Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Negative Ttg And Ema...is That Conclusive Enough?


stomica

Recommended Posts

stomica Rookie

My 3 1/2 year old daughter has had poop issues (sorry for the bluntness!) since she was about 18 months old. She's been diagnosed with colitis through a colonoscopy. She's taking medication for colitis, which is a non-specific topical anti-inflammatory for the colon. She was tested for celiac but only the IgG's and IgA's were elevated. The other two more sensitive tests were negative. The ped GI retested her again (while she was on gluten) but he only did the ttg and ema tests, both of which were negative. He's a great doc. He says without doubt she does NOT have celiac. He does feel she has a wheat allergy in addition to inflammatory bowel disease (colitis). The allergist, however, feels she could very well have a gluten intolerance. I did put her on a dairy free/gluten free diet for a few months. It was hard to say if it worked or not...she was doing well (digestively speaking) at the time, so it wasn't a huge difference. I do think she slept better. (She has night terrors every stinkin' night...I don't think she's ever slept through the night!) Anyway, my question is how conclusive are the ttg and ema tests? Any thoughts would be appreciated!

Sue


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Emme999 Enthusiast

Sue,

Hello. The tTG is extremely sensitive. This is from the book "Dangerous Grains" (my fav. book to quote ;))

"The tTG test usually identifies about 98% of those who have celiac disease, and it is a very specific test that can be used to rule out celiac disease in 95% of patients. This test appears to be superior to endomysium antibody testing, not only because it is less costly but also because it is a little better at identifying celiac disease and because interpretive bias is reduced by the use of computer scanning."

As for EMA Testing:

"This test is very sensitive, and it will identify 90% or more of those patients with flat intestinal walls, but some evidence suggests that it is less reliable for identifying cases with milder intestinal damage. ... However, a negative EMA blood test has limited value for excluding celiac disease. This test is also limited by the need for individual observation and evaluation of stained blood cells."

I hope that helped!

It sounds to me like your daughter has non-celiac gluten sensitivity - which means that both of your doctors are right ;) Are you aware that gluten sensitivity and celiac disease aren't necessarily the same thing? (I don't mean to sound condescending, I didn't know much about it before I started studying :))

Here's a little more from the book:

"Research into human genes now reveals that non-celiac gluten sensitivity, or immune reactions to gluten, may affect as many as 90 million Americans. The evidence suggests that these gluten-sensitive individuals face many of the same hazards associated with untreated celiac disease. ... Gluten sensitivity is much more common, yet is is sought and diagnosed even less frequently than celiac disease."

Obviously your little girl is having an immune response to gluten (since her IgG's and IgA's were elevated). This is a sign that something in her body is not happy when she eats those foods, and probably doesn't help her digestive system much. Also, when you eat something you have a reaction to - it causes a lot of inflammatory conditions, and might be adding to her anxiety (in the form of night terrors). If she was mine, I would probably keep her away from gluten and dairy as much as possible.

Good luck! :)

- Michelle :wub:

stomica Rookie

Hey Michelle - Sorry I'm so delinquint in responding, but I've been out of town...Anyway, I wanted to thank you for your response! The information has been very helpful. It's always nice to know there are actual facts out there! Thanks again!

Sue

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,204
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Donna Yunkus
    Newest Member
    Donna Yunkus
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Fayeb23
      Thank you that’s really helpful, hopeful won’t have to have a biopsy.
    • RMJ
      That means the normal range (i.e. not celiac disease) would be a result less than 14.99.  Your result is WAY above that. Some gastroenterologists would diagnose that as celiac disease even without a confirming biopsy because it is more than ten times the top of the normal range.
    • Redanafs
      Hi everyone. Back in 2022 I had blood work drawn for iga ext gliadin. Since then I’ve developed worse stomach issues and all other health issues. My doctor just said cut out gluten. He did no further testing. Please see my test results attached. I just need some direction cause I feel so ill and the stomach pain is becoming worse. Can this test show indications for other gastrointestinal diseases?
    • Fayeb23
      Thank you. These were the results TTG ABS NUMERICAL: > 250.0 U/mL [< 14.99]  Really don’t understand the results!
    • Scott Adams
      Clearly from what you've said the info on Dailymed is much more up to date than the other site, which hasn't been updated since 2017. The fact that some companies might be repackaging drugs does not mean the info on the ingredients is not correct.
×
×
  • Create New...