Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gluten-free Poultry (chicken, Turkeys)


SEAliac

Recommended Posts

SEAliac Rookie

My mother-in-law talked to our local butcher about gluten-free turkeys. He suggested Bell and Evans brand. I just called them and talked to a woman named Jen. She assured me that they don't add anything to their birds so they are gluten-free. All their chicken and turkey leaves their packaging facility as fresh poultry. They may freeze some of it in a separate freezer room before shipping, but they don't add anything to the meat that would be problematic. The butcher was absolutely right!

The website showed that they even have a few types of breaded tenders and nuggest that are made using rice flour so they are gluten-free as well. This is now my favorite brand of poultry!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lovegrov Collaborator

Read the ingredients on any chicken or turkey. Gluten grains must be listed if included.

richard

SEAliac Rookie
Read the ingredients on any chicken or turkey. Gluten grains must be listed if included.

richard

I don't mean to be critical, but I think you may be misinformed. My understanding of the FDA's requirement for labeling is that "wheat", as one of the Big 8 allergens, must be listed. I haven't seen anything yet published by the FDA that says rye, barley, and oats must be listed as well. The appellation "gluten-free" is only voluntary; so if something has in it rye or barley derivatives that contain the gluten proteins, then the manufacturer isn't required to list it. Likewise, even if the manufacturer hasn't added anything WRBO, they don't have to label the item gluten-free. That is what scares me every time I see "natural flavorings" such as may be included in the broth injected into some poultry. Unless the label states gluten-free, I don't know that "natural flavorings" are safe. Two incidents in the last two months with rapid-onset symptoms after I ate chicken have convinced me to check each brand.

Lisa Mentor
I don't mean to be critical, but I think you may be misinformed. My understanding of the FDA's requirement for labeling is that "wheat", as one of the Big 8 allergens, must be listed. I haven't seen anything yet published by the FDA that says rye, barley, and oats must be listed as well. The appellation "gluten-free" is only voluntary; so if something has in it rye or barley derivatives that contain the gluten proteins, then the manufacturer isn't required to list it. Likewise, even if the manufacturer hasn't added anything WRBO, they don't have to label the item gluten-free. That is what scares me every time I see "natural flavorings" such as may be included in the broth injected into some poultry. Unless the label states gluten-free, I don't know that "natural flavorings" are safe. Two incidents in the last two months with rapid-onset symptoms after I ate chicken have convinced me to check each brand.

I believe that the USDA requires that ALL grains be labeled in meats and poultry. It is separate from the FDA Labeling Law.

(someone else can provide a supporting link)

ravenwoodglass Mentor
I believe that the USDA requires that ALL grains be labeled in meats and poultry. It is separate from the FDA Labeling Law.

(someone else can provide a supporting link)

Here it is:

Open Original Shared Link

Unfortunately we are still at risk from both barley malt used as a natural flavoring and unlike with FDA regulations, modified food starch does not have to be identified as a to source. When we see natual flavors or modified food starch added to meats we do need to check the safety for us. Hydrolized protein and actual grain does need to be declared.

MODIFIED FOOD STARCH - starch that has been chemically altered to improve its thickening properties. Before the starch is modified, it is separated from the protein through isolation techniques; therefore, the source of the starch used is not required on the label.

What are Labeling Requirements for Additives?

The statutes and regulations to enforce the statutes require certain information on labels of meat and poultry products so consumers will have complete information about a product. In all cases, ingredients must be listed on the product label, in the ingredients statement in order by weight, from the greatest amount to the least.

Substances such as spices and spice extractives may be declared as "natural flavors," "flavors," or "natural flavoring" on meat and poultry labels without naming each one. This is because they are used primarily for their flavor contribution and not their nutritional contribution.

Substances such as dried meat, poultry stock, meat extracts, or hydrolyzed protein must be listed on the label by their common or usual name because their primary purpose is not flavor. They may be used as flavor enhancers, binders, or emulsifiers. They must be labeled using the species of origin of the additive, for example, dried beef, chicken stock, pork extract, or hydrolyzed wheat protein.

Color additives must be declared by their common or usual names on labels, e.g., FD&C Yellow 5, or annatto extract, not collectively as colorings. These labeling requirements help consumers make choices about the foods they eat.

SEAliac Rookie

Here it is:

Open Original Shared Link

Thank you! As your answers always are, this is informative and much appreciated.

lovegrov Collaborator

When I've called the USDA they've told me that ANY grain MUST be listed because it adds nutritive value. I have been told specifically that barley has to be listed.

richard


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,260
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    HaleighA
    Newest Member
    HaleighA
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jmartes71
      Hello, I just wanted to share with the frustration of skin issues and seeing dermatologist and medications not working for years, I did my own healing experiment. As of last week I have been taking a drop internally under the tongue of Vetiver and putting on topically on sores Yellow/Pom.I am seeing a extreme difference at a rapid time.Im also noticing my nails a little harder. Ive always been into natural properties because I feel its safer for the body.I know short time, but really seeing a difference. I also feel the the trapped gases that causes bloating helps break down as well.Curious if any body else can benefit from and has tried. Products is made by Doterra by Dr Hill
    • Scott Adams
      We have a category of articles on this topic if you really want to dive into it: https://www.celiac.com/celiac-disease/miscellaneous-information-on-celiac-disease/gluten-free-diet-celiac-disease-amp-codex-alimentarius-wheat-starch/
    • Scott Adams
      I agree with @trents, and the rash you described, especially its location and resistance to steroids, sounds highly characteristic of dermatitis herpetiformis, which is the skin manifestation of celiac disease. The severe and prolonged reaction you're describing five days after a small exposure is, while extreme, not unheard of for those with a high sensitivity; the systemic inflammatory response can absolutely last for several days or even weeks, explaining why you still don't feel right. Your plan to avoid a formal gluten challenge is completely understandable given the severity of your reactions, and many choose the same path for their well-being. While experiences with GliadinX (they are a sponsor here) are mixed, some people do report a reduction in the severity of their symptoms when taken with accidental gluten, though it is crucial to remember it is not a cure or a license to eat gluten and its effectiveness can vary from person to person. For now, the absolute best advice is to continue being hyper-vigilant about cross-contamination—buffets are notoriously high-risk, even with good intentions. Connecting with a gastroenterologist and a dermatologist who specialize in celiac disease is essential for navigating diagnosis and management moving forward. Wishing you a swift recovery from this last exposure. If you have DH you will likely also want to avoid iodine, which is common in seafoods and dairy products, as it can exacerbate symptoms in some people. This article may also be helpful as it offers various ways to relieve the itch:  
    • Scott Adams
      So just to be cautious, there is a big difference between cured, and responding to their medication. I assume you mean that your daughter responded well while taking KAN-101 during the trial, but the drug would not cure celiac disease, but may manage it while you are taking it. Let me know if I got this right.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Godfather! "Gluten-free" is not the same as zero gluten. The FDA standard for allowing the food industry to us the gluten-free label on a product is that it cannot exceed 20 ppm of gluten. That is safe for most celiacs but not for the subset of celiacs/gltuen sensitive people who are super sensitive. "Gluten-free" wheat starch products have been processed in such a way to remove enough of the protein gluten to comply with the FDA regulation but usually do retain some gluten and we usually get reports from some people on this forum who fall in the more sensitive range that such products cause them to react. Hope this helps. So, you may just have to experiment for yourself.
×
×
  • Create New...