Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Back Again: Will These Tests Be Good Enough To Point To Celiac Or Not?


VitaminDGirl

Recommended Posts

VitaminDGirl Apprentice

So I did a saliva test some weeks ago that showed I am off the charts positive on this test: Gliadin Ab, SIgA (Saliva). (Borderline is 13-15 and I was 62!)~ Dr. said he calls this a "gluten allergy".

Sooooo yes, I will come off gluten, but I am still interested in learning if I am celiac or not so have remained on for now.

Today the dr. ordered these blood tests:

IgA Anti-tissue transglutaminase AND

IgA Anti-endomysium antibodies.

Will the above results be accurate enough to indicate celiac or not?

AND in case he decides to do an internal biopsy (and I accept) is it ok to be off gluten, or do I need to stay on it until that test is done as well?

Thanks.

Vitamin D Girl. :P


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

Yes you do need to keep eating gluten until the biopsy is done. After the biopsy you can start a diet trial. False negatives are not uncommon with both blood and biopsy so do the trial even if the test results are negative.

Your doctor should also have ordered a total IGA and there are a couple of other tests that can be done but I can't think of the names of them right now, someone else will know and answer though and hopefully tell you them. If you total IGA is low that will cause a false negative on the IGA tests.

VitaminDGirl Apprentice

Yes you do need to keep eating gluten until the biopsy is done. After the biopsy you can start a diet trial. False negatives are not uncommon with both blood and biopsy so do the trial even if the test results are negative.

Your doctor should also have ordered a total IGA and there are a couple of other tests that can be done but I can't think of the names of them right now, someone else will know and answer though and hopefully tell you them. If you total IGA is low that will cause a false negative on the IGA tests.

Thank you for your response.

I am not sure I quite understand all the testing.

I guess I"m fearing I've not ordered enough or the right tests (by my dr).

I mean, if these tests come back positive, it then means I probably have celiac, and only a biopsy could confirm?

But if it's negative, I may still have celiac and should get a biopsy?

If I know my antibodies are high already, would it have been better to just get the genetic celiac test? I mean, b/c if that was positive, chances are I have celiac with such high gluten antibodies, right?

Or maybe not.

I've been trying to research all of this, but am still left a bit confused. :unsure:

VitaminDGirl Apprentice

ps how many posts do we have to make before we don't have to go through the approval by the moderator anymore? Or are everyone's comments always moderated?

Just wondering. :P

nora-n Rookie

Hi I do not know anything about that, and my posts show up right away.

About the total IgA, here in Europe they automatically do that if they order the IgA celiac tests in most places.

Jestgar Rising Star

If I know my antibodies are high already, would it have been better to just get the genetic celiac test? I mean, b/c if that was positive, chances are I have celiac with such high gluten antibodies, right?

There is no clearly defined "celiac gene". The genetic tests show associated genes only, so, no, the genetic test will not tell you if you have celiac disease.

Jestgar Rising Star

ps how many posts do we have to make before we don't have to go through the approval by the moderator anymore? Or are everyone's comments always moderated?

Just wondering. :P

You're close. :)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Gardening Apprentice

The celiac panel our local lab ran included:

anti-gliadin IGG

anti-gliadin IGA

TTG IGG

TTG IGA

anti-endomysial IGA

total IGA

Aside from total IGG, I can't think of anything else that could be included, and I thought it was pretty thorough.

You do need a total IGA, because if you don't make enough IGA in general, you can't make a high enough anti-gliadin IGA (or TTG, etc) to register as positive. Therefore, it could give you a false negative.

nora-n Rookie

Note that the EMA test is only IgA, since this is not an automated test.

they take a piece of monkey esophagus and incubate with the blood test, and look in an electronic microscope for flourescence which is caused by IgA.

There is no IgG version of that test.

Sometimes medical papers mention endomysium IgA and IgG, but obviously they then mean the ttg test.

VitaminDGirl Apprentice

"Today the dr. ordered these blood tests:

IgA Anti-tissue transglutaminase AND

IgA Anti-endomysium antibodies."

Okkk....I'm still a bit confused.

The dr. ordered the above tests.

If they are positive, I should for sure do the biopsy and it will show me if I have celiac?

And if the biopsy is negative, does it mean I"m not celiac?

And if the above tests are negative, do I order additional bloodwork of some sort?

If the biopsy is positive, but the tests above are negative, I have celiac?

Someone told me that getting the blood test to see if you carry the gene (which one of you said really doesn't do that?)... if positive means you probably will get it sometime in your life. If negative, I can't have it?

I hope my questions aren't too confusing and someone can help me out.

Thanks.

nora-n Rookie

These two tests are considered the most specifi tests for celiac nowadays, but recently the new deamidated gliadin test has been introduced several places and it is considered a bit better than the ttg test.

The endomysium test is the most specific one for celiac.

Note there are lots of false negatives, and the cutoffs are set very high as the doctor do not want any, ANY, false positives....so you might still be celiac despite of negative tests.

Or, you could still turn positive in the future.

these tests are really dependent on tissue damage, not just antibodies to gliadin like the antigliadin test.

most people with the gene will not develop celiac, as the gene is very common, like 30% or so of the population.

VitaminDGirl Apprentice

These two tests are considered the most specifi tests for celiac nowadays, but recently the new deamidated gliadin test has been introduced several places and it is considered a bit better than the ttg test.

The endomysium test is the most specific one for celiac.

Note there are lots of false negatives, and the cutoffs are set very high as the doctor do not want any, ANY, false positives....so you might still be celiac despite of negative tests.

Or, you could still turn positive in the future.

these tests are really dependent on tissue damage, not just antibodies to gliadin like the antigliadin test.

most people with the gene will not develop celiac, as the gene is very common, like 30% or so of the population.

Ok, thanks for all of that. Very helpful!

I did the gliadin test by saliva and I was very high.

Supposedly my bloodwork above is 'in' now. I'm waiting for the dr's office to call with results. If they don't I plan to go pick them up from the lab myself tonight.

Stay tuned, and thanks again for all of the 'newbie' support! Much appreciated. :D

VitaminDGirl Apprentice

Ok, thanks for all of that. Very helpful!

I did the gliadin test by saliva and I was very high.

Supposedly my bloodwork above is 'in' now. I'm waiting for the dr's office to call with results. If they don't I plan to go pick them up from the lab myself tonight.

Stay tuned, and thanks again for all of the 'newbie' support! Much appreciated. :D

Ok, so they just called and I'm negative on the bloodwork. So, the odds are equal still that I could be celiac even with negative bloodwork?

Is the biopsy the only other way to find out?

Or should I ask for other kinds of blood tests?

Thanks in advance.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Ok, so they just called and I'm negative on the bloodwork. So, the odds are equal still that I could be celiac even with negative bloodwork?

Is the biopsy the only other way to find out?

Or should I ask for other kinds of blood tests?

Thanks in advance.

Yes you could still be celiac. The choice to biopsy is up to you but be aware that may come back a false negative also. If you are going to biopsy then stay on gluten until that is done. If your not going to biopsy then go ahead and get started on a strict trial of the diet. Your body know the answer.

VitaminDGirl Apprentice

Do you have any idea of any research (or just from being on these boards) how often someone with negative blood results of IgA Anti-tissue transglutaminase ad IgA Anti-endomysium comes back with a positive internal biopsy?

Is it very common?

Thanks for any leads you can give. You all are such a blessing to me! :D

VitaminDGirl Apprentice

PS would there be any other blood tests I could do before a biopsy that may give more ideas about if I have celiac?

Like is IgG testing what some follow-up with?

Thanks.

nora-n Rookie

Officially, 20% of biopsy-proven celiacs with villous atropy have negative bloodwork, and partial villous atrophy, patchy celiac, about half are negative.

VitaminDGirl Apprentice

Officially, 20% of biopsy-proven celiacs with villous atropy have negative bloodwork, and partial villous atrophy, patchy celiac, about half are negative.

THank you again. Those numbers are bigger than I thought. I think I will try and have the biopsy done.

<_<

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,976
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Redrayvyn
    Newest Member
    Redrayvyn
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      It sounds like your gastroenterologist is becoming increasingly confident that celiac disease is the likely diagnosis based on both your older and newer lab results. Her suggestion to call each Monday for possible cancellations is actually a great strategy—especially given how long the wait is until your August 29th appointment. It’s also a good sign that she’s advocating for you to be seen sooner, which shows she’s taking your case seriously. The fact that some labs might not have been drawn yet due to overlap with your functional health doctor’s upcoming testing adds a layer of confusion, but that’s unfortunately common when multiple providers are involved. Hopefully, the GI’s remaining labs will still get processed, or she can reorder them if needed. As for the colonoscopy prep, it’s totally understandable that you're dreading it—many people rank it among the least pleasant medical experiences. You’re definitely not alone in preferring the pill prep option over the liquid kind, especially if you don’t drink Gatorade and had a rough experience with Miralax in the past. Hopefully, your doctor will approve the pill form, especially since you’ve tolerated other options poorly before. Fortunately, the upper endoscopy doesn’t require any bowel prep—just fasting, usually starting the night before—so that part should be easier to handle. It’s great that you’re already trying to boost your gluten intake, but yes, tracking gluten content can be surprisingly tricky. You’re right that the general rule for wheat-based products is to multiply the protein content by about 0.75 to estimate the gluten content. That means foods like oyster crackers, while convenient, may not pack enough gluten to help reach the recommended daily goal of around 10 grams before biopsy. It’s helpful that you caught that early, and switching to more gluten-dense foods like regular wheat bread, pasta, or wheat cereals might make it easier to hit your target. It’s not easy eating more gluten when you’re trying to manage symptoms or just not used to it, but doing so can make a big difference in ensuring your biopsies are accurate. You’re on the right track—hopefully with a little luck, you’ll get a cancellation and be seen sooner.
    • cristiana
      Thanks for sharing that film, @trents.  I am not sure how I missed that film as I see it is a few years old, but it is very good.  I think you should be fine if you take your own packed lunch and eat it from your own lunchbox etc.  Might be worth doing a lunchtime recce to see how cramped the room is before making a decision - for all you know, there may be other people  there who don't eat gluten?
    • cameo674
      The GI doc messaged me this afternoon that she believes that the new blood work added to the old is definitely  looking like a celiac diagnosis is in my future.  She wants to me to call into scheduling each Monday to see if I can get my August 29th appointment moved up due to cancellations.  I have never had a doctor recommend that.  She also said there were additional labs that she requested still out that have not come back yet; so, they may have been missed drawing those since the functional health doctor has a whole slew of labs that I am suppose to be waiting until August 27th to do. I am still waiting to hear on whether or not she will allow me to do pill prep versus the typical gatorade prep that I did 8 years ago for that colonoscopy.  I do not drink gatorade to begin with and that miralax prep kept me in the bathroom up until we drove to the procedure.  My younger brother said the pill form was fairly easy when the liquid form is hard to swallow. Colonoscopy prep is definitely close to number one on the list of things I never want to experience again if I could avoid it.  Number one is a different medication that caused severe cramping that had me in tears until it wore off.  Never having had an endoscopy, I have no idea of what that prep is like, but it cannot be worse right? I started munching on oyster crackers last night.  It is shocking how filling they are.  I just read that I need to pay attention to the protein content of the wheat bread product or I will miss the gluten goal of 10 g per day prior to testing.  The post said that I should look at the protein and multiple that number by .75 if it is a wheat flour product to see how much gluten is in it.  No more oyster crackers for me.  I would have to eat 10 oz bag everyday to meet my goal.  not going to happen.
    • Alibu
      Well, I've made if from the pre-diagnosis forum to here!  I've been diagnosed with "latent" or "potential" celiac and my doctor has suggested me to go gluten-free before my appointment with him in October (first available, LOL).  My ttg-iga was 152, my EMA was positive, I have the gene, but my biopsy was negative (and he took 12 samples), so it makes sense to go gluten free to see if I improve. I know the basics - I can find lists of things to avoid, I know about hidden dangers, etc. all of that.  Where I'm struggling is just STARTING.  I need to go shopping and stock up on some staples.  My goal is to not try to find gluten-free alternatives, but to focus on naturally gluten-free foods like proteins, veggies, fruits, and carbs like potatoes and rice.  However, the rest of the household will not be gluten-free, which is fine, I don't want them to for various reasons.  But I have SO much food in my house in the pantry and fridge and cabinets, and it feels like I need to get rid of a lot in order for me to start fresh, but at the same time, I can't get rid of everything. I guess it's just feeling overwhelming and I've never given up gluten before so this is going to be a huge shift for me and I feel like I need SPACE, but I can't quite have that. Any advice on just getting started and organizing myself would be great!  
    • Scott Adams
      It’s great that you were finally able to see a gastroenterologist—and even luckier to get in the same day as your referral! It sounds like your GI is taking a very thorough approach, which is reassuring given your complex symptoms and history. The confusion around your different tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody results is understandable. The variation between your December and June labs may be due to multiple factors, including differences in the lab performing the test (Quest vs. Mayo Clinic), the specific assay used, and the amount of gluten you had been consuming before each test. Antibody levels can drop significantly when gluten is reduced or eliminated from the diet, even partially, which might explain why your recent tTG IgA was now negative and your tTG IgG was borderline high. That’s likely why your GI mentioned it was “usually the reverse”—typically, tTG IgA is more commonly elevated in confirmed celiac, not IgG alone, especially when IgA levels are sufficient, as yours are. Your gene testing confirms that you carry HLA types (DQ2.2 most likely) that are permissive for celiac disease, meaning you can develop it, but not everyone with these genes will. These genes don’t explain why your symptoms are milder or different from others with celiac—many people have so-called "silent" or atypical presentations like yours, with issues like long-term heartburn, loose stools, nutrient intolerances, or just gradually adapting to symptoms over time. It’s not uncommon to assume these symptoms are just aging, medication side effects, or lifestyle-related until someone finally connects the dots. It’s a good thing your daughter advocated for you to be tested—many cases are missed for years because they don’t follow the “textbook” presentation. As for the immunoglobulin tests, your doctor likely ordered those to ensure your immune system is functioning normally, particularly your IgA level, since a deficiency can cause false-negative celiac blood tests. Since your IgA level is normal, your tTG IgA test should be reliable (assuming adequate gluten intake), but again, if you weren't eating enough gluten, that could explain the lower antibody levels now. The comprehensive metabolic panel and negative stool parasite results are additional pieces ruling out other causes of your symptoms, like infections or organ dysfunction. The upcoming endoscopy and colonoscopy should provide more definitive answers, especially with biopsies looking for celiac disease, eosinophilic esophagitis, and microscopic colitis. It’s completely valid to feel unsure about what you’re experiencing, especially when your symptoms have been lifelong or gradually worsening without being severe. You’re not alone—many adults with celiac or gluten-related disorders report subtle or chronic symptoms they’ve normalized. You’re doing the right thing by staying on gluten now through your procedure date in August. Try not to stress about reaching the full 6-slice equivalent each day, but do increase your gluten intake as much as tolerable (e.g., a couple of pieces of bread, pasta, crackers, etc.) to give the biopsy the best chance of detecting any damage. Good luck with your upcoming procedures—you’re closer than ever to answers and a clearer direction forward.
×
×
  • Create New...