Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Confused...


skappy

Recommended Posts

skappy Newbie

About 3 years ago I was diagnosed with IBS (I went to the doc with bloating, changes in bowel movements, gas, etc). In May I was diagnosed with a gastric ulcer and was on meds for 3 months to find that the ulcer was gone but I had gastritis. After continuing on meds I continued to feel worse so I finally went off (I had tried 5 of 6 acid reducers and nothing worked). I actually felt better being off meds, but my IBS symptoms were still acting up.

I was recently tested for celiac and my IGA levels were 14 (11 is normal), IGG levels were 100 (11 is normal) and TTG levels were negative. I had a biopsy 3 years ago that came back negative. Is it possible to have developed celiac in that time period, or could the biopsy have been a false-negative? Are you born with celiac? In addition to the general "IBS" symptoms I have, I have experienced fairly rapid weight loss (10 pounds in about 3 months) with no change to my diet or activity (if anything I'm eating more unhealthy foods and exercising less). Any advice anyone can offer is greatly appreciated.

Thank you!!!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ShayFL Enthusiast

Yes, you sure could have developed it in that 3 years time. Your blood work is STRONG positive and you should request a biopsy NOW to look for damage. Either way, there are plenty of doctors who would dx you with those bloods plus your symptoms alone.

If you are still eating gluten, now is the time for biopsy. Back then you may not have had enough damage to show up in biopsy. Or they didnt take enough samples from enough different areas or the technician was not skilled enough to read your slides correctly. You have likely had Celiac all along. So as you suspect....a false negative is very likely back then. This is a common situation for many in here.

You are not born with Celiac. You can be born with the genes, but you need a trigger (gluten). So as soon as you get formula or food with gluten you CAN develop Celiac (or at any point in your life). The truth is we simply do not know why exactly people with the same genes and exposure to the same triggers do not develop the disease the same.

You should ask for GENETIC testing as well just to make it complete.

So now. Get ALL of the testing out of the way and start eating gluten-free as soon as your biopsy is done. Prepare yourself and your kitchen. Be ready.

And here is to you getting better!!

skappy Newbie

Thank you so much for the response! Everything you said makes perfect sense, and I am going to go get a biopsy. Hopefully I'll be able to change my diet after that and start feeling better soon!

Mom2Twins Rookie

I also wanted to add, from what I have read, is that while some of the tests are very specific (the tTG and EMA), they won't be positive until you have severe damage in your intestine. I think I read somewhere that a positive tTG correlates with total villous atrophy, meaing you have no villi left.

In most diseases, they don't wait for your organ to be destroyed before they diagnose you! I noticed your Ttg was normal - so you could be either gluten sensitive or in the early stages of celiac.

If your biopsy is normal, I would not count celiac or gluten sensitivity out. I read an amazing book recently - called "going against the grain", and I would recommend you read it. It really opened my eyes on the issues of grains and health problems.

All the best, keep us posted.

Sue

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. 0

      Penobscot Bay, Maine: Nurturing Gluten-Free Wellness Retreat with expert celiac dietitian, Melinda Dennis

    2. - Scott Adams replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    3. - Jane02 replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,326
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    PattyPagnanelli
    Newest Member
    PattyPagnanelli
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I do not know this, but since they are labelled gluten-free, and are not really a product that could easily be contaminated when making them (there would be not flour in the air of such a facility, for example), I don't really see contamination as something to be concerned about for this type of product. 
    • trents
    • Jane02
      Thanks @Scott Adams. Do you know if Kirkland Signature supplements share facility and production lines with other products containing gluten?  I'm worried that I'll react to this brand just like I did with other gluten-free labelled supplement brands. 
    • Matthias
    • Scott Adams
      This is a really common area of confusion. Most natural cheeses (cheddar, Swiss, mozzarella, Parmesan, brie, camembert, and most blue cheeses) are inherently gluten-free, and you’re right that the molds used today are typically grown on gluten-free media. The bigger risks tend to come from processed cheeses: shredded cheese (anti-caking agents), cheese spreads, beer-washed rinds, smoke-flavored cheeses, and anything with added seasonings or “natural flavors,” where cross-contact can happen. As for yeast, you’re also correct — yeast itself is gluten-free. The issue is the source: brewer’s yeast and yeast extracts can be derived from barley unless labeled gluten-free, while baker’s yeast is generally safe. When in doubt, sticking with whole, unprocessed cheeses and products specifically labeled gluten-free is the safest approach, especially if you’re highly sensitive.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.