Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Confusing Lab Results


roshimaximom

Recommended Posts

roshimaximom Newbie

Hi All,

I've been reading here a long time but not posting. Very quick background on us: my 3 year old son has had a myriad of health issues since he was tiny and had his first celiac tests a year and a half ago. At that time he had a positive genetic screen (I am not sure which) and he had low IgA (14) so the other test wasn't valid, but didn't show active celiac. He has been having increasing diarrhea and tiredness lately so I convinced (hard to do for some reason) our pedi to re-do his celiac panel last week. He got:

his tTG Ab, IgA is 31, with a positive being over 8

his total IgA is 40 with the normal reference range being 24 to 121

his Gliadin Ab IgA is 3 with the positive being over 17.

We're going to be referred to a pediatric GI doc (he has seen them once before actually).

Thoughts? I guess if he's going to have a biopsy, I should *not* take him off wheat yet, right? I guess my confusion is how can his tTG be in the "moderate to high" celiac range when his Gliadin is low? I appreciate the opinions of those who know more than me ;)

Thank you!

Larissa and Macky

P.S. Will be reading about experiences doing biopsies on 3 year olds. I admit to not looking forward to it, assuming that is where we're headed.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



roshimaximom Newbie

talking to myself a little, but in case someone else reads this later with a similar question, the Ped GI Nurse Practitioner called and said yeah, its a very strong positive for celiac and we need to biopsy, and I decided to go for it, they're calling to schedule within 24 hours.

Hi All,

I've been reading here a long time but not posting. Very quick background on us: my 3 year old son has had a myriad of health issues since he was tiny and had his first celiac tests a year and a half ago. At that time he had a positive genetic screen (I am not sure which) and he had low IgA (14) so the other test wasn't valid, but didn't show active celiac. He has been having increasing diarrhea and tiredness lately so I convinced (hard to do for some reason) our pedi to re-do his celiac panel last week. He got:

his tTG Ab, IgA is 31, with a positive being over 8

his total IgA is 40 with the normal reference range being 24 to 121

his Gliadin Ab IgA is 3 with the positive being over 17.

We're going to be referred to a pediatric GI doc (he has seen them once before actually).

Thoughts? I guess if he's going to have a biopsy, I should *not* take him off wheat yet, right? I guess my confusion is how can his tTG be in the "moderate to high" celiac range when his Gliadin is low? I appreciate the opinions of those who know more than me ;)

Thank you!

Larissa and Macky

P.S. Will be reading about experiences doing biopsies on 3 year olds. I admit to not looking forward to it, assuming that is where we're headed.

Tallforagirl Rookie
...his tTG Ab, IgA is 31, with a positive being over 8

his total IgA is 40 with the normal reference range being 24 to 121

his Gliadin Ab IgA is 3 with the positive being over 17.

We're going to be referred to a pediatric GI doc (he has seen them once before actually).

Thoughts? I guess if he's going to have a biopsy, I should *not* take him off wheat yet, right? I guess my confusion is how can his tTG be in the "moderate to high" celiac range when his Gliadin is low? I appreciate the opinions of those who know more than me ;)

Thank you!

Larissa and Macky

P.S. Will be reading about experiences doing biopsies on 3 year olds. I admit to not looking forward to it, assuming that is where we're headed.

The tTG is the one that counts as far as diagnostic accuracy, and being positive it seems there's a good chance it's celiac disease.

The endoscopy and biopsy is a very straightforward and quick procedure, as it's performed under sedation. He won't feel a thing.

happygirl Collaborator

The reason that one may be positive and one negative (or variations thereof) is that none of the tests are perfect, and they do not correlate 1:1. If that were the case, then they would only need to run one test - but none of the tests are perfect.

Do not go gluten free until all testing is completed.

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

The biopsy has been the "gold standard" of diagnosis since the 1960's--but nowadays, the blood tests available are far, far more accurate ind informative than what was available 50 years ago!

Most doctors would consider your child's blood work to be a definitive diagnosis of celiac. Now, it's possible that there might be something else that your doctor wants to look for--but he can look for it later if a gluten-free diet doesn't eliminate symptoms.

An endoscopy/biopsy IS one of the less intrusive surgeries--not like open-heart surgery, for example. Yet, it DOES carry major risks--infection, reaction to sedation, puncture, etc. These risks are obviously greater in a small child.

If it were my child, I would try the NON-invasive option (the gluten-free diet) first, and only opt for an endoscopy/biopsy if after, say a couple of months, I saw little or no improvement in symptoms. And I DO have a child who has been through open-heart surgery.

I think it's great that your doctor ordered--and correctly interpreted --the blood tests for celiac. But my experience, and the experience of many here, has led me to believe that the only reason that the biopsy is still being touted by many doctors as the "gold standard" of diagnosis is that they get a lot of money from it. Obviously, they don't make a penny from a diet change.

Whatever you decide, best of luck, and please keep us posted.

Oh--and until those intestinal issues are resolved, I would delay any further vaccinations, and do some research on www.nvic.org. With those intestinal issues, your little one is at risk for serious vaccine reactions.

roshimaximom Newbie

Thanks for the feedback, everyone. I've struggled with the risk of the biopsy. My son has not been under general anaesthesia before but my daughter has - she has hypomineralized molars and had to have dental surgery (yes, she is getting a celiac panel done this week). the GI wants us to do a biopsy on Feb 17, and to stay on gluten until then. I am mixed on it. I feel like well, he has it, I know he has it. But, I've worked with this GI nurse practitioner a lot (again for his sister), and I think she has his best interest at heart, and based this and on other stuff in our family (history of structural anomaly in digestive tract that is genetic, and a lab he had that shows low pancreatic enzymes) I am leaning toward doing the scope.

We are already limited vaccinators - but I will keep this in mind. I a not planning any new vaccines for him in 2009.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - cristiana replied to sha1091a's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Issues before diagnosis

    2. - chrisinpa commented on Scott Adams's article in Skin Problems and Celiac Disease
      2

      Celiac Disease and Skin Disorders: Exploring a Genetic Connection

    3. - knitty kitty replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      3

      My journey is it gluten or fiber?

    4. - trents replied to sha1091a's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Issues before diagnosis

    5. - trents commented on Jefferson Adams's article in Other Diseases and Disorders Associated with Celiac Disease
      6

      Celiac Disease Patients Face Higher Risk of Systemic Lupus

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,692
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Ali Zaib
    Newest Member
    Ali Zaib
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      I agree, it so often overlooked! I live in the UK and I have often wondered why doctors are so reluctant to at least exclude it - my thoughts are perhaps the particular tests are expensive for the NHS, so therefore saved for people with 'obvious' symptoms.  I was diagnosed in 2013 and was told immediately that my parents, sibling and children should be checked.  My parents' GP to this day has not put forward my father for testing, and my mother was never tested in her lifetime, despite the fact that they both have some interesting symptoms/family history that reflect they might have coeliac disease (Dad - extreme bloating, and his Mum clearly had autoimmune issues, albeit undiagnosed as such; Mum - osteoporosis, anxiety).  I am now my father' legal guardian and suspecting my parents may have forgotten to ask their GP for a test (which is entirely possible!) I put it to his last GP that he ought to be tested.  He looked at Dad's blood results and purely because he was not anemic said he wasn't a coeliac.  Hopefully as the awareness of Coeliac Disease spreads among the general public, people will be able to advocate for themselves.  It is hard because in the UK the NHS is very stretched, but the fallout from not being diagnosed in a timely fashion will only cost the NHS more money. Interestingly, a complete aside, I met someone recently whose son was diagnosed (I think she said he was 8).  At a recent birthday party with 8 guests, 4 boys out of the 8 had received diagnosis of Coeliac Disease, which is an astounding statistic  As far as I know, though, they had all had obvious gastric symptoms leading to their NHS diagnosis.  In my own case I had  acute onset anxiety, hypnopompic hallucinations (vivid hallucinations upon waking),  odd liver function, anxiety, headaches, ulcers and low iron but it wasn't until the gastric symptoms hit me that a GP thought to do coeliac testing, and my numbers were through the roof.  As @trents says, by the grace of God I was diagnosed, and the diet has pretty much dealt with most of those symptoms.  I have much to be grateful for. Cristiana
    • knitty kitty
      @xxnonamexx, There's labeling on those Trubar gluten free high fiber protein bars that say: "Manufactured in a facility that also processes peanuts, milk, soy, fish, WHEAT, sesame, and other tree nuts." You may want to avoid products made in shared facilities.   If you are trying to add more fiber to your diet to ease constipation, considering eating more leafy green vegetables and cruciferous vegetables.  Not only are these high in fiber, they also are good sources of magnesium.  Many newly diagnosed are low in magnesium and B vitamins and suffer with constipation.  Thiamine Vitamin B1 and magnesium work together.  Thiamine in the form Benfotiamine has been shown to improve intestinal health.  Thiamine and magnesium are important to gastrointestinal health and function.  
    • trents
      Welcome to celiac.com @sha1091a! Your experience is a very common one. Celiac disease is one the most underdiagnosed and misdiagnosed medical conditions out there. The reasons are numerous. One key one is that its symptoms mimic so many other diseases. Another is ignorance on the part of the medical community with regard to the range of symptoms that celiac disease can produce. Clinicians often are only looking for classic GI symptoms and are unaware of the many other subsystems in the body that can be damaged before classic GI symptoms manifest, if ever they do. Many celiacs are of the "silent" variety and have few if any GI symptoms while all along, damage is being done to their bodies. In my case, the original symptoms were elevated liver enzymes which I endured for 13 years before I was diagnosed with celiac disease. By the grace of God my liver was not destroyed. It is common for the onset of the disease to happen 10 years before you ever get a diagnosis. Thankfully, that is slowly changing as there has developed more awareness on the part of both the medical community and the public in the past 20 years or so. Blessings!
    • knitty kitty
      @EndlessSummer, You said you had an allergy to trees.  People with Birch Allergy can react to green beans (in the legume family) and other vegetables, as well as some fruits.  Look into Oral Allergy Syndrome which can occur at a higher rate in Celiac Disease.   Switching to a low histamine diet for a while can give your body time to rid itself of the extra histamine the body makes with Celiac disease and histamine consumed in the diet.   Vitamin C and the eight B vitamins are needed to help the body clear histamine.   Have you been checked for nutritional deficiencies?
    • sha1091a
      I found out the age of 68 that I am a celiac. When I was 16, I had my gallbladder removed when I was 24 I was put on a medication because I was told I had fibromyalgia.   going to Doctor’s over many years, not one of them thought to check me out for celiac disease. I am aware that it only started being tested by bloodwork I believe in the late 90s, but still I’m kind of confused why my gallbladder my joint pain flatulent that I complained of constantly was totally ignored. Is it not something that is taught to our medical system? It wasn’t a Doctor Who asked for the test to be done. I asked for it because of something I had read and my test came back positive. My number was quite high.Are there other people out here that had this kind of problems and they were ignored? 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.