Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help! Another ? About My Blood Work


horsesjapan

Recommended Posts

horsesjapan Apprentice

So I posted my test results before, but here they are again:

Gliadine IgA 2, range is <7

Gliadine IgG 8, range is <7, RESULT IS HIGH

Then, underneath, is this:

Interpretations:

REFERENCE RANGE:

IgA: <3 mg/L

IgG:

<3 yrs: 30 mg/L

>3 yrs: 18 mg/L

What does that mean?????? Are those *my* ranges or are those "normal" ranges for whoever "normal" people are? If those are mine, does that mean my IgA is low? I thought they didn't do a total IgA because nothing said "Total IgA". But I got to thinking I don't know what else it would be. If it *is* a total IgA on me, then is it low? Cause if it is then it would explain why the other IgA tests were negative. The doc had NO CLUE what the results meant (he didn't really even order the test, I saw a different doc, not my primary care doc when I went in the first time). Still waiting on my referral. I'd just try and call the lab, but the tests were run at a lab in Germany and I have no idea how to get in touch with them, and so far contacting the lab at the hospital here on base in Italy has not helped at all, they are just as clueless about celiac as the doc. Any help greatly appreciated!

Nancy, slowly going nuts waiting for an answer


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nora-n Rookie

I interpret this as that your results are in the grey zone. Sometimes labs are cryptic....

the reference range means the population refernce range, and that means that when they take 100 people, and take away the results from the top 2,5% and bottom 2,5% tis results in the refernce range.

The reference range in the top results, in your reaults, marked with < and a number, means that they reopt the results just as the manufacturer of the test has written, and that means:

1. your antigliadin IgG antibody test is above range and the antigliadin IgA test is negative,

2. the results found when they tried these tests on 100 random blood tests leftover from cholesterol screening or some other activity in the lab.....this is really stupid, that they incuded this, but I have seen things like that other places too.

It is not possible that this says anything about total IgA or total IgG, as the refernce range for IgA looks different. There is a bottom and a top for total IgA and total IgG.

Sometimes the people in the lab have no clue about what they do.

You still lack the most specific tests for celiac, tissu transglutaminase IgA and IgG version, and the total IgA, and the anti-endomysium test (but it is possible they discontinued this test in favour of Ttg)

I am in Norway and they often just do the ttg IgA and total IgA nowadays.

nora

horsesjapan Apprentice

Thank you for your explanation. It makes sense, though I agree that it is strange to include it! They did do the Endomysium IgA test which was negative, but w/out a total IgA I don't know if that is valid.

I finally got my referral put through from the doc, now I'm waiting to hear back from the GI with an appt. There are two hospitals I can go to here, one has a doc that specializes in celiac, so the referral lady requested that I see him if it all possible, I guess it depends on how soon each doc can get me in. Plus he is at the hospital that I know how to get to lol! I'm hoping the GI doc will do a tTg A and a tTg G and a total IgA. My doc seems to think he'll scope me too, but we'll see.

Back to the waiting game.

Nancy

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,543
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Carol Zimmer
    Newest Member
    Carol Zimmer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jsingh
      Hi,  I care for my seven year old daughter with Celiac. After watching her for months, I have figured out that she has problem with two kinds of fats- animal fat and cooking oils. It basically makes her intestine sore enough that she feels spasms when she is upset. It only happens on days when she has eaten more fat than her usual every day diet. (Her usual diet has chia seeds, flaxseeds, and avocado/ pumpkin seeds for fat and an occasional chicken breast.) I stopped using cooking oils last year, and when I reintroduced eggs and dairy, both of which I had held off for a few months thinking it was an issue of the protein like some Celiac patients habe mentioned to be the case, she has reacted in the same fashion as she does with excess fats. So now I wonder if her reaction to dairy and eggs is not really because of protein but fat.   I don't really have a question, just wondering if anyone finds this familiar and if it gets better with time.  Thank you. 
    • petitojou
      Thank you so much! I saw some tips around the forum to make a food diary and now that I know that the community also struggles with corn, egg and soy, the puzzle pieces came together! Just yesterday I tried eating eggs and yes, he’s guilty and charged. Those there are my 3 combo nausea troublemakers. I’m going to adjust my diet ☺️ Also thank you for the information about MCAS! I’m from South America and little it’s talked about it in here. It’s honestly such a game changer now for treatment and recovery. I know I’m free from SIBO and Candida since I’ve been tested for it, but I’m still going to make a endoscopy to test for H. Pylori and Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Thank you again!! Have a blessed weekend 🤍
    • knitty kitty
      Yes, I, too, have osteoporosis from years of malabsorption, too.  Thiamine and magnesium are what keep the calcium in place in the bones.  If one is low in magnesium, boron, selenium, zinc, copper, and other trace minerals, ones bone heath can suffer.  We need more than just calcium and Vitamin D for strong bones.  Riboflavin B 2, Folate B 9 and Pyridoxine B 6 also contribute to bone formation and strength.   Have you had your thyroid checked?  The thyroid is important to bone health as well.  The thyroid uses lots of thiamine, so a poorly functioning thyroid will affect bone heath.  
    • Celiac50
      That sounds so very likely in my case! I will absolutely ask my doctor on my next bone check coming up in March... Thanks a lot! 
    • trents
      Calcium levels as measured in the blood can be quite deceiving as the body will rob calcium from the bones to meet demands for it by other bodily functions. Also, supplementing with calcium can be counterproductive as it tends to raise gut pH and decrease absorption. More often than not, the problem is poor absorption to begin with rather than deficiency of intake amounts in the diet. Calcium needs an acidic environment to be absorbed. This is why so many people on PPIs develop osteoporosis. The PPIs raise gut pH. And some people have high gut PH for other reasons. Low pH equates to a more acidic environment whereas high pH equates to a more basic (less acidic) environment.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.