Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

To Test Or Not To Test


curiousmomma

Recommended Posts

curiousmomma Newbie

hi all. I am new to posting to the boards but I have been lurking for a while now. seems you guys are one of the best resources for finding out what is and is not gluten free.

My almost 5 year old has been gluten free for almost 6 months now. a little of our story...

about a year ago I noticed a lump in her groin area. It concerned me so I took her to the doctor. expecting a hernia. this was thought to be the case. but nothing was definite. I was ok with that for a while but noticed it changed size etc. so I asked for some more testing. She was also having tummy aches constantly, sometimes to the point of tears, and incontinence where there had been none previously. We had an x-ray and fond her to be constipated. so badly that there was food matter in her tummy backed up because it had nowhere to go. a doctor wanted to just put her on miralax and leave it at that. I did that to clear her out but wanted more answers. She had never had bowel troubles like this before and it concerned me. all bloodwork came back ok as far as white counts and such.

after some thought and talking witha friend whose sone is gluten-free due to behavioral issues I decided to try that. it seemed the least invasive way to find out if this was her trouble. since she has been gluten-free she has not had any constipation and no more tummy troubles. It is going on 6 months now.

She still has the lump in her groin which I was hoping would go away. My hope was that it was a lymph node responding to gluten in her system and swelling as a result....grapsing at straws...I know. I will deal with that another way since it has been a year now.

as for the gluten-free though I am wondering about getting her tested or not getting her tested. everything in me thinks it is a bad idea to test her because if it comes back negative then why stay gluten-free even though I really think that has helped. but I also worry that instead of an actual intolerance she actually has celiacs and then worry about any residual damage to her small intestine if she does get gluten accidentally. Plus to be perfectly honest my husband tries but is not always as vigilant as I would like. so if she comes up negative, which I have heard can happen incorrectly, then I worry I will NEVER get him to pay attention.

any thoughts and/or experiences with testing? I appreciate any and all help here...


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



SD77 Newbie

It can be a hard decision to make.

Has she had any reactions when/if she accidentally got gluten? To test her, she'll have to go back on gluten for a while, or you can try the genetic test. Also, she's probably not in school right now...you may want a formal diagnosis so the school will work with you.

An indirect approach, is to get yourself and husband tested, and either of you come back positive, then you can decide what to do next.

Good Luck!!

Shannon

chiroptera Apprentice

You probably know this, but if you choose the traditional route of testing (ped gastro, first a blood panel, then an endoscopy to take a biopsy) they have to be eating gluten. It is very important not to go gluten free first if you chose this route. We did for our twin daughters and the doctors said we would have to put them back on gluten for 6 months, eating the equivalent of 4 slices of bread a day, in order to do the biopsy. So, if you want to do this she will have to go back to eating gluten. In our case we chose not to do that, one because of their improvement and two, because they are nine and will not even look at gluten let alone eat it. One says she feels sick to her stomach just walking down the bread aisle.

Now, you could ask a doctor to run a gene panel because that doesn't matter if someone is eating gluten or not. We did and they had one of the most prominent genes for Celiac (plus their paternal grandma is a Celiac, traditionally diagnosed about 1o years ago). This will not tell you for sure if she has Celiac but can tell you if she won't ever develop it.

Another reason we didn't put them back on gluten is, for us, we are scared of doing the biopsy anyway as for young children they put them under and there are risks, although very small in the procedure itself. Now if one of my children was not better and still sick my thought may change and I may have done it. It is such a personal opinion and realistically the test is very safe and usually well tolerated.

One thing we also did was use stool testing via Enterolab (which will open a can of worms because many people do not agree with Dr. Fine) and they came back gluten, casein and egg intolerant. In our opinion, Enterolab was great to do because there is no risk involved at all and it gave our family a sense of reassurance that we do need to be off gluten. Most insurances do not pay for the testing, but at the time we did it my husband had a job so we could do it. Plus, our med insurance wasn't that great so we had out of pocket costs anyhow. Again, a very personal decision.

I can totally see wanting to feel like you know for sure that your child cannot eat gluten. Everything was going great and we felt all empowered and all; then we had to go out of town and we took all of our own food and drink for four days. That was very hard and I had thoughts of "geez do we really need to be doing this?"

But, then reality hit me because I know what works for my kids (and me too) and that is being gluten free!

Like it or not

hope that helps :)

Benshell Explorer

My 6 year old was diagnosed with celiac via blood test, no outright gastro symptoms, just no weight gain for 6 months. We chose NOT to do the endoscopy also, due to the scaryness of the anesthesia (putting her completely out). The dr felt he would be "very surprised" not to find any damage in the endoscopy, therefore would put her on a gluten free diet. So we just skipped point A to get to point B as we would have gotten there anyway.

It's been a little over 2 weeks that she's been Gluten Free and I've noticed some changes - she doesn't have BM as much (she used to go 3 times a day), now she goes once. Very rarely complains of tummy aches or headaches anymore (used to a lot). It's been a challenge trying foods as she misses her old stuff, but I've been making a lot from scratch and very healthy (good for all of us). My only complaint is the junk food is so loaded with sugar (I guess to make up for the texture/taste) and it makes her hyper. So I limit it to one "sugar" a day (cookie, bars, etc..)

Good luck and know that there are other parents that also decided NOT to do the endoscopy and just go gluten free...as they say - the proof is in the gluten free pudding.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.