Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Testing For Cleiac Or Not


heavy

Recommended Posts

heavy Apprentice

I have 4 kids and my 6 yr old has been tested postive for gluten intollarance. She has had a scope for celiac disease and it was negative. Her blood work states that she has the DNA that makes up celiac so the Dr. put her on a gluten free diet. My 3yrs old started having systems so we got her tested too. DNA was the same and we found out that she is allergic to milk, eggs and whey. The Dr. did not want to do a scope on her but did put her on a gluten free diet. My other 2 kids she didn't want to see because they have no systems. I took them to there regular Dr. along with myself and had us do a DNA test to see if we were positive for the DNA to celiac disease. My 2 kids came back positive for the DNA and I didn't. I'm having other problems with gaining wieght so my dr. is doing a scope on me just to make sure there is nothing going on. Since I've been eating gluten free I've lost 10 lbs and currantly weigh 94lbs. Just to be sure his is testing me for celic. My question is. If they have the DNA to celiac disease do they need to be on a gluten free diet to prevent it turning into celiac or even having complacations later on in life. Do I need to have them tested for food allergies when they have no signs of any problems with food. We all follow the diet at home but with the other 2 kids they eat what ever at school and at friends house. I don't know much about this so I'm a little confused. Since my DNA test was negitive could I still have Celiac disease?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



TrillumHunter Enthusiast

People can carry the gene and never develop celiac. You can not have the gene and have celiac because all the genes aren't identified. The kids should all be tested because there can be intestinal damage without outward symptoms.

We are in the same situation. I am blood/biopsy positive celiac. My kids all had negative blood work/positive genes. Only one kid tested borderline. But, they all had health issues so we opted to try the gluten free diet for them. We have had great results. By default my husband went gluten-free and has improved health as well. We have made a choice for our kids because of the gene. They may chose otherwise as adults. It isn't necessary and some discourage it but for us it is a personal choice.

Mother of Jibril Enthusiast

I have a few thoughts...

1) If all of your kids have the genes for celiac, why wait for major problems to develop? You could be saving them so much suffering by getting them off gluten or at least cutting way back.

2) I'm still waiting for my own DNA test, but I was having a lot of abdominal symptoms (pain, gas, bloating, constipation) and when I stopped eating gluten there was a dramatic improvement. However, long before I had these symptoms I had acne, hair loss, depression, heavy periods... signs of hypothyroidism, which is an autoimmune disorder that frequently clusters with celiac. Years before I noticed the pain, foods like gluten (and now I'm thinking corn too) were damaging my intestines and letting all sorts of undigested particles leak out into my bloodstream where they didn't belong. That's what causes autoimmune disorders... it messes with your immune system's ability to recognize what is "you" and what is "not you" and then it starts destroying things that shouldn't be destroyed... like your pancreas (type 1 diabetes), thyroid (hypothyroidism), adrenal glands (Addison's disease), joints (rheumatoid arthritis), nervous system (epilepsy, MS), etc... Nasty.

3) "Dangerous Grains" helped me understand "non-celiac gluten sensitivity" (although I'm sure I still have a lot more to learn) B) If the diet is doing good things for you, does it matter if it's celiac or not?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,327
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LaF
    Newest Member
    LaF
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      71.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • AdelaW
      Thank you so much for your reply! Yes, I am definitely struggling with my GI and support, I wish that I had been warned to not change my habits after the biopsy and posting of results as I then would have continued to eat gluten and would have no need for a trial. But I unfortunately need an official diagnosis as I cannot get accommodations in college without one, so I am thinking to do the gluten trial! Do you think 2 weeks will be long enough, by the time I begin I will only have been gluten free for about 2 months. I'm considering looking for another GI or a celiac specialist like you mentioned, that could really help! Thank you for your response and advise, hopefully I won't feel too horrible during the trial (although it is hard to imagine going back to gluten after feeling good for the first time in months without it), but I hope it will work out! Thanks again
    • knitty kitty
      No, I haven't tried Gliadin X, although @Scott Adams might be able to discuss his experiences.   I think it's a bad idea to take GliadinX during your gluten challenge.  You won't mount a strong enough autoimmune response.  
    • knitty kitty
      Yes, it is possible to have Celiac Disease without lymphocytosis.  
    • Scott Adams
      By the way, this new article is very relevant to this thread:  
    • Scott Adams
      The FDA doesn't regulate nutraceuticals like this. The AN-PEP enzyme has been used for decades in commercial beer brewing as a clarifying agent, and is no longer patentable, thus no pharmaceutical companies are interested in it specifically, although there are companies that are trying to develop their own version of it that can be patented. 
×
×
  • Create New...