Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Elisa


holdthegluten

Recommended Posts

holdthegluten Rising Star

Has anyone ordered an ELISA panel to test for allergies? How do you do it? Is it expensive? What foods do they test for? Im looking for a test that will check for a bunch of different allergies, so i dont have to keep guessing about whats affecting me.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Rachel--24 Collaborator

I did the ELISA test. I did it through Great Smokies..(they have since changed name..not sure what they go by now).

The test was for over 100 foods....plus I had a seperate spice panel.

The cost was $350.

The test revealed nothing to me...it was not helpful at all.

Others may have had better results...I can only speak for myself in saying that of ALL the testing I did over 4 years....this was probably the least useful.

This is not a "proven" method of testing...lots of false negatives and false positives.

I always say that an elimination diet is far more reliable than this type of testing.

AndreaB Contributor

I had my whole family (except the baby) tested.

With ours, we eliminated what showed positive and then went through the rounds of adding one food at a time back in.

Most were accurate, some were not, others were a little problem that had been negative.

It gives you something to start out with as far as an elimination diet if you want the quick way, but as Rachel said you can just do the elimination diet.

We went through our doctor who does these through US BioTek. For the full panel IgG and IgE it was $550 I believe. IgG alone was less.

Murph Newbie

I did one thru York Labs a couple yrs ago (I think they've changed their name since) and it was VERY helpful. Tested ~116 foods and came back w/ yeast. It was what first made me realize I had intestinal candida. I'd been gluten-free 10 months at the time, dairy-free maybe 6 mo, sugar-free for a few and still felt horrible most of the time. The anti-candida diet did a LOT for me.

Rachel--24 Collaborator
The anti-candida diet did a LOT for me.

Same here. The candida diet put me in the right direction...I improved from this diet more than anything I'd done throughout my entire illness. I think most people with food intolerance caused by leaky gut would benefit from not feeding the candida.

I have pretty bad candida.....very high antibodies towards pathogenic yeast, leaky gut, many many food intolerances.....but my ELISA came back almost normal. :blink:

I had NO high reactivities at all...yeast did not show up....in fact NO foods showed up positive except a VL (very low) for banana. I aslo had a handful of VL's on the spice panel...that was it.

Thats why I dont have alot of faith in the test. I've had different types of testing since then..mostly alternative but leaky gut is definately an issue, candida is a BIG issue and the food intolerances and environmental sensitivities are through the roof.

I had been off the candida diet for almost 2 years now...but recently went back on it now that I've been diagnosed and am going through treatment.

I had a hard time just treating candida since I knew it wasnt solving the underlying issue....thats why I went off the diet when I did.

Reactions can also be caused by chemicals in food, mold, salicylates, pesticides, additives, etc. In these cases the ELISA wont show a problem. If a person reacts to all grains but doesnt test positive for them....it could be something else that they are reacting to...and not the food itself. For example all grains are moldy and if you are extremely sensitive to mold...you might react to grains.

This is why its always best to pay attention to your body...use the tests as a tool....but dont rely on them completely.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,647
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Julie 911
    Newest Member
    Julie 911
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I agree, there can be contamination at many points--milling is another possible source of contamination for any flours.
    • trents
      Keep in mind that with manufactured food products, "gluten free" doesn't equate to no gluten. Things that are naturally gluten free can be cross-contaminated with gluten in the field, in shipping and in processing. In the U.S. companies can use the gluten free label as long as the product doesn't exceed 20ppm of gluten. That amount still may cause a reaction in some people.
    • deanna1ynne
      Dd10 was tested for celiac four years ago bc two siblings were dx’d (positive labs and biopsies). Her results at the time were positive ema  and ttg (7x the UL), but a negative biopsy. We checked again three months later and her ttg was still positive (4x the UL), but ema and biopsy were negative. Doc said it was “potential celiac” and to keep eating gluten, but we were concerned about harming her growth and development while young and had her go gluten-free because we felt the labs and ema in particular were very suggestive of early celiac, despite the negative biopsies. She also had stomach aches and lethargy when eating it. We just felt it’d be better to be safe than sorry. Now, four years later, she doesn’t want to be gluten-free if she doesn’t “have to be,” so underwent a 12 week gluten challenge. She had labs done before starting and all looked great (celiac panel all negative, as expected.) Surprisingly, she experienced no noticeable symptoms when she began eating gluten again, which we felt was a positive sign. However, 12 weeks in, her labs are positive again (ttg 4x the UL and ema positive again as well). Doc says that since she feels fine and her previous two biopsies showed nothing, she can just keep eating gluten and we could maybe biopsy again in two years. I was looking up the ema test and the probability of having not just one but two false positives, and it seems ridiculously low.  Any advice? Would you biopsy again? She’s old enough at this point that I really feel I need her buy-in to keep her gluten-free, and she feels that if the doc says it’s fine, then that’s the final word — which makes me inclined to biopsy again and hope that it actually shows damage this time (not because I want her to have celiac like her sisters, but because I kind of think she already does have it, and seeing the damage now would save her more severe damage in the long run that would come from just continuing to eat gluten for a few more years before testing again.)  Our doc is great - we really like him. But we are very confused and want to protect her. One of her older sibs stopped growing and has lots of teeth problems and all that jazz from not catching the celiac disease sooner, and we don’t want to get to that point with the younger sis. fwiw- she doesn’t mind the biopsy at all. It’s at a children’s hospital and she thinks it’s kind of fun. So it’s not like that would stress her out or anything.
    • Inkie
      Thanks for the replies. I already use a gluten-free brand of buckwheat flakes I occasionally get itchy bumps. I'm still reviewing all my food products. I occasionally eat prepackaged gluten-free crackers and cookies, so I'll stop using those. I use buckwheat flakes and Doves Farm flour as a base for baking. Would you recommend eliminating those as well? It's a constant search.
    • Wheatwacked
      Gluten free food is not fortified with vitamins and minerals as regular food is.  Vitamin deficiencies are common especially in recently diagnosed persons,  Get a 25(OH)Vitamin D blood test. And work on raising it.  The safe upper blood level is around 200 nmol/L.    "Low serum levels of 25(OH)D have been associated with increased risk of autoimmune disease onset and/or high disease activity. The role of vitamin D in autoimmune diseases   🏋️‍♂️Good job!   I find the commercial milk will give me mild stomach burn at night, while pasture/grassfed only milk does not bother me at all.  While you are healing, listen to your body.  If it hurts to eat something, eat something else.  You may be able to eat it later, or maybe it is just not good for you.  Lower your Omega 6 to 3 ratio of what you eat.  Most omega 6 fatty acids are inflammation causing.    The standard american diet omega 6:3 ratio is estimated at upward of 14:1.  Thats why fish oil works
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.