Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

'dangerous' Levels Of Arsenic In 10% Of Rice


irish daveyboy

Recommended Posts

irish daveyboy Community Regular

This was a topic posted on the UK Gluten Free and DH Forum,.

.

Considering we Coeliacs use more rice based products than the average person, It's Frightening!!!!

.

A third of baby rice tested by the Food Standards Agency contains high levels of arsenic, one of the worst cancer causing chemicals, a leading expert has said..............................................

.

Ironically, the most likely to be exposed to high arsenic levels, he said, were infants, buyers of macro-biotic healthfood, people who buy rice milk and the Bangladeshi community, who buy a lot of rice from their home country where water naturally contaminated with arsenic are used to irrigate crops........

.

The EU has no standard for arsenic in food and Britain's level was set in 1959 before the cancer-causing effects of arsenic were understood. Prof Meharg says the most stringent standard is set by the Chinese, who are big eaters of rice......................................................

.

Rice from the United States, France, Italy and Bangladesh had the highest levels of inorganic arsenic. About 30 per cent of American long grain rice samples tested contain levels above the Chinese standard.

.

Read the whole article Open Original Shared Link

.

David


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Glutenfreefamily Enthusiast

Yikes thats scary! I gave up most rice and rice milk and stay with potatoes quite often for a large part of my meals and only occasionally have rice.

irish daveyboy Community Regular
Yikes thats scary! I gave up most rice and rice milk and stay with potatoes quite often for a large part of my meals and only occasionally have rice.

Hi Glutenfreefamily,

here's another post from another forum adding to the information covered in the original issue.

.

Actually, the story goes back a bit, with plenty of stuff written on it a few years ago.

The problem seems to be greatest if you are living in an area where both the rice, and the drinking water are contaminated with arsenic. Arsenic used to be a favourite poison if you wanted to solve a problematic marriage, or at least it seemed so in lots of old black and white films. I give my age away.

In the US, there is also a problem now that they are growing rice in old cotton fields.

In fact, the high levels of arsenic were poisonous to the rice, so the crops failed.

What did the farmers do? You guessed it. They bred arsenic-resistant rice crops.

The plants absorbed arsenic, but it didn't kill them.

We unsuspecting humans eat the rice, and absorb the arsenic and accumulate it.

Bladder cancer is one of the potential problems it causes, even in low doses.

Arsenic levels in US rice may be quite high.

This is all further proof of the need to grow and eat organic food. At least you are less likely to produce a time bomb for future generations if your fields are free of chemical poisons. If you eat organic, you might be less likely to consume those chemicals.

"The health effects of arsenic in food are hard to verify because the increase in cancer risk is small. Meharg estimates that if 10,000 people were exposed to the WHO limit over their lifetime, this would result in an extra 92 cases of bladder cancer."

Meharg is the expert with the concerns over arsenic in rice.

.

Open Original Shared Link

.

Open Original Shared Link

.

And as if arsenic in rice wasn't bad enough (at least we rich westerners can pick and choose our rice) imagine the fate of possibly 500,000,000 people (Yes, half a billion people!) in Asia who drink water from insecure groundwater sources.

Bihar, India: Survey of 3000 wells showed 12 with levels 20 times the WHO limits,

and 40% of wells over the limits.

Hanoi, Vietman: arsenic levels 300 times the WHO limits!

Bangladesh: 50,000,000 people face what the WHO calls

"...the world's worst mass poisoning disaster." .

.

Open Original Shared Link

.

We have no idea, do we?

.

David

home-based-mom Contributor

Let's see. We have arsenic in our rice and Open Original Shared Link. which may come from some of the same sources as the water that waters the rice ~ even organic rice. :ph34r:

Sheesh.

moldlady Rookie

Most of the rice grown in the US is gm long grain over those old cotton fields laced with arsenic. One could possibly switch to short grain brown rice to keep levels low.

It seems that more and more of our planet is toxic and we must keep a constant detox going for our bodies no matter what...

ML

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,257
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Rob New
    Newest Member
    Rob New
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      We have a category of articles on this topic if you really want to dive into it: https://www.celiac.com/celiac-disease/miscellaneous-information-on-celiac-disease/gluten-free-diet-celiac-disease-amp-codex-alimentarius-wheat-starch/
    • Scott Adams
      I agree with @trents, and the rash you described, especially its location and resistance to steroids, sounds highly characteristic of dermatitis herpetiformis, which is the skin manifestation of celiac disease. The severe and prolonged reaction you're describing five days after a small exposure is, while extreme, not unheard of for those with a high sensitivity; the systemic inflammatory response can absolutely last for several days or even weeks, explaining why you still don't feel right. Your plan to avoid a formal gluten challenge is completely understandable given the severity of your reactions, and many choose the same path for their well-being. While experiences with GliadinX (they are a sponsor here) are mixed, some people do report a reduction in the severity of their symptoms when taken with accidental gluten, though it is crucial to remember it is not a cure or a license to eat gluten and its effectiveness can vary from person to person. For now, the absolute best advice is to continue being hyper-vigilant about cross-contamination—buffets are notoriously high-risk, even with good intentions. Connecting with a gastroenterologist and a dermatologist who specialize in celiac disease is essential for navigating diagnosis and management moving forward. Wishing you a swift recovery from this last exposure. If you have DH you will likely also want to avoid iodine, which is common in seafoods and dairy products, as it can exacerbate symptoms in some people. This article may also be helpful as it offers various ways to relieve the itch:  
    • Scott Adams
      So just to be cautious, there is a big difference between cured, and responding to their medication. I assume you mean that your daughter responded well while taking KAN-101 during the trial, but the drug would not cure celiac disease, but may manage it while you are taking it. Let me know if I got this right.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Godfather! "Gluten-free" is not the same as zero gluten. The FDA standard for allowing the food industry to us the gluten-free label on a product is that it cannot exceed 20 ppm of gluten. That is safe for most celiacs but not for the subset of celiacs/gltuen sensitive people who are super sensitive. "Gluten-free" wheat starch products have been processed in such a way to remove enough of the protein gluten to comply with the FDA regulation but usually do retain some gluten and we usually get reports from some people on this forum who fall in the more sensitive range that such products cause them to react. Hope this helps. So, you may just have to experiment for yourself.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Dana0207! Another diagnostic approach would be to get biopsied for dermatitis herpetiformis which would not require an extensive exposure to gluten. But it would need to be done during an active outbreak of the rash. Celiac disease is the only known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it would be a definitive diagnosis. It might be tricky, however, to time the dermatology appointment with the gluten exposure and outbreak.
×
×
  • Create New...