Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Avoiding Celiacs?


ligeia

Recommended Posts

ligeia Apprentice

This doesn't really make sense to me but I was just talking to a friend who has an adopted daughter (genetics unknown) so she is going to try to *avoid* the onset of celiacs. I have a 2.5 yr old who I suspect may be sensitive to gluten and I have just decided to try taking her off of gluten for a little while to see if I notice a difference. However, I also have a nearly 8 month old baby. Here's my real question: Is there a way I can avoid the disease with him? He still has not really had solids, literally only a taste of gluten someone had given him and a couple veggies here and there, he's pretty much exclusively breastfed right now. Friend was saying that it helps to delay introduction of gluten for at least the first year if not the first 1.5-2 years and then to continue offering breastmilk for the first few months of gluten introduction, which makes sense to me since breastmilk kind of coats the gut with good stuff. There was something else too but now I can't remember.

Has anyone attempted to avoid the disease with their children? Can someone explain how it is even possible to avoid it? I am intrigued, I would be so happy if there were something I could do to keep my son from getting it.

Thanks


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Mommy2Many Newbie

I'm pretty new at this myself but from what I have read and been told by the doctors celiac disease is genetic. You either have the gene or you don't. They say that some people who have the gene don't even ever know it because they don't ever have any symptoms. My son went 12 years WITH symptoms before being diagnosed. From what he has been through and what I know about it now I would recommend getting your kids tested to see if they have the gene. It's just bloodwork that will tell you if they have it or not. If they have it I would just go along with the gluten-free diet. Since they are so young I would think it would be easier to get them adjusted to the food. I have another son who is 5 and has the same symptoms as my 12 year old who was just diagnosed. We have decided to get his bloodwork done to see if he has the gene as well but if it comes back that he does there is no reason to put him through a biopsy. We'll just have another gluten-free child. Hope this helps. I have read so many things about how kids are misdiagnosed all the time with doctors saying they are lactose intollerant or that they have GERD and they will grow out of it. The doctors will not see celiac disease in regular bloodwork and you need to request a special "Celiac Plus" panel done by a special lab called Prometheus. This panel will give you a definate answer as to if your child has one of the genes and at what risk he/she may be at with the disease. Good luck to you!

ligeia Apprentice

Thanks for the reply. I kind of thought it was too good to be true, just wanted to get some other opinions on it.

ryebaby0 Enthusiast

Prometheus is not the only lab that can do Celiac panels -- those are common tests that have to be ordered by your doctor, but most any lab can have those processed/run with a regular blood draw. Just wanted to clear that one up~

Also -- what you often read is that studies show a correlation between early introduction of "the big 7" allergens and food allergies. This is statistically a link, but remember that is a statistic over a large group. So while it is true for the group, there's absolutely no way to know if it is true for a single individual. If you have a very strong family history of strong allergies, doctors will sometimes recommend waiting to introduce egg, peanut, etc -- but that is no guarantee.

Immune system malfunctions require many things to activate, and no one is certain what combination will flip the switch in a particular person. Certainly a genetic test will give you a piece of that puzzle, but there's no way to "avoid" celiac disease. Your thoughts about the genetic marker are right on -- if he doesn't even have it, why put him through a biopsy, and if he does, why bother with one instead of just putting him gluten-free too.

ligeia Apprentice

So, he either has it or not and whether or not he appears to have celiacs now, he inevitably will if he has the genetic marker, am I understanding correctly?

ryebaby0 Enthusiast

No...if he doesn't have at least one of the the genetic markers, he can't develop celiac

if he does have the genetic marker, he could (but not necessarily will) develop celiac

Kibbie Contributor
This doesn't really make sense to me but I was just talking to a friend who has an adopted daughter (genetics unknown) so she is going to try to *avoid* the onset of celiacs. I have a 2.5 yr old who I suspect may be sensitive to gluten and I have just decided to try taking her off of gluten for a little while to see if I notice a difference. However, I also have a nearly 8 month old baby. Here's my real question: Is there a way I can avoid the disease with him? He still has not really had solids, literally only a taste of gluten someone had given him and a couple veggies here and there, he's pretty much exclusively breastfed right now. Friend was saying that it helps to delay introduction of gluten for at least the first year if not the first 1.5-2 years and then to continue offering breastmilk for the first few months of gluten introduction, which makes sense to me since breastmilk kind of coats the gut with good stuff. There was something else too but now I can't remember.

Has anyone attempted to avoid the disease with their children? Can someone explain how it is even possible to avoid it? I am intrigued, I would be so happy if there were something I could do to keep my son from getting it.

Thanks

There is a new study that took infants who had 1st degree relatives with celiac disease and 1/2 of them were given gluten at the recommended age of 6 months and the other 1/2 were not given any gluten until after they had turned 1 year old. 100% of the children who did not get gluten until after 1 year old have not developed celiac disease yet (I say yet because as we know it can 'turn on' at any time) but the idea is that delaying the introduction to gluten can either delay the onset of celiac disease or possibly prevent it. (something like 40-60% of the kids who were given gluten before 1 year developed the disease according to the study) I'm looking for it now it was in my Alamo Celiac newsletter.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.