Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Long Can I Be Gluten-Free Before It Affects Biopsy Results?


rachel-gf

Recommended Posts

rachel-gf Newbie

My question for all of you is: How long can I be on a gluten-free diet before it would affect my biopsy enough that celiac disease could no longer be detected?

I am trying to get a biopsy but it is taken longer than I expected.

History: Several years ago, I suspected I had a wheat or gluten sensitivity of some sort, and reduced (but did not eliminate) gluten completely from my diet. In fall 2009, I decided to go through with testing given a family history of celiac disease and autoimmune problems. So I went on a high-gluten diet for several months.

I did the Enterolab tests (result: active gluten sensitivity, 1 celiac allele, 1 gluten sensitivity allele) and Prometheus Celiac Plus panel (still waiting for results). After seeing the Enterolab results, my specialist doctor said that I should get a biopsy.

At that point, I was absolutely miserable (both GI symptoms, bloated, body weight had increased within 6 weeks by 6-8 pounds), anxious. And I went on a gluten-free diet. And I started feeling better quickly. I thought I could get a biopsy quickly, and that a few weeks of gluten-free wouldn't affect the biopsy results. To my surprise, the doctor in the city where I live now is offering me appointments in February!

The idea of going back on gluten is, well, sickening. How long can I stay on my gluten-free diet before my gut will heal enough that I might not diagnosed with celiac disease (if I do have celiac disease)? If I do need to start eating gluten again for the biopsy, how much and for how long? I know I have a gluten sensitivity and plan to keep gluten-free after the biopsy, so I want to do the biopsy now so that I can have that information should it ever become necessary without having to re-gluten myself again at some point in the future.

Many thanks, and a happy, gluten-free new year to all.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



happygirl Collaborator

6-8 weeks, plus more time til your biopsy, is too long for an accurate biopsy.

There is no point of having a biopsy to look for Celiac, when you have been gluten free for over 2 months. If your Prometheus bloodwork is positive, esp for the most specific tests, then the combo of the gene+positive bloodwork+symptoms (and, improvement in symptoms) is enough to have you stay on the diet.

tarnalberry Community Regular

How quickly the gut heals varies from person to person. Some see distinct improvement in a few weeks, others take months or more. But I certainly wouldn't expect accurate results if you're gluten free for two months prior to a biopsy!

And, honestly, you don't need one. It's fairly old-school to rely on the biopsy as the only way to conclusively diagnose. You've got multiple positive tests - stool test, blood test, dietary test. I think three for three is a good enough indication that you should stay gluten free!

putman Newbie

Hey there, sorry about your diagnosis, but you know what? its really not bad at all. Once you eliminate whats making you sick you will feel like you have your life back. I want everyone to know that if you stop eating gluten and your symptoms DO NOT disappear rapidly... as was the case for me, please, please pickup the book "Life Without Bread" your answers lie in that book.

I had the genetic test done and sure enough had all the genetic markers for Celiacs and had all the wretched symptoms associated with it. Going Gluten-free DID NOT help me! What did help me was applying the theory from "Life Without Bread" by Wolfgang Lutz and Christian Allen. Its truly a life saver, and is clinically proven to work. Google it!

rachel-gf Newbie

Hi everyone,

Thanks for your replies. I really appreciate the support and advice! I've been gluten-free for 2.5 weeks now and am feeling SO much better.

I'm going to keep trying to get an appointment with this specialist doctor in my new city and see what he thinks. I'm also going to wait and see what my blood test says. In the meantime, I'm going to stay gluten-free because I just feel SO much better and was so sick before. If the doctor thinks I need to do another gluten challenge for the biopsy, maybe I will. The idea of starting to eat gluten again for some unbounded period of time is just so gross. And my biopsy may come back negative anyway and I will still know that gluten makes me sick.

I knew I had some gluten issue for a few years, and had eliminated let's say 90% of the gluten from my diet. Doing the gluten challenge really made it clear what a huge problem it is for me and is motivating me to get rid of the rest of the gluten.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,634
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    dysmathers
    Newest Member
    dysmathers
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • deanna1ynne
      Dd10 was tested for celiac four years ago bc two siblings were dx’d (positive labs and biopsies). Her results at the time were positive ema  and ttg (7x the UL), but a negative biopsy. We checked again three months later and her ttg was still positive (4x the UL), but ema and biopsy were negative. Doc said it was “potential celiac” and to keep eating gluten, but we were concerned about harming her growth and development while young and had her go gluten-free because we felt the labs and ema in particular were very suggestive of early celiac, despite the negative biopsies. She also had stomach aches and lethargy when eating it. We just felt it’d be better to be safe than sorry. Now, four years later, she doesn’t want to be gluten-free if she doesn’t “have to be,” so underwent a 12 week gluten challenge. She had labs done before starting and all looked great (celiac panel all negative, as expected.) Surprisingly, she experienced no noticeable symptoms when she began eating gluten again, which we felt was a positive sign. However, 12 weeks in, her labs are positive again (ttg 4x the UL and ema positive again as well). Doc says that since she feels fine and her previous two biopsies showed nothing, she can just keep eating gluten and we could maybe biopsy again in two years. I was looking up the ema test and the probability of having not just one but two false positives, and it seems ridiculously low.  Any advice? Would you biopsy again? She’s old enough at this point that I really feel I need her buy-in to keep her gluten-free, and she feels that if the doc says it’s fine, then that’s the final word — which makes me inclined to biopsy again and hope that it actually shows damage this time (not because I want her to have celiac like her sisters, but because I kind of think she already does have it, and seeing the damage now would save her more severe damage in the long run that would come from just continuing to eat gluten for a few more years before testing again.)  Our doc is great - we really like him. But we are very confused and want to protect her. One of her older sibs stopped growing and has lots of teeth problems and all that jazz from not catching the celiac disease sooner, and we don’t want to get to that point with the younger sis. fwiw- she doesn’t mind the biopsy at all. It’s at a children’s hospital and she thinks it’s kind of fun. So it’s not like that would stress her out or anything.
    • Inkie
      Thanks for the replies. I already use a gluten-free brand of buckwheat flakes I occasionally get itchy bumps. I'm still reviewing all my food products. I occasionally eat prepackaged gluten-free crackers and cookies, so I'll stop using those. I use buckwheat flakes and Doves Farm flour as a base for baking. Would you recommend eliminating those as well? It's a constant search.
    • Wheatwacked
      Gluten free food is not fortified with vitamins and minerals as regular food is.  Vitamin deficiencies are common especially in recently diagnosed persons,  Get a 25(OH)Vitamin D blood test. And work on raising it.  The safe upper blood level is around 200 nmol/L.    "Low serum levels of 25(OH)D have been associated with increased risk of autoimmune disease onset and/or high disease activity. The role of vitamin D in autoimmune diseases   🏋️‍♂️Good job!   I find the commercial milk will give me mild stomach burn at night, while pasture/grassfed only milk does not bother me at all.  While you are healing, listen to your body.  If it hurts to eat something, eat something else.  You may be able to eat it later, or maybe it is just not good for you.  Lower your Omega 6 to 3 ratio of what you eat.  Most omega 6 fatty acids are inflammation causing.    The standard american diet omega 6:3 ratio is estimated at upward of 14:1.  Thats why fish oil works
    • Inkie
      I  notice a reaction to tea bags, possibly due to gluten or other substances. Is this recognizable?
    • trents
      The blood tests you had done are not the main ones. The two main ones are the "Total IGA" (to check for IGA deficiency) and the "TTG-IGA". Current guidelines for the "gluten challenge" when people have been gluten free for a significant time period are the daily consumption of at least10g of gluten (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for at least two weeks leading up to the day of the blood draw. That should give you some perspective.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.