Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

18 Days Gluten Free - Too Late For Antibody Blood Test?


beingmommy

Recommended Posts

beingmommy Rookie

I've been gluten free for 18 days. Is it too late to get the antibody test?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cruelshoes Enthusiast

It can take quite a while for bloodwork results to drop (months or longer in some people). You may get positive results with only 18 days gluten-free. But the bloodwork is only the first step in the diagnosis process. If the bloodwork is positive (and often if it isn't) your GI will want to order an endoscopy. Changes to the villi have been shown to occur in less than 2 weeks on the gluten-free diet. It can be quite a while to get an appointment for the biopsy. If you remain gluten-free all that time, your chance of getting accurate test results is greatly diminished.

If what you want is a gold standard diagnosis, you need to continue eating gluten until after all of the testing is complete.

beingmommy Rookie

Darn, I can't eat gluten at present because I am nursing my 17 month old DS who just got diagnosed with probable celiac.

Edited to add: His diagnosis is "probable" because we are forgoing the biopsy as he is so young and it is so invasive. But his antibody blood test was positive 18 days ago. He hasn't been gaining weight so he needed to be gluten free ASAP before of affects his development. I guess I will have to look into it for myself somewhere down the line . . .

cruelshoes Enthusiast

If it were me, I would have the complete celiac panel run immediately, and then let those results determine the next steps. No harm in getting the blood work done. If you decide to do this, make sure your doctor orders the full panel, and not just one or two if the tests.

Good luck with whatever you decide to do.

beingmommy Rookie

Thanks! I will talk to our doc about it. I guess if there is a chance it can be positive it would be worth it and if it's negative I know I could still have it ( and check again at some point when I can do a gluten challenge - i.e. no longer nursing)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,198
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Joanne01
    Newest Member
    Joanne01
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
    • trents
      @JettaGirl, "Coeliac" is the British spelling of "celiac". Same disease. 
    • JettaGirl
      This may sound ridiculous but is this supposed to say Celiacs? I looked up Coeliacs because you never know, there’s a lot of diseases related to a disease that they come up with similar names for. It’s probably meant to say Celiacs but I just wanted to confirm.
    • JoJo0611
      I was told it was to see how much damage has been caused. But just told CT with contrast not any other name for it. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.