Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Food Labelling And Ingredients: Canada Vs. Usa


Mourning Dove

Recommended Posts

Mourning Dove Newbie

I recently came back from a vacation in the USA and I noticed that some products have labeling that actually says "gluten-free"....like margarine! I was so surprised by this honest labeling! If only this were the standard! Imagine how easy grocery shopping would be!

In all of my shopping in Canada, I have to go to a health-food store to see that phrase, with the exception of Chapman's ice cream. (Hurray for Chapmans!)

Now I'm wondering if there are differences between US foods and their Canadian counterparts. Could this be why it seems that am I seeing more "gluten-free" labeling in the USA? Do we just grow so much wheat here that nearly everything is contaminated? It remains a mystery to me why Canadian icing sugar is contaminated while US icing sugar is safe...is anyone able to enlighten me on this one?

Can someone direct me to a listing of foods that are safe in one country and not in the other?

Any insights would be much appreciated.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



psawyer Proficient

Canada has very strict rules about what can be labeled, or represented as, "gluten free." They cover what the product may contain, but also prohibit the use of the label on any product which is inherently gluten-free, such as margarine.

The US currently does not have a definition that is backed by law or regulation. Proposed regulations are being discussed, but are not in force. In the US, "gluten free" means whatever the company making the product wants it to mean.

Mourning Dove Newbie
Canada has very strict rules about what can be labeled, or represented as, "gluten free." They cover what the product may contain, but also prohibit the use of the label on any product which is inherently gluten-free, such as margarine.

The US currently does not have a definition that is backed by law or regulation. Proposed regulations are being discussed, but are not in force. In the US, "gluten free" means whatever the company making the product wants it to mean.

If that's how Canada dictates how things are to be labelled, well, I'm not comfortable with that. Everything is so inconsistent...Ice cream can be gluten free...or not. Sorbet could be gluten-free...or not. Tomato sauce could be gluten free...or not. There's no particular purpose for there to be gluten in it, but there often is...and why? why? I'm so frustrated by this lack of consistency! Never the less, I thank you for this information.

Thanks for the heads up on the US labeling. I'll be extra cautious from now on.

psawyer Proficient

The rule in Canada is that if a product does not normally contain gluten, then you can not label your version of that product "gluten-free." That would be considered misleading, as it might imply that some similar products contain gluten.

As a result, fruits and vegetables, meats, milk, butter, margarine, and cheese, among other things, can not be labeled "gluten-free." It does not mean that they contain gluten, just that the producer cannot make a claim that they are gluten-free for marketing purposes.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,691
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Gigi2025
    Newest Member
    Gigi2025
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Symptoms that get worse if you don't supplement is a sign of malabsorption, possibly due to Celiac disease. Blood tests for nutritional deficiencies are not very accurate, and should be done when you have been off of supplements for eight to twelve weeks, otherwise the vitamin supplements you've taken will be measured.  The blood circulation system is a transportation system.  It transports the vitamins you've absorbed around the body, but blood tests don't give an accurate picture of the vitamin and mineral stores inside organs and tissues where they are actually used.  You can have "normal" blood levels but still have deficiencies.  This is because the brain demands stored nutrients be put into the blood stream to supply important organs, like the brain and heart, while other organs do without.   If you are taking Thiamine Mononitrate in your supplements, you are probably low in thiamine.  Thiamine Mononitrate is used in many supplements because it won't break down sitting on a shelf.  This also means Thiamine Mononitrate is difficult for the body to utilize.  Only thirty percent of Thiamine Mononitrate on the label is absorbed and even less is able to be utilized by the body.  A different form of Thiamine called Benfotiamine has been shown to promote intestinal healing.   Talk to your doctor about doing a genetic test to look for Celiac markers.   I'm concerned that if you do a gluten challenge (10 grams of gluten per day for a minimum off two weeks) in your weakened state, the nutritional deficiencies will become worse and possibly life threatening.  
    • ElisaAllergiesgluten
      Hello, good afternoon!   I apologize, I didn’t see a notification and I’m just reading this. Thank you so much for sharing your thoughts and the link. Yes you are absolutely right, even so trying to get a response from them has been extremely difficult. They don’t answer but I will your practice of “guilty until proven innocent.”   I like and have a sense of trust here in this website, everyone is honest and thoughts are raw. The mutual understanding is amazing!   thank you Scott!
    • Scott Adams
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.