Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Let's Get Writing


celiac3270

Recommended Posts

celiac3270 Collaborator

Be sure to write and mention labeling for celiac disease...include that 1 in 133 have it so this will become increasingly impt. as more get diagnosed.

Be sure to reference Docket No. 2004N-0463.

FDA News

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

P05-15

April 1, 2005

Media Inquiries: Kimberly Rawlings

301-827-6242

Consumer Inquiries: 888-INFO-FDA

FDA Asking for Public Comment on Food Label Changes

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today asked for public comment on two proposals to improve the appearance and content of the nutrition label to help consumers make better-informed weight management decisions. The proposals focus on providing practical serving size information and increasing the prominence of calories on the food label.

The proposals are direct responses to the recommendations contained in the FDA's Obesity Working Group (OWG) report entitled "Calories Count." The OWG final report made short and long-term recommendations that are based on the scientific fact that weight control is mainly a function of caloric balance.

"Today's action demonstrates our commitment to make the food label more meaningful and helpful to consumers," said Dr. Robert Brackett, Director of FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. "We are interested in exploring how modifying the food labeling regulations might give consumers better information they can use to control and manage their weight."

In the first Advanced Notice of Proposed Rule Making (ANPRM), Food Labeling; Prominence of Calories, FDA is requesting comments on how calories appear on packaged food and how consumers use this information in making healthier dietary choices. Additionally, the agency is seeking comment on the reformulation of the foods or redesign of packaging that may occur if any changes are made to the food label.

The second ANPRM, Food Labeling: Serving Sizes of Products that Can Reasonably Be Consumed At One Eating Occasion; Updating of Reference Amounts Customarily Consumed (RACCs); Approaches for Recommending Smaller Portion Sizes, addresses the issue of serving size information on the food label, as well as possible ways to revise the label that would make it easier for consumers to choose more healthful foods. In the ANPRM, FDA is asking if changes should be made requiring that pre-packaged foods reasonably consumed during one eating occasion state the nutrition information for the entire package. For example, a 20-ounce soda would be required to list the total amounts of its nutritional content on the labeling.

Both of the ANPRMs have an open comment period for 75 days. Interested persons can submit comments, referencing the docket number, electronically to fdadockets@oc.fda.gov or in writing to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, room 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cdford Contributor

Once again we owe you our thanks, celiac3270.

MySuicidalTurtle Enthusiast

You want us to say we support this and mention celiac disease labeling?

Ummm.

celiac3270 Collaborator

Lol...sorry...I saw this at Delphi and assumed it was about celiac disease--didn't read that it was about WEIGHT MANAGEMENT instead of just what label changes would help consumers.....oops. That's what happens when for one article you don't read beyond the first sentence or two.

Although, on the other topic, I guess it can be deceiving when companies put ridiculously small portion sizes as a "serving" so that the calories/fat are deceiving...for example, if they call a serving size of potato chips as being 3 chips, they can say 3 grams of fat and the consumer often doesn't think to consult the serving size.....that's an exaggeration, but you get my point. Sorry it isn't as celiac disease-related as I thought....although we could write them about celiac disease for the hell of it :lol:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Paulaannefthimiou's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Bob red mill gluten free oats

    2. - trents replied to jenniber's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Disaccharide deficient, confusing biopsy results, no blood test

    3. - Paulaannefthimiou posted a topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Bob red mill gluten free oats

    4. - jenniber replied to jenniber's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Disaccharide deficient, confusing biopsy results, no blood test

    5. - trents replied to SamAlvi's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      High TTG-IgG and Normal TTG-IgA

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,847
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    L.Garcia24
    Newest Member
    L.Garcia24
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Not necessarily. The "Gluten Free" label means not more than 20ppm of gluten in the product which is often not enough for super sensitive celiacs. You would need to be looking for "Certified Gluten Free" (GFCO endorsed) which means no more than 10ppm of gluten. Having said that, "Gluten Free" doesn't mean that there will necessarily be more gluten than "Certified Gluten" in any given batch run. It just means there could be. 
    • trents
      I think it is wise to seek a second opinion from a GI doc and to go on a gluten free diet in the meantime. The GI doc may look at all the evidence, including the biopsy report, and conclude you don't need anything else to reach a dx of celiac disease and so, there would be no need for a gluten challenge. But if the GI doc does want to do more testing, you can worry about the gluten challenge at that time. But between now and the time of the appointment, if your symptoms improve on a gluten free diet, that is more evidence. Just keep in mind that if a gluten challenge is called for, the bare minimum challenge length is two weeks of the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten, which is about the amount found in 4-6 slices of wheat bread. But, I would count on giving it four weeks to be sure.
    • Paulaannefthimiou
      Are Bobresmill gluten free oats ok for sensitive celiacs?
    • jenniber
      thank you both for the insights. i agree, im going to back off on dairy and try sucraid. thanks for the tip about protein powder, i will look for whey protein powder/drinks!   i don’t understand why my doctor refused to order it either. so i’ve decided i’m not going to her again, and i’m going to get a second opinion with a GI recommended to me by someone with celiac. unfortunately my first appointment isn’t until February 17th. do you think i should go gluten free now or wait until after i meet with the new doctor? i’m torn about what i should do, i dont know if she is going to want to repeat the endoscopy, and i know ill have to be eating gluten to have a positive biopsy. i could always do the gluten challenge on the other hand if she does want to repeat the biopsy.    thanks again, i appreciate the support here. i’ve learned a lot from these boards. i dont know anyone in real life with celiac.
    • trents
      Let me suggest an adjustment to your terminology. "Celiac disease" and "gluten intolerance" are the same. The other gluten disorder you refer to is NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) which is often referred to as being "gluten sensitive". Having said that, the reality is there is still much inconsistency in how people use these terms. Since celiac disease does damage to the small bowel lining it often results in nutritional deficiencies such as anemia. NCGS does not damage the small bowel lining so your history of anemia may suggest you have celiac disease as opposed to NCGS. But either way, a gluten-free diet is in order. NCGS can cause bodily damage in other ways, particularly to neurological systems.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.