomatic and i'm wondering about that biopsy. I do have the celiacs gene, and all of the antibody tests have always come back high. I recently had them tested again. Still very high. I am gluten free mostly, but not totally. I will occasionally eat something with gluten, but try to keep to a minimum. It's really hard when the immediate consequences are nil.  with high antibodies, the gene, but a negative biopsy (after 3 months strict gluten-free), do i really have celiacs? please say no. lol. i think i know the answer.  Asa
    • nanny marley
      I have had a long year of testing unfortunately still not diagnosed , although one thing they definitely agree I'm gluten intolerant, the thing for me I have severe back troubles they wouldnt perform the tests and I couldn't have a full MRI because I'm allergic to the solution , we tryed believe me  I tryed lol , another was to have another blood test after consuming gluten but it makes me so bad I tryed it for only a week, and because I have a trapped sciatic nerve when I get bad bowels it sets that off terribly so I just take it on myself now , I eat a gluten free diet , I'm the best I've ever been , and if I slip I know it so for me i have my own diagnosis  and I act accordingly, sometimes it's not so straight forward for some of us , for the first time in years I can plan to go out , and I have been absorbing my food better , running to the toilet has become occasionally now instead of all the time , i hope you find a solution 🤗
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.